This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: C++/6527: destructors called in wrong order: regression from 3.0.x
On Wed, May 01, 2002 at 04:25:16PM -0700, Janis Johnson wrote:
> On Thu, May 02, 2002 at 12:24:21AM +0200, Paolo Carlini wrote:
> > Mark Mitchell wrote:
> > > 2002-04-23 Jason Merrill <email@example.com>
> > >
> > > PR c++/5504 - but re-breaks c++/411
> > > * init.c (push_base_cleanups): Rename to perform_base_cleanups.
> > > Expand base cleanups now rather than pushing them.
> > > * decl.c (begin_destructor_body): Don't call push_base_cleanups.
> > > (finish_destructor_body): Call perform_base_cleanups.
> > > * cp-tree.h: Adjust prototype.
> > >
> > > Would you try reverting this patch and see what happens? That's
> > > one thing that's been in this area recently.
> > Ok. I'm rebuilding now.
> > If that reversion is the culprit, however...
> > Paolo.
> I tried it, too, and it is the culprit. 3.1 CVS sources from this
> afternoon fail the test, and with this patch reverted the test passes.
> Now I can go back to finding out what broke Boost.
^ I meant POOMA