gcc archive
author index for May, 2002

This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Indexes:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav:	[Browse other archives for this mailing list] [Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to: This time period only This mailing list only All mailing lists Entire site (no limit)

980611bb

• 2002-05-07 07:57 Small feature for gcc

=?big5?B?IkNoZW4sIEphbWVzICizr7d+t3MgSUFDLU4pIg==?=

• 2002-05-23 01:51 overwrite default float library
• 2002-05-23 01:54 RE: overwrite default float library

Christian Jönsson

• 2002-05-01 02:56 Concerns about configuring libjava: gcj supports -fno-rtti -fno-exceptions ... No
• 2002-05-04 05:05 Is gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/ieee.exp run twice in the test suite?
• 2002-05-04 13:39 RE: Is gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/ieee.exp run twice in the test suite?
• 2002-05-05 01:18 Unable to run gcc-3.1 testsuite fully on sparc32-linux
• 2002-05-10 23:58 Re: Prerelease
• 2002-05-12 12:31 Piping output of compilation to /dev/null?
• 2002-05-12 12:36 Re: Piping output of compilation to /dev/null?
• 2002-05-12 12:50 Re: Piping output of compilation to /dev/null?
• 2002-05-16 14:43 Re: 3.1 build error on OpenBSD 3.1
• 2002-05-20 11:51 Re: Successful build of gcc-3.1 under Cygwin for Win98SE

Daniel Wesslén

• 2002-05-16 06:12 successful build, failed build
• 2002-05-16 06:25 regarding: successful build, failed build
• 2002-05-16 12:06 successful build
• 2002-05-18 04:04 i386 stack alignment

Erwin Ingris

• 2002-05-27 06:35 New Regalloc Branch
• 2002-05-27 09:08 Re: New Regalloc Branch
• 2002-05-30 05:08 Re: New Regalloc Branch

Mat Hounsell

• 2002-05-22 19:33 Build 3.1 Fails, if build dir is on not on source file system, due to hard link creation.

thomas joseph

• 2002-05-14 06:42 cco question ??
• 2002-05-24 01:40 -moptions,

Vassilis Pandis

• 2002-05-11 10:55 Some comments concerning GCC 3.1

=?ks_c_5601-1987?B?wOWw5r3E?=

• 2002-05-05 23:20 help to uncompress gcc.ps.gz

Aaron Lehmann

• 2002-05-15 17:26 Re: your gcc 3.1 release date is a joke
• 2002-05-16 09:40 Re: gcc compile-time performance

Adam Harvey

• 2002-05-21 14:33 GCC for AIX

Adam Megacz

• 2002-05-15 15:18 Re: PATCH for Re: your gcc 3.1 release date is a joke
• 2002-05-15 15:20 Re: your gcc 3.1 release date is a joke

akey

• 2002-05-09 05:51 Modify gcc to make it debug-able

Akim Demaille

• 2002-05-20 04:08 Re: gcc compile-time performance
• 2002-05-20 05:08 Re: gcc compile-time performance
• 2002-05-20 05:53 Re: gcc compile-time performance
• 2002-05-20 11:18 Re: gcc compile-time performance
• 2002-05-20 11:22 Re: gcc compile-time performance

Alaeddin A. Aydiner

• 2002-05-26 18:06 Solaris 64-bit compilation fails with otherwise successful gcc-3.1
• 2002-05-27 08:46 Re: Solaris 64-bit compilation fails with otherwise successful gcc-3.1

Alan Lehotsky

• 2002-05-01 06:32 Re: gcc port to StarCore
• 2002-05-02 05:22 Re: gcc port to StarCore
• 2002-05-02 05:46 Re: gcc port to StarCore
• 2002-05-02 08:04 Re: Variable too large
• 2002-05-02 08:04 Re: gcc port to StarCore
• 2002-05-03 11:28 Re: gcc port to StarCore
• 2002-05-28 15:52 Re: floating point war casualty list
• 2002-05-29 04:37 Re: floating point war casualty list
• 2002-05-29 13:28 Re: New port (ip2k)
• 2002-05-29 16:56 Re: New port (ip2k)
• 2002-05-30 10:32 Question about IA64 GO_IF_LEGITIMATE_ADDRESS - probable bug?

Albert Chin

• 2002-05-24 11:27 Building 3.1 on Tru64 UNIX 4.0D
• 2002-05-26 19:49 GCC 3.1 on IRIX 6.5.14m GOT overflow
• 2002-05-28 13:24 Re: GCC 3.1 on IRIX 6.5.14m GOT overflow
• 2002-05-28 13:29 Re: GCC 3.1 -- Sparc64 Solaris 8 and C++
• 2002-05-28 14:02 Re: GCC 3.1 -- Sparc64 Solaris 8 and C++

Aldy Hernandez

• 2002-05-03 01:47 Re: material for 3.1 release announcement
• 2002-05-05 22:46 rfc: __builtin_types_compatible_p and unsigned literals
• 2002-05-06 04:16 Re: rfc: __builtin_types_compatible_p and unsigned literals
• 2002-05-12 22:16 rfc: vector_cst, reload etc
• 2002-05-12 22:44 Re: rfc: vector_cst, reload etc
• 2002-05-16 18:57 Re: GCC 3.1 Branch
• 2002-05-16 22:32 Re: GCC 3.1 Branch
• 2002-05-16 23:09 Re: GCC 3.1 Branch
• 2002-05-19 22:41 Re: gcc compile-time performance (on sparc solaris)
• 2002-05-20 20:58 Re: Compile error (Internal error: Illegal instruction)
• 2002-05-20 23:39 Re: Compile error (Internal error: Illegal instruction)
• 2002-05-21 17:45 [patch] generic simd support
• 2002-05-29 01:59 Re: FW: register spilling

Alessandro Suardi

• 2002-05-16 15:26 GCC 3.1 produces a larger 2.5.15 Linux kernel than 3.0.4

Alexander Kaps (Betr Goede)

• 2002-05-06 05:57 cross-compiler

Alexander Klein

• 2002-05-31 16:02 What to include in a bugreport related to boostrapping?

Alexandre Courbot

• 2002-05-03 07:20 Getting more information about functions arguments/locals inmachine description
• 2002-05-05 05:00 RE: Getting more information about functions arguments/localsinmachine description
• 2002-05-09 05:50 Stocking temporaries in memory instead of registers?

