This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: ld segfaults in gcc-3.1's configuration
- From: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>
- To: "David O'Brien" <obrien at FreeBSD dot org>
- Cc: Ralf Corsepius <corsepiu at faw dot uni-ulm dot de>, GCC List <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Thu, 2 May 2002 01:48:00 -0400
- Subject: Re: ld segfaults in gcc-3.1's configuration
- References: <1020151274.24718.6251.camel@mccallum> <20020430040809.B23056@devserv.devel.redhat.com> <20020501161858.B21756@dragon.nuxi.com>
- Reply-to: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>
On Wed, May 01, 2002 at 04:18:58PM -0700, David O'Brien wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 30, 2002 at 04:08:09AM -0400, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > Yes, on some architectures ld even segfaults, that's one of the bugs
> > configury is checking for. If you have fixed binutils (hj's 126.96.36.199.7 or
> > CVS), it will not segfault and print yes.
> "CVS" head, or 2.12_branch?
By CVS above I meant both CVS trunk and 2.12 branch.