This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: PR 5904: maintainership of GNU Ada
- From: "Joseph S. Myers" <jsm28 at cam dot ac dot uk>
- To: Joe Buck <Joe dot Buck at synopsys dot com>
- Cc: <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Sat, 4 May 2002 16:58:53 +0100 (BST)
- Subject: Re: PR 5904: maintainership of GNU Ada
On Fri, 3 May 2002, Joe Buck wrote:
> > The mainline gnat_rm.texi manual has FSF copyright notices.
> Is there any reason for the branch to have a different manual? Any code
> changes reflected in the difference?
There was a big code merge of Ada to the mainline only. However, since so
far manual merges haven't been done simultaneously with code merges (part
of the work-in-progress nature of the integration - eventually hopefully
there will be fine-grained merges where docs go along with code), the
branch manual version may well not reflect the branch code version
Merging the mainline manual to the branch would fix all but one of the
bogus ACT references mentioned in ada/6399, leaving just
Technologies does not currently supply a suitable binding generator tool.
(and a "GNAT is maintained by Ada Core Technologies Inc" comment, and the
listing of ACT as author, which are separate issues).
Joseph S. Myers