Alexandre Oliva

• 2002-05-01 13:10 Re: Bootstrap error with gcc-20020429 snapshot on Sun / Solaris8
• 2002-05-01 16:54 Re: Bootstrap error with gcc-20020429 snapshot on Sun / Solaris8
• 2002-05-01 19:52 Re: Bootstrap error with gcc-20020429 snapshot on Sun / Solaris8
• 2002-05-01 21:55 Re: gcc-20020429 make info failure
• 2002-05-01 22:46 Re: Still failing to bootstrap on Solaris (CONFIG_SHELL doesn't help)
• 2002-05-01 22:47 Re: irix 6.5 regressions in 3.1
• 2002-05-02 12:19 Re: Still failing to bootstrap on Solaris (CONFIG_SHELL doesn't help)
• 2002-05-02 19:22 Re: Still failing to bootstrap on Solaris (CONFIG_SHELL doesn't help)
• 2002-05-02 19:33 Re: gcc-20020429 make info failure
• 2002-05-03 11:27 Re: Still failing to bootstrap on Solaris (CONFIG_SHELL doesn't help)
• 2002-05-03 11:39 Re: 3.1 branch ada bootstrap fails
• 2002-05-03 11:45 Re: Concerns about configuring libjava: gcj supports -fno-rtti -fno-exceptions ... No
• 2002-05-03 21:33 Re: 3.1 branch ada bootstrap fails
• 2002-05-03 21:50 Re: material for 3.1 release announcement
• 2002-05-03 21:56 Re: Still failing to bootstrap on Solaris (CONFIG_SHELL doesn't help)
• 2002-05-03 22:21 Re: SH5 compact register numbering in gcc -> gdb interface
• 2002-05-03 22:23 Re: Still failing to bootstrap on Solaris (CONFIG_SHELL doesn't help)
• 2002-05-03 22:41 Re: Still failing to bootstrap on Solaris (CONFIG_SHELL doesn't help)
• 2002-05-04 12:53 Re: 3.1: libjava on sparcv9 not quite right
• 2002-05-04 22:11 Re: Anyone got irix5? I have questions about your ctype implementation
• 2002-05-05 00:40 Re: Questions about ``[PATCH] GCC side of .eh_frame_hdr support (take 3)''
• 2002-05-05 12:01 Re: 3.1: libjava on sparcv9 not quite right
• 2002-05-05 12:10 Re: PR 3373
• 2002-05-06 04:21 Re: Anyone got irix5? I have questions about your ctype implementation
• 2002-05-06 04:29 Re: Charconst valuation and short-circuiting
• 2002-05-06 10:10 Re: cross-compiler
• 2002-05-07 10:31 Re: Anyone got irix5? I have questions about your ctype implementation
• 2002-05-07 13:15 Re: Anyone got irix5? I have questions about your ctype implementation
• 2002-05-07 15:15 Re: Deciphering flags in CXX_FOR_TARGET
• 2002-05-07 16:16 Re: Anyone got irix5? I have questions about your ctype implementation
• 2002-05-07 16:48 Re: Anyone got irix5? I have questions about your ctype implementation
• 2002-05-07 16:49 Re: 3.1 branch ada bootstrap fails
• 2002-05-07 17:17 Re: Anyone got irix5? I have questions about your ctype implementation
• 2002-05-07 17:24 Re: Deciphering flags in CXX_FOR_TARGET
• 2002-05-07 17:26 Re: 3.1 branch ada bootstrap fails
• 2002-05-07 17:26 Re: 3.1 branch ada bootstrap fails
• 2002-05-07 21:38 Re: Anyone got irix5? I have questions about your ctype implementation
• 2002-05-08 19:20 Re: recommended method for building a source distiribution?
• 2002-05-09 21:25 Re: Ada configuration options?
• 2002-05-09 21:54 Re: SH5 compact register numbering in gcc -> gdb interface
• 2002-05-09 22:57 Re: Ada configuration options?
• 2002-05-10 17:24 Re: Problem with compiling
• 2002-05-10 17:38 Re: Posting Question
• 2002-05-11 04:50 Re: Modula-3 links
• 2002-05-11 06:42 Re: Posting Question
• 2002-05-13 13:45 Re: PATCH for Re: Bootstrap error with gcc-20020429 snapshot on Sun / Solaris8
• 2002-05-15 16:37 Re: Help Please -> with forward declarations...
• 2002-05-15 18:11 Re: Is -fpmath=sse enabled in the 3.1 release?
• 2002-05-15 23:45 Re: Error report (gcc 3.1)
• 2002-05-15 23:46 Re: Problems with fstream
• 2002-05-17 22:31 Re: Error report (gcc 3.1)
• 2002-05-17 22:56 Re: gcc compile-time performance
• 2002-05-17 23:11 Re: gcc compile-time performance
• 2002-05-17 23:24 Re: new dejagnu, configure, and C++?
• 2002-05-17 23:33 Re: GCC 3.1 Sparc 64 issue?
• 2002-05-19 06:01 Re: How to build on sparcv9-sun-solaris2.8?
• 2002-05-19 06:24 Re: gcc compile-time performance
• 2002-05-19 07:48 Re: gcc compile-time performance
• 2002-05-19 11:54 Re: Why does this not compile?
• 2002-05-19 15:48 Re: libtool version
• 2002-05-20 03:47 Re: Question on g++ compile options / numerical differences
• 2002-05-20 03:54 Re: gcc compile-time performance (on sparc solaris)
• 2002-05-20 05:01 Re: gcc compile-time performance (on sparc solaris)
• 2002-05-20 05:02 Re: gcc compile-time performance (on sparc solaris)
• 2002-05-20 09:49 Re: QMTest and the G++ testsuite
• 2002-05-20 09:53 Re: gcc compile-time performance (on sparc solaris)
• 2002-05-21 08:59 Re: [PATCH] */Makefile.in should all use @SHELL@, not /bin/sh
• 2002-05-21 10:34 Re: gcc-3.1 configure on i686-pc-linux-gnu
• 2002-05-21 16:09 Re: openssl-0.9.6d
• 2002-05-21 16:31 Re: GCC 3.1 OpenBSD
• 2002-05-21 20:58 Re: bug report
• 2002-05-21 21:29 Re: gcc compile-time performance
• 2002-05-22 16:02 Re: QMTest and the G++ testsuite
• 2002-05-22 16:24 Re: C++ function pointers and automatic class refrences
• 2002-05-22 16:27 Re: question about the rtx code
• 2002-05-22 16:28 Re: 3.1 branch bootstrap fails on sparcv9-sun-solaris2.8
• 2002-05-22 16:35 Re: QMTest and the G++ testsuite
• 2002-05-22 17:18 Re: QMTest and the G++ testsuite
• 2002-05-22 17:28 Re: QMTest and the G++ testsuite
• 2002-05-23 08:34 Re: QMTest and the G++ testsuite
• 2002-05-23 15:17 Re: Error in libstdc++
• 2002-05-23 23:26 Re: Build 3.1 Fails, if build dir is on not on source file system, due to hard link creation.
• 2002-05-25 02:15 Re: Is this a bug for gcc (2.95 and 3.1)?
• 2002-05-27 20:40 Re: Is this a bug for gcc (2.95 and 3.1)?
• 2002-05-31 10:15 Re: Short Displacement Problems.
• 2002-05-31 11:03 Re: C99 conformance bug in gcc-3.1

Alexis Scheuer

• 2002-05-23 00:41 Gcc 3.1 successful installation

Allan Sandfeld Jensen

• 2002-05-11 04:50 Re: Optimizations and gcc
• 2002-05-15 00:11 Re: your gcc 3.1 release date is a joke

Andi Kleen

• 2002-05-16 07:34 Re: gcc compile-time performance
• 2002-05-16 11:31 Re: GCSE store motion
• 2002-05-17 14:08 Re: Some (small) c++ compilation profiling data (oprofile)
• 2002-05-17 14:40 Re: Some (small) c++ compilation profiling data (oprofile)

Andre Leis

• 2002-05-27 14:01 Succsessfull GCC 3.1 with Cygwin and GNAT

Andreas Conz

• 2002-05-19 02:05 GCC 3.1 on AIX good and bad
• 2002-05-21 09:38 Re: GCC 3.1 on AIX good and bad
• 2002-05-22 01:46 GCC 3.1 on AIX
• 2002-05-26 13:13 -fprefetch-loop-arrays on PowerPC
• 2002-05-27 05:47 Re: -fprefetch-loop-arrays on PowerPC

Andreas Jaeger

• 2002-05-12 01:10 Re: [Forwarded] GPC 2.1 released
• 2002-05-15 00:00 Re: your gcc 3.1 release date is a joke
• 2002-05-17 02:53 Re: GCC3.1 just released - already a system compiler
• 2002-05-18 23:19 Re: gcc compile-time performance take 2
• 2002-05-19 03:56 Re: Ada bootstrap failure on mainline
• 2002-05-21 07:40 Fix warning in ggc-page about printf format
• 2002-05-21 12:45 Re: Using GCC 3.1 on SuSe 7.0 (GCC 2.95)
• 2002-05-23 06:48 Re: Mainline fails to bootstrap was Re: Mainline problems withlibgcc2.c
• 2002-05-29 22:19 Re: inlining inefficiencies
• 2002-05-31 01:09 Re: Mainline fails to build
• 2002-05-31 12:49 Re: Merge from pch branch; call for testers
• 2002-05-31 22:44 Re: Merge from pch branch; call for testers

Andreas Schwab

• 2002-05-01 11:33 Miscompiled expr from sh-utils-2.0.12 on ia64 (PR6534)
• 2002-05-04 08:32 Ada does not build (line too long)
• 2002-05-04 16:21 Re: Ada does not build (line too long)
• 2002-05-04 16:36 Re: Ada does not build (line too long)
• 2002-05-06 03:22 Re: Ada does not build (line too long)
• 2002-05-06 03:24 Re: GCC 3.1 Release
• 2002-05-06 07:57 Re: GCC 3.1 Release
• 2002-05-06 14:34 Re: Ada does not build (line too long)
• 2002-05-07 01:43 Re: GCC 3.1 Release
• 2002-05-07 06:40 Re: i386 and asm jumping
• 2002-05-07 12:09 Re: Small feature for gcc
• 2002-05-08 01:57 Re: i386 and asm jumping
• 2002-05-08 16:41 Re: 3.1 m68k/coldfire code gen problem!!
• 2002-05-09 07:41 Re: 3.1 m68k/coldfire code gen problem!!
• 2002-05-09 10:00 Re: 3.1 m68k/coldfire code gen problem!!
• 2002-05-13 02:24 Re: Coding standards (was treelang patch)
• 2002-05-14 14:31 Re: GCC 3.1 Ada status for various platforms
• 2002-05-15 01:27 Re: __HAVE_BUILTIN_SETJMP__: why?
• 2002-05-17 03:06 Re: -O2 versus -O1 (Was: Re: GCSE store motion)
• 2002-05-21 09:01 Re: Fix warning in ggc-page about printf format
• 2002-05-21 11:59 Re: va_list question
• 2002-05-22 13:53 Re: va_list question
• 2002-05-23 07:49 Re: Error in libstdc++
• 2002-05-24 03:14 Re: Merge from pch branch; call for testers
• 2002-05-24 04:26 Re: RegRegname vs. Explicit Local Register Variables ...
• 2002-05-24 04:37 Re: libffi declaration mystery
• 2002-05-24 07:14 Re: Bootstrap compilers (Was: 3.2 PATCH: Fully support parallelgnat1...)
• 2002-05-24 14:35 Re: Merge from pch branch; call for testers
• 2002-05-27 11:06 Re: Mainline won't bootstrap on Linux/alpha
• 2002-05-30 07:23 Re: Newest gcc memory leak on gdb (heads up, only)
• 2002-05-31 01:15 Re: Get rid of -trigraphs?
• 2002-05-31 01:22 Re: configure.in - target_libs def. needs a back slash?
• 2002-05-31 01:34 Re: gcc3.1 installation
• 2002-05-31 02:56 Re: Merge from pch branch; call for testers

Andrew C. Oliver

• 2002-05-24 06:42 broken link
• 2002-05-24 15:00 Re: broken link

Andrew Cagney

• 2002-05-07 09:41 Re: SH5 compact register numbering in gcc -> gdb interface
• 2002-05-07 10:12 Re: SH5 compact register numbering in gcc -> gdb interface
• 2002-05-07 15:13 Re: SH5 compact register numbering in gcc -> gdb interface
• 2002-05-09 16:50 Re: SH5 compact register numbering in gcc -> gdb interface - include/elf/sh.h?
• 2002-05-10 07:33 Re: SH5 compact register numbering in gcc -> gdb interface - include/elf/sh.h?
• 2002-05-10 07:41 Re: SH5 compact register numbering in gcc -> gdb interface - include/elf/sh.h?

Andrew Pinski

• 2002-05-16 11:40 Re: 3.1 build error on OpenBSD 3.1
• 2002-05-27 17:06 Re: GCC build failed for native with your patch on 2002-05-27T20:45:13Z.
• 2002-05-29 23:31 Re: Get rid of -trigraphs?

Andrey Petrov

• 2002-05-24 13:28 Re: mainline performance regression (observered on SPARC)
• 2002-05-24 13:58 Re: mainline performance regression (observered on SPARC)

Andy Tai

• 2002-05-15 20:10 linker error messages when using gcc 3.1
• 2002-05-15 20:35 Re: linker error messages when using gcc 3.1

Anthony Green

• 2002-05-29 13:36 Re: New port (ip2k)

Antigen

• 2002-05-28 13:38 Antigen found HTML/MimeExploit.IFRAME (CA(InoculateIT)) virus

ANTIGEN_SCEXCH01

• 2002-05-28 13:45 Antigen found Win32.Klez.H (CA(Vet),McAfee4,CA(InoculateIT)) virus
• 2002-05-28 13:45 Antigen found HTML/MimeExploit.IFRAME (CA(InoculateIT)) virus

Antonis Xanthakis

• 2002-05-01 10:49 DOCDEMO
• 2002-05-01 15:10 TVDEMO

anuchit aromsawa

• 2002-05-16 08:47 Successful build GCC 3.1 RE:gcc 3.1 md5 sums
• 2002-05-17 01:47 Re: Successful build GCC 3.1 RE:gcc 3.1 md5 sums

Arkadiusz Miskiewicz

• 2002-05-13 14:45 Re: Final GCC 3.1 Prerelease
• 2002-05-16 10:29 Succesful bootstrap of gcc 3.1

Arnaud Charlet

• 2002-05-01 13:58 Re: Ada bugs

Arthur I Schwarz

• 2002-05-07 16:33 Re: Algol Front end
• 2002-05-08 11:41 Re: Algol Front end

Arto Nirkko

• 2002-05-29 03:09 gcc-3.1 bootstrap (all languages) successful with -O3 -funroll-loops

Arvind Krishnaswamy

• 2002-05-02 14:04 predicated instructions in ARM
• 2002-05-07 12:43 xscale-elf-gcc

aschwarz1309

• 2002-05-12 13:35 Re: GCC/UML/XMI extraction (was gcc front end )
• 2002-05-16 10:27 Re: gcc 3.1 Released
• 2002-05-18 17:17 GCC 3.1 Build (mixed results)
• 2002-05-31 08:42 Re: Gcc compiler

attonie

• 2002-05-17 06:15 compiler implementation

Ayose

• 2002-05-17 09:37 Successful build on debian, but...

bemis

• 2002-05-06 08:10 alphas basic toolchain build fails
• 2002-05-09 07:45 # of untested cases 22 for alpha g++ only 9 for intel
• 2002-05-09 10:59 Compilation Error on alphas
• 2002-05-14 06:10 Two failed tests with gcc
• 2002-05-15 07:46 Alphas fail to produce warning "%LX"
• 2002-05-15 10:25 "%LX" and Alphas fail to produce warning

Ben

• 2002-05-31 12:14 How are you sir/madam?

Ben Woodhead

• 2002-05-15 05:49 RE: your gcc 3.1 release date is a joke
• 2002-05-23 11:50 Recommended Optimization

Benjamin Collar

• 2002-05-24 07:56 successful build and install

Benjamin Kosnik

• 2002-05-02 10:33 Re: material for 3.1 release announcement
• 2002-05-17 01:21 Re: Error report (gcc 3.1)

Benoit Plessis

• 2002-05-16 02:55 pb checking ld capabilities

Bernard Dautrevaux

• 2002-05-24 01:19 RE: Is this a bug for gcc (2.95 and 3.1)?
• 2002-05-27 09:55 RE: Is this a bug for gcc (2.95 and 3.1)?
• 2002-05-27 10:20 RE: Is this a bug for gcc (2.95 and 3.1)?

Bernd Jendrissek

• 2002-05-08 03:53 Re: i386 and asm jumping

Bert Deknuydt

• 2002-05-17 07:02 Successful build on Irix 6.5.15m
• 2002-05-23 07:37 Problem with -funsafe-math-optimizations on alpha-dec-osf4.0f (gcc 3.1)

Bill Trautman

• 2002-05-21 17:50 Trying to Eliminate Warning Message
• 2002-05-21 18:46 Re: Trying to Eliminate Warning Message
• 2002-05-21 19:42 Re: Trying to Eliminate Warning Message

Bill Walker

• 2002-05-16 05:54 gcc 3.1 failed under SCI OSR 5.0.5

Billinghurst, David (CRTS)

• 2002-05-02 20:51 RE: GCC 3.1 Showstoppers
• 2002-05-03 20:27 PR fortran/6545 may be a high priority bug for 3.1
• 2002-05-14 18:08 RE: GCC 3.1 Ada status for various platforms
• 2002-05-23 17:03 RE: Successful build on Irix 6.5.15m
• 2002-05-26 20:05 RE: GCC 3.1 on IRIX 6.5.14m GOT overflow
• 2002-05-27 17:01 RE: Succsessfull GCC 3.1 with Cygwin and GNAT
• 2002-05-28 05:53 RE: gcj was successfully compiled in cygwin. But it complains libgcj.spec wasn't found

Blair Kelly III

• 2002-05-31 07:59 master copy of obstack.h?

Bo Thorsen

• 2002-05-23 05:27 Error in libstdc++
• 2002-05-23 08:15 Re: Error in libstdc++
• 2002-05-24 04:09 libffi declaration mystery
• 2002-05-24 04:20 Re: libffi declaration mystery
• 2002-05-28 00:12 Re: GCC build failed for native with your patch on 2002-05-27T20:45:13Z.
• 2002-05-28 00:54 Re: GCC build failed for native with your patch on 2002-05-27T20:45:13Z.

Bob Boz

• 2002-05-01 13:01 GPL question
• 2002-05-21 10:39 va_list question
• 2002-05-22 13:50 RE: va_list question

Bob Jamison

• 2002-05-01 08:41 Re: irix 6.5 regressions in 3.1
• 2002-05-15 09:30 Current snapshots build nicely on Irix6.5

Bobby McNulty Junior

• 2002-05-15 15:38 RE ignoranc: was Re: your gcc 3.1 release date is a joke
• 2002-05-16 13:46 GCC 3.1 on Celeron II

Boehm, Hans

• 2002-05-18 15:19 Trunk miscompiles libjava (resend)
• 2002-05-22 17:14 Exceptions on IA64 with 64K pages

Bohdan Vlasyuk

• 2002-05-21 01:31 3.1 and precompiled headers
• 2002-05-21 07:35 Re: 3.1 and precompiled headers

Bonzini

• 2002-05-06 04:07 Re: Charconst valuation and short-circuiting
• 2002-05-22 10:55 Re: Some (small) c++ compilation profiling data (oprofile)

Bonzini Paolo

• 2002-05-08 00:56 BCD [was Re: Algol front end]

Brad House

• 2002-05-28 10:39 GCC 3.1 -- Sparc64 Solaris 8 and C++
• 2002-05-28 13:48 Re: GCC 3.1 -- Sparc64 Solaris 8 and C++
• 2002-05-28 14:23 Re: GCC 3.1 -- Sparc64 Solaris 8 and C++

Brad Lucier

• 2002-05-02 17:13 Large 3.1 performance anomalies on sparc
• 2002-05-04 07:16 3.1: libjava on sparcv9 not quite right
• 2002-05-04 21:25 Re: 3.1: libjava on sparcv9 not quite right
• 2002-05-05 11:22 Re: 3.1: libjava on sparcv9 not quite right
• 2002-05-06 09:55 ada/6160 still fails for 3.1
• 2002-05-06 13:10 Re: ada/6160 still fails for 3.1
• 2002-05-08 09:46 Long bootstrap/check times on sparc
• 2002-05-13 19:29 Regressions in 3.2
• 2002-05-15 05:16 Re: Regressions in 3.2
• 2002-05-16 08:29 Re: -O2 versus -O1 (Was: Re: GCSE store motion)
• 2002-05-19 10:01 Re: gcc compile-time performance (on sparc solaris)
• 2002-05-19 21:44 Re: gcc compile-time performance (on sparc solaris)
• 2002-05-19 23:01 Re: gcc compile-time performance (on sparc solaris)
• 2002-05-20 13:28 Re: gcc compile-time performance (on sparc solaris)
• 2002-05-22 08:03 3.1 branch bootstrap fails on sparcv9-sun-solaris2.8
• 2002-05-22 12:04 Re: 3.1 branch bootstrap fails on sparcv9-sun-solaris2.8
• 2002-05-22 21:03 Re: 3.1 branch bootstrap fails on sparcv9-sun-solaris2.8
• 2002-05-22 21:46 Re: 3.1 branch bootstrap fails on sparcv9-sun-solaris2.8
• 2002-05-22 22:43 libstdc++ bootstrap failure, today's 3.2 on sparcv9-sun-solaris2.8
• 2002-05-23 19:37 Re: libstdc++ bootstrap failure, today's 3.2 on sparcv9-sun-solaris2.8
• 2002-05-26 00:55 3.1 bootstrap error in gcc/intl on sparcv9-sun-solaris2.8
• 2002-05-27 08:32 3.2 bootstrap failure in libgcc on sparcv9-sun-solaris2.8
• 2002-05-28 14:36 3.2 bootstrap failure in libjava on sparcv9-sun-solaris2.8
• 2002-05-29 13:17 Mainline bootstrap failure in sparcv7/libjava on sparcv9-sun-solaris2.8
• 2002-05-30 13:43 Re: 3.2 bootstrap failure in libjava on sparcv9-sun-solaris2.8
• 2002-05-30 13:53 Re: 3.2 bootstrap failure in libjava on sparcv9-sun-solaris2.8
• 2002-05-30 15:43 Re: 3.2 bootstrap failure in libjava on sparcv9-sun-solaris2.8
• 2002-05-30 16:57 Re: 3.2 bootstrap failure in libjava on sparcv9-sun-solaris2.8

Brett Boren

• 2002-05-02 14:55 New gcc hacker: problems with NOTE_LOOP RTL notes

Britt.Snodgrass

• 2002-05-02 08:59 Ada in gcc 3.1

Bryce McKinlay

• 2002-05-08 22:30 Re: G3/G4 -march flags?
• 2002-05-09 22:53 Re: TREE_UNCHANGING?
• 2002-05-20 20:50 Re: libgcj size
• 2002-05-26 02:32 Re: __builtin_prefetch() question
• 2002-05-27 00:59 Unreachable EH region? (PR 6823)
• 2002-05-28 18:44 Re: gcj was successfully compiled in cygwin. But it complains libgcj.specwasn't found
• 2002-05-29 00:35 Java segfault in predict.c
• 2002-05-29 19:55 Re: Java segfault in predict.c
• 2002-05-29 23:39 RFC: Disable RTL inlininer for Java?
• 2002-05-30 18:35 Re: 3.2 bootstrap failure in libjava on sparcv9-sun-solaris2.8
• 2002-05-30 20:28 Re: 3.2 bootstrap failure in libjava on sparcv9-sun-solaris2.8

Carl Eugen Hoyos

• 2002-05-20 04:45 Successful build of gcc-3.1 under Cygwin for Win98SE
• 2002-05-20 15:50 Successful build of gcc-3.1 on powerpc-SuSE-Linux
• 2002-05-24 06:00 Successful build of gcc-3.1 on powerpc-Apple-OS X 10.1.4
• 2002-05-28 05:47 Successful build of gcc-3.1 (ObjC) on Irix6.5

Chenfu Wang

• 2002-05-28 05:38 gcj was successfully compiled in cygwin. But it complains libgcj.spec wasn't found

Chip Cuntz

• 2002-05-15 06:56 RE: your gcc 3.1 release date is a joke
• 2002-05-17 07:02 RE: gcc compile-time performance
• 2002-05-17 07:36 RE: gcc compile-time performance

Chipper C. Cuntz

• 2002-05-17 08:01 Stupid Ass SMEX Content Filter

Chris Lattner

• 2002-05-01 12:51 Strange RTL problem
• 2002-05-01 13:12 Re: Strange RTL problem
• 2002-05-01 20:30 Re: Strange RTL problem (n/m)
• 2002-05-03 09:59 RE: Getting more information about functions arguments/localsinmachine description

Christian Bayer

• 2002-05-10 11:20 install gcc 3.0.4 & 2.95.3 parallel

Christian Hinkelbein

• 2002-05-10 14:17 undefined __ia64_app_header with gc-3.0.4,glibc-2.5.5 on ia64

Christoph Hellwig

• 2002-05-13 03:40 Re: Coding standards (was treelang patch)
• 2002-05-15 09:10 Re: ANSIfy include/linux/a.out.h and include/linux/nls.h

Christopher Faylor

• 2002-05-03 08:36 Re: Anyone got irix5? I have questions about your ctype implementation
• 2002-05-16 13:50 Ok to make a temporary branch for cygwin/mingw?
• 2002-05-17 09:22 Re: Stupid Ass SMEX Content Filter
• 2002-05-17 10:44 Re: Stupid Ass SMEX Content Filter
• 2002-05-19 20:57 Re: Gcc compiler
• 2002-05-21 11:13 Re: U/WIN host

CM

• 2002-05-20 06:22 RE: Uninstalling GCC
• 2002-05-24 09:44 Errors in CVS files?
• 2002-05-31 16:06 RE: What to include in a bugreport related to boostrapping?

Craig Newell

• 2002-05-23 19:06 RegRegname vs. Explicit Local Register Variables ...

Craig Rodrigues

• 2002-05-06 07:53 Re: make check errors with gcc-3.1
• 2002-05-06 17:38 Using ccache to improve compilation speed
• 2002-05-08 06:12 Re: gcc-3.0.4-installation for aix 4.3.3
• 2002-05-15 11:38 Re: Regressions in 3.2
• 2002-05-15 18:48 Re: GCC 3.1 Released
• 2002-05-15 19:26 Re: GCC 3.1 Released
• 2002-05-15 20:21 Re: linker error messages when using gcc 3.1
• 2002-05-16 14:44 Re: Successful build GCC 3.1 RE:gcc 3.1 md5 sums
• 2002-05-16 15:09 GCC software requirements?
• 2002-05-28 19:02 Re: can't commit changes
• 2002-05-30 13:10 Re: Bug Archive Search Down?
• 2002-05-30 19:21 Re: QMTest and the G++ testsuite

D. Towner

• 2002-05-02 06:40 Variable too large
• 2002-05-17 04:33 Successful Build of 3.1 on Mandrake

Dale Johannesen

• 2002-05-14 12:09 Re: Dumb register allocation (PPC)
• 2002-05-15 14:06 Re: GCSE store motion
• 2002-05-20 11:22 Re: Ada bootstrap failure on mainline
• 2002-05-20 13:57 Re: Compile error (Internal error: Illegal instruction)

Dan Nelson

• 2002-05-19 19:34 Re: Re : "bounds checking extension to gcc-3.0.4"

Dan Nicolaescu

• 2002-05-12 16:23 [RFC] fix char* restrict
• 2002-05-17 12:01 Re: C++ aliasing rules
• 2002-05-21 23:13 SPARC code inefficiency
• 2002-05-22 00:13 Re: SPARC code inefficiency
• 2002-05-22 10:09 Re: SPARC code inefficiency
• 2002-05-23 23:48 g++ emits .global twice
• 2002-05-24 11:07 g++ performance comparison: 3.1 vs mainline
• 2002-05-24 11:36 mainline performance regression (observered on SPARC)
• 2002-05-24 11:58 Re: mainline performance regression (observered on SPARC)
• 2002-05-24 13:50 Re: mainline performance regression (observered on SPARC)
• 2002-05-24 13:53 Re: mainline performance regression (observered on SPARC)
• 2002-05-24 14:17 Re: mainline performance regression (observered on SPARC)
• 2002-05-29 16:25 inlining inefficiencies
• 2002-05-29 22:31 Re: inlining inefficiencies
• 2002-05-30 08:58 Re: inlining inefficiencies
• 2002-05-30 10:19 Re: inlining inefficiencies
• 2002-05-31 03:33 Re: inlining inefficiencies
• 2002-05-31 05:56 Re: inlining inefficiencies

Dan Towner

• 2002-05-27 12:04 Pretend Argument Alignment Query
• 2002-05-31 08:55 Removing LIB2FUNCs

Daniel Berlin

• 2002-05-07 04:47 Re: Using ccache to improve compilation speed
• 2002-05-07 05:32 Re: Using ccache to improve compilation speed
• 2002-05-08 19:46 Re: TREE_UNCHANGING?
• 2002-05-08 23:33 Re: TREE_UNCHANGING?
• 2002-05-09 09:01 Re: Benchmarks gcc 3.0.4 (soon 3.1) vs. Intel C++ 6.0
• 2002-05-09 19:53 Re: vtable optimization (was Re: TREE_UNCHANGING?)
• 2002-05-10 11:05 Re: vtable optimization (was Re: TREE_UNCHANGING?)
• 2002-05-14 22:50 Re: GCSE store motion
• 2002-05-15 00:03 Re: GCSE store motion
• 2002-05-15 07:30 Re: your gcc 3.1 release date is a joke
• 2002-05-15 09:03 Re: GCSE store motion
• 2002-05-15 09:39 Re: GCSE store motion
• 2002-05-15 09:53 Re: GCSE store motion
• 2002-05-15 10:02 Re: GCSE store motion
• 2002-05-15 10:14 Let's be clear about store motion
• 2002-05-15 12:55 Re: GCSE store motion
• 2002-05-16 08:05 Re: GCSE store motion
• 2002-05-16 08:31 Re: GCSE store motion
• 2002-05-16 14:19 Re: GCSE store motion
• 2002-05-17 09:01 Re: gcc compile-time performance
• 2002-05-29 12:05 Re: [ast-optimizer-branch] merged mainline into branch as of 2002-05-26
• 2002-05-30 06:08 Re: inlining inefficiencies
• 2002-05-30 09:32 Re: inlining inefficiencies
• 2002-05-30 10:24 Re: inlining inefficiencies

Daniel Egger

• 2002-05-08 10:14 Re: G3/G4 -march flags?
• 2002-05-17 02:54 Re: -O2 versus -O1 (Was: Re: GCSE store motion)
• 2002-05-18 11:01 RE: gcc compile-time performance
• 2002-05-19 03:29 Re: gcc compile-time performance
• 2002-05-19 04:55 Re: gcc compile-time performance take 2
• 2002-05-21 11:44 SSA-DCE broken on mainline
• 2002-05-22 14:09 Re: [patch] generic simd support

Daniel Frey

• 2002-05-29 06:37 Possible extension for web-pages

Daniel Jacobowitz

• 2002-05-01 17:52 Re: Strange RTL problem
• 2002-05-05 20:04 Re: -fno-guess-branch-probability switch...
• 2002-05-06 07:26 Re: make check errors with gcc-3.1
• 2002-05-06 08:23 Re: make check errors with gcc-3.1
• 2002-05-06 14:49 Re: PR 6212
• 2002-05-14 16:08 Re: Minimal GCC/Linux shared lib + EH bug example
• 2002-05-16 10:25 Re: linker error messages when using gcc 3.1
• 2002-05-16 10:29 Re: cleanup query: _ALL_SOURCE
• 2002-05-16 21:12 Re: GCC 3.1 Branch
• 2002-05-16 21:34 Re: GCC 3.1 version string
• 2002-05-17 17:01 Re: Successful build for Debian woody powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu
• 2002-05-18 07:48 Re: gcc compile-time performance
• 2002-05-18 13:09 Re: gcc compile-time performance
• 2002-05-19 05:45 Re: gcc compile-time performance
• 2002-05-19 21:45 Re: gcc compile-time performance
• 2002-05-20 21:12 Re: Compile error (Internal error: Illegal instruction)
• 2002-05-22 16:46 Re: QMTest and the G++ testsuite
• 2002-05-22 17:53 Re: QMTest and the G++ testsuite
• 2002-05-23 19:16 Re: QMTest and the G++ testsuite
• 2002-05-28 21:15 Re: 3.2 PATCH: Fully support parallel gnat1/gnatbind builds
• 2002-05-30 08:20 Re: inlining inefficiencies
• 2002-05-30 08:22 Re: unable to build glibc-2.2.5 with gcc-3.1 for ARM
• 2002-05-30 12:53 Re: libstdc++ configure foobar ?
• 2002-05-30 13:46 Re: libstdc++ configure foobar ?

Danish Samad

• 2002-05-10 02:02 accessing higher portions of registers
• 2002-05-13 02:05 register allocation problem
• 2002-05-30 22:05 gcc register allocation

Dara Hazeghi

• 2002-05-15 17:05 gcc compile-time performance
• 2002-05-17 06:48 Re: gcc compile-time performance
• 2002-05-17 06:48 Re: gcc compile-time performance
• 2002-05-18 09:26 libgcj size
• 2002-05-18 17:55 gcc compile-time performance take 2
• 2002-05-19 07:24 Re: gcc compile-time performance take 2

Darin DeCounter

• 2002-05-03 14:17 Help! Attempting to install gcc 3.0.4

Dave Fladebo

• 2002-05-05 19:58 -fno-guess-branch-probability switch...
• 2002-05-07 11:26 docs. on -fno-guess-branch-probability
• 2002-05-07 12:20 Re: docs. on -fno-guess-branch-probability

Dave Lampe

• 2002-05-16 16:21 Successful build of gcc-3.1 on Solaris Intel 5.8

David Abrahams

• 2002-05-12 04:52 Re: Minimal GCC/Linux shared lib + EH bug example
• 2002-05-12 07:16 Re: Minimal GCC/Linux shared lib + EH bug example
• 2002-05-12 07:51 Re: Minimal GCC/Linux shared lib + EH bug example
• 2002-05-12 08:17 Re: Minimal GCC/Linux shared lib + EH bug example
• 2002-05-12 12:17 Re: Minimal GCC/Linux shared lib + EH bug example
• 2002-05-12 12:39 Re: Minimal GCC/Linux shared lib + EH bug example
• 2002-05-13 04:20 Re: Minimal GCC/Linux shared lib + EH bug example
• 2002-05-13 04:30 Re: Minimal GCC/Linux shared lib + EH bug example
• 2002-05-13 18:05 Re: Minimal GCC/Linux shared lib + EH bug example
• 2002-05-13 18:26 Re: Minimal GCC/Linux shared lib + EH bug example
• 2002-05-14 04:56 Re: Minimal GCC/Linux shared lib + EH bug example
• 2002-05-14 11:40 Re: Minimal GCC/Linux shared lib + EH bug example
• 2002-05-14 13:28 Re: Minimal GCC/Linux shared lib + EH bug example
• 2002-05-14 13:53 Re: Minimal GCC/Linux shared lib + EH bug example
• 2002-05-14 20:16 Re: Minimal GCC/Linux shared lib + EH bug example
• 2002-05-15 08:17 Re: Minimal GCC/Linux shared lib + EH bug example
• 2002-05-15 15:55 Re: Minimal GCC/Linux shared lib + EH bug example
• 2002-05-15 16:25 Re: Minimal GCC/Linux shared lib + EH bug example
• 2002-05-15 21:10 Re: Minimal GCC/Linux shared lib + EH bug example
• 2002-05-18 15:01 Re: Minimal GCC/Linux shared lib + EH bug example
• 2002-05-18 16:15 Re: Minimal GCC/Linux shared lib + EH bug example
• 2002-05-18 16:17 Re: Minimal GCC/Linux shared lib + EH bug example
• 2002-05-19 04:35 Re: Duplicate data objects in shared libraries
• 2002-05-19 04:45 Re: Minimal GCC/Linux shared lib + EH bug example
• 2002-05-19 05:19 Re: Duplicate data objects in shared libraries
• 2002-05-20 06:21 Re: Duplicate data objects in shared libraries
• 2002-05-20 09:25 Re: Duplicate data objects in shared libraries
• 2002-05-20 12:42 Re: Duplicate data objects in shared libraries
• 2002-05-20 13:18 Re: Duplicate data objects in shared libraries
• 2002-05-20 13:23 Re: Duplicate data objects in shared libraries
• 2002-05-22 17:37 Re: Duplicate data objects in shared libraries

David Beazley

• 2002-05-20 12:40 Re: Duplicate data objects in shared libraries
• 2002-05-20 13:26 Re: Duplicate data objects in shared libraries

David Edelsohn

• 2002-05-01 08:38 Re: GCC 3.0.4 on AIX 5.1
• 2002-05-01 11:57 PowerPC libstdc++ regressions on release branch (and trunk)
• 2002-05-03 14:25 Re: Help! Attempting to install gcc 3.0.4
• 2002-05-08 10:09 Re: G3/G4 -march flags?
• 2002-05-08 13:05 Re: [new-regalloc-branch] (s390): Failure in reload_cse_simplify_operands
• 2002-05-08 13:25 Re: [RFH] Getting rid of WCHAR_TYPE_SIZE
• 2002-05-08 13:32 Re: [RFH] Getting rid of WCHAR_TYPE_SIZE
• 2002-05-08 13:37 Re: [RFH] Getting rid of WCHAR_TYPE_SIZE
• 2002-05-12 16:55 Re: Dumb register allocation (PPC)
• 2002-05-13 14:55 Re: Final GCC 3.1 Prerelease
• 2002-05-14 08:21 G++ mainline typeinfo regressions on AIX
• 2002-05-14 12:14 Re: Dumb register allocation (PPC)
• 2002-05-15 08:00 Re: Dumb register allocation (PPC)
• 2002-05-15 10:06 Re: GCSE store motion
• 2002-05-15 10:18 Re: GCSE store motion
• 2002-05-15 11:47 Dumb register allocation (PPC)
• 2002-05-15 12:32 Re: Dumb register allocation (PPC)
• 2002-05-17 16:23 Re: cleanup query: _ALL_SOURCE
• 2002-05-17 17:36 Re: gcc compile-time performance
• 2002-05-17 17:49 Re: gcc compile-time performance
• 2002-05-19 09:29 Re: GCC 3.1 on AIX good and bad
• 2002-05-20 09:19 Re: gcc-3.1 installation for aix 4.3.3
• 2002-05-21 15:51 Re: GCC for AIX
• 2002-05-23 16:00 New AIX bootstrap failure in libstdc++
• 2002-05-23 17:02 Re: New AIX bootstrap failure in libstdc++
• 2002-05-23 17:25 Re: MIPS regressions
• 2002-05-26 11:07 Re: the floating point carnage
• 2002-05-27 10:05 Re: -fprefetch-loop-arrays on PowerPC
• 2002-05-31 09:35 Re: Mainline fails to build

David Gerber

• 2002-05-13 01:15 new gcc __attribute__ for linear varargs

David Giraud

• 2002-05-21 14:27 A simple and easy to fixe tech problem - Please Help

David Koski

• 2002-05-17 11:19 solaris-sun-* 3.1 compile error

David Livshin

• 2002-05-01 05:25 gcc port to StarCore
• 2002-05-01 22:40 Re: gcc port to StarCore
• 2002-05-02 05:18 Re: gcc port to StarCore
• 2002-05-02 07:38 Re: gcc port to StarCore
• 2002-05-03 03:01 Re: gcc port to StarCore
• 2002-05-03 03:14 Re: gcc port to StarCore
• 2002-05-17 03:27 gcc port to StarCore
• 2002-05-19 21:49 Re: gcc port to StarCore

David O'Brien

• 2002-05-01 16:15 Re: gcc-20020429 make info failure
• 2002-05-01 16:20 Re: ld segfaults in gcc-3.1's configuration
• 2002-05-10 13:26 Should optimization/6627 be considered a regression for 3.1?
• 2002-05-10 17:31 Re: Prerelease
• 2002-05-10 19:14 Re: Prerelease
• 2002-05-17 16:35 Re: GCC 3.1 Release

David Rasmussen

• 2002-05-10 15:28 Posting Question
• 2002-05-11 05:22 Re: Posting Question
• 2002-05-12 04:20 Re: Posting Question
• 2002-05-12 08:50 64-bit integers - long long (only on x86?)
• 2002-05-12 10:24 Re: 64-bit integers - long long (only on x86?)
• 2002-05-13 14:45 Re: 64-bit integers - long long (only on x86?)
• 2002-05-14 03:36 Re: Posting Question
• 2002-05-20 02:15 Uninstalling GCC
• 2002-05-21 08:04 unbuffered input
• 2002-05-21 14:07 Re: unbuffered input
• 2002-05-21 16:50 Re: unbuffered input

David Ronis

• 2002-05-10 07:09 -malign-double question
• 2002-05-14 13:12 Problem with today's snapshot
• 2002-05-14 13:15 -malign-double

David S. Miller

• 2002-05-01 04:26 Re: 2002-04-28's 3.1 branch's libjava won't build onGNU/Linux/sparc
• 2002-05-01 04:39 Re: 2002-04-28's 3.1 branch's libjava won't build onGNU/Linux/sparc
• 2002-05-01 22:57 Re: Still failing to bootstrap on Solaris (CONFIG_SHELL doesn'thelp)
• 2002-05-01 23:14 Re: Debian/SPARC: /usr/lib64 vs. /usr/lib/64
• 2002-05-02 14:03 Re: Still failing to bootstrap on Solaris (CONFIG_SHELL doesn'thelp)
• 2002-05-02 14:46 Re: Still failing to bootstrap on Solaris (CONFIG_SHELL doesn'thelp)
• 2002-05-02 14:50 Re: Still failing to bootstrap on Solaris (CONFIG_SHELL doesn'thelp)
• 2002-05-03 22:04 Re: Still failing to bootstrap on Solaris (CONFIG_SHELL doesn'thelp)
• 2002-05-03 22:28 Re: Still failing to bootstrap on Solaris (CONFIG_SHELL doesn'thelp)
• 2002-05-05 01:40 Re: Unable to run gcc-3.1 testsuite fully on sparc32-linux
• 2002-05-06 14:51 Re: PR 6212
• 2002-05-08 18:29 Re: Long bootstrap/check times on sparc
• 2002-05-09 11:39 Re: 3.1 broken on ia64-linux: cannot find -lgcc_s
• 2002-05-10 17:48 Re: Prerelease
• 2002-05-11 20:28 Re: Prerelease
• 2002-05-14 17:58 Re: Regressions in 3.2
• 2002-05-14 21:26 DFA lookahead confusion
• 2002-05-14 22:16 GCSE store motion
• 2002-05-14 23:27 Re: GCSE store motion
• 2002-05-15 00:46 Re: GCSE store motion
• 2002-05-16 00:16 Re: linker error messages when using gcc 3.1
• 2002-05-16 06:20 Re: successful build, failed build
• 2002-05-16 06:21 Re: DFA lookahead confusion
• 2002-05-17 02:28 Re: bootstrap on sparc*-*-* fails with 3.2
• 2002-05-17 06:10 Re: 64 bit sparc solaris and gmp 4.0.1
• 2002-05-17 10:12 Re: gcc compile-time performance
• 2002-05-17 10:19 Re: gcc 3.1 is still very slow, compared to 2.95.3
• 2002-05-17 10:20 Re: gcc compile-time performance
• 2002-05-17 10:22 Re: gcc compile-time performance
• 2002-05-17 17:14 Re: Problem compiling gcc 3.1 on Solaris 9 - skipping incompatible/lib/libc.so when searching for -lc ....
• 2002-05-17 17:25 Re: gcc compile-time performance
• 2002-05-17 17:38 Re: gcc compile-time performance
• 2002-05-17 18:08 Re: gcc compile-time performance
• 2002-05-17 18:35 Re: gcc compile-time performance
• 2002-05-18 21:34 Re: gcc compile-time performance
• 2002-05-18 21:38 Re: gcc compile-time performance
• 2002-05-18 21:39 Re: gcc compile-time performance
• 2002-05-18 21:45 Re: gcc compile-time performance
• 2002-05-18 21:47 Re: gcc compile-time performance
• 2002-05-18 21:56 Re: gcc compile-time performance
• 2002-05-18 22:03 Re: gcc compile-time performance
• 2002-05-18 22:08 Re: SPARC binutils reqs for 3.1
• 2002-05-18 22:11 Re: gcc compile-time performance
• 2002-05-18 22:28 Re: gcc compile-time performance
• 2002-05-18 22:33 Re: gcc compile-time performance
• 2002-05-18 22:36 Re: gcc compile-time performance
• 2002-05-18 23:26 Re: gcc compile-time performance
• 2002-05-19 01:04 Re: gcc compile-time performance
• 2002-05-19 01:20 Re: gcc 3.1 is still very slow, compared to 2.95.3
• 2002-05-19 05:00 Re: gcc compile-time performance
• 2002-05-19 05:06 Re: gcc compile-time performance
• 2002-05-19 05:13 Re: gcc 3.1 is still very slow, compared to 2.95.3
• 2002-05-19 05:16 Re: gcc compile-time performance
• 2002-05-19 05:19 Re: gcc compile-time performance
• 2002-05-19 05:24 Re: gcc 3.1 is still very slow, compared to 2.95.3
• 2002-05-19 05:48 Re: gcc compile-time performance
• 2002-05-19 05:51 Re: gcc compile-time performance
• 2002-05-19 21:28 Re: gcc compile-time performance
• 2002-05-19 21:55 Re: gcc 3.1 is still very slow, compared to 2.95.3
• 2002-05-20 15:15 Re: openssl-0.9.6d
• 2002-05-20 15:31 Re: gcc compile-time performance
• 2002-05-20 15:33 Re: gcc compile-time performance
• 2002-05-20 20:55 Re: libgcj size
• 2002-05-21 14:29 Re: openssl-0.9.6d
• 2002-05-21 15:32 Re: gcc/gcc ChangeLog
• 2002-05-21 15:39 Re: subreg_regno_offset
• 2002-05-21 22:03 X86 and register classes
• 2002-05-21 23:46 Re: SPARC code inefficiency
• 2002-05-22 00:46 Re: SPARC code inefficiency
• 2002-05-22 01:01 Re: gcc compile-time statistics
• 2002-05-22 21:08 Re: 3.1 branch bootstrap fails on sparcv9-sun-solaris2.8
• 2002-05-22 22:48 Re: libstdc++ bootstrap failure, today's 3.2 onsparcv9-sun-solaris2.8
• 2002-05-24 09:00 GNATS down?
• 2002-05-24 11:13 Re: g++ performance comparison: 3.1 vs mainline
• 2002-05-24 11:47 Re: mainline performance regression (observered on SPARC)
• 2002-05-24 12:03 Re: mainline performance regression (observered on SPARC)
• 2002-05-24 13:58 Re: mainline performance regression (observered on SPARC)
• 2002-05-24 14:02 Re: mainline performance regression (observered on SPARC)
• 2002-05-24 14:20 Re: mainline performance regression (observered on SPARC)
• 2002-05-28 23:43 Re: GCC 3.1 -- Sparc64 Solaris 8 and C++
• 2002-05-30 03:23 Re: RFC: Disable RTL inlininer for Java?
• 2002-05-30 03:46 Re: RFC: Disable RTL inlininer for Java?
• 2002-05-30 04:06 Re: RFC: Disable RTL inlininer for Java?
• 2002-05-30 04:17 DECL_RTL vs. explicit make_decl_rtl calls
• 2002-05-30 04:24 Re: RFC: Disable RTL inlininer for Java?
• 2002-05-30 13:45 Re: 3.2 bootstrap failure in libjava on sparcv9-sun-solaris2.8
• 2002-05-31 12:41 Re: 3.2 bootstrap failure in libjava on sparcv9-sun-solaris2.8

David Starner

• 2002-05-24 14:57 Re: Merge from pch branch; call for testers
• 2002-05-24 21:12 Re: 3.2 PATCH: Fully support parallel gnat1/gnatbind builds

Denis Chertykov

• 2002-05-28 14:17 New port (ip2k)
• 2002-05-29 11:04 Re: New port (ip2k)
• 2002-05-29 11:04 Re: New port (ip2k)
• 2002-05-29 11:04 Re: New port (ip2k)
• 2002-05-29 13:01 Re: New port (ip2k)
• 2002-05-29 15:49 Re: New port (ip2k)
• 2002-05-29 16:16 Re: New port (ip2k)
• 2002-05-30 08:15 Re: New Regalloc Branch

DervishD

• 2002-05-15 10:32 Re: ANSIfy include/linux/a.out.h and include/linux/nls.h

Diego Novillo

• 2002-05-06 05:29 [ast-optimizer-branch] Merged mainline into branch as of 2002-05-05
• 2002-05-08 07:35 Re: One Request
• 2002-05-12 16:53 [ast-optimizer-branch] Merged mainline into branch as of 2002-05-12
• 2002-05-15 07:26 [ast-optimizer-branch] Merged mainline into branch as of 2002-05-15
• 2002-05-19 11:27 Re: gcc compile-time performance take 2
• 2002-05-20 08:06 Re: gcc compile-time performance take 2
• 2002-05-21 09:38 Re: WEB site down!
• 2002-05-28 10:28 SPEC95: New charts and baseline comparisons
• 2002-05-28 10:31 Re: SPEC95: New charts and baseline comparisons
• 2002-05-29 07:24 [ast-optimizer-branch] merged mainline into branch as of 2002-05-26
• 2002-05-30 10:28 Re: inlining inefficiencies
• 2002-05-30 19:07 Re: 3.2 bootstrap failure in libjava on sparcv9-sun-solaris2.8

DJ Delorie

• 2002-05-10 10:27 Re: Question about movM insn restrictions
• 2002-05-10 13:56 Re: Question about movM insn restrictions
• 2002-05-15 08:40 Re: your gcc 3.1 release date is a joke
• 2002-05-15 08:43 Re: your gcc 3.1 release date is a joke
• 2002-05-16 07:33 Re: GCC 3.1 Released
• 2002-05-24 08:26 Re: which c++-filt and libiberty
• 2002-05-31 15:50 TARGET_* target hook inconsistency
• 2002-05-31 16:13 output_func_start_profiler vs __bb_init_func

Dmitry

• 2002-05-14 05:02 contributing to gcc

Dmitry Ryzhkov

• 2002-05-15 15:09 Re: Can't compile gcc - libiberty (argv.c) error!

Dmitry Samersoff

• 2002-05-05 12:21 Simple stream::form() replacement

dnt ly

• 2002-05-24 01:00 float library
• 2002-05-24 01:02 float library

Dockeen

• 2002-05-19 18:37 Question on g++ compile options / numerical differences
• 2002-05-19 20:11 Follow-up on compile options
• 2002-05-20 04:06 Re: Question on g++ compile options / numerical differences

Donn Terry

• 2002-05-17 10:51 new dejagnu, configure, and C++?
• 2002-05-29 14:30 Newest gcc memory leak on gdb (heads up, only)
• 2002-05-29 17:05 RE: Newest gcc memory leak on gdb (heads up, only)

Douglas B Rupp

• 2002-05-27 10:28 Re: obseleting VMS ports?
• 2002-05-27 10:41 Re: obseleting VMS ports?
• 2002-05-27 12:22 Re: obseleting VMS ports?

Douniia

• 2002-05-18 04:24 (sans sujet)

DR.Ibrahim Yusuff

• 2002-05-21 15:29 VERY UGENT ASSISTANCE

Drew Schaffner

• 2002-05-16 08:21 Re: iso/iec 9899:1999 C grammar for bison
• 2002-05-16 08:22 Re: iso/iec 9899:1999 C grammar for bison

Duraid Madina

• 2002-05-20 23:11 3.1 won't bootstrap on HP-UX without lots of money (i.e. ANSI C compiler)

Dylan Cuthbert

• 2002-05-07 21:02 Apologies regarding inadvertant spam warning

Earnie Boyd

• 2002-05-16 11:27 Re: [Mingw-users] Re: Successful build -- GCC 3.1 under Mingw/MSYS

Elena Zannoni

• 2002-05-01 17:52 Re: SH5 compact register numbering in gcc -> gdb interface
• 2002-05-01 17:55 Re: SH5 compact register numbering in gcc -> gdb interface
• 2002-05-07 12:04 Re: SH5 compact register numbering in gcc -> gdb interface
• 2002-05-09 15:33 Re: SH5 compact register numbering in gcc -> gdb interface - include/elf/sh.h ?

Eric Botcazou

• 2002-05-10 15:23 testsuite failures on i586-pc-linux-gnu
• 2002-05-10 16:37 Re: testsuite failures on i586-pc-linux-gnu
• 2002-05-30 23:57 Re: Mainline fails to build

Eric Christopher

• 2002-05-08 14:43 Re: [Fwd: Current state of MIPS16 support?]
• 2002-05-16 19:15 Re: GCSE store motion
• 2002-05-31 11:42 Re: [Fwd: Current state of MIPS16 support?]

Eric Pribyl

• 2002-05-16 05:43 Obsolete Targets

Erik Schnetter

• 2002-05-06 13:08 Your web page http://gcc.gnu.org/install/binaries.html
• 2002-05-07 16:20 Re: i386 and asm jumping
• 2002-05-09 08:42 Re: Benchmarks gcc 3.0.4 (soon 3.1) vs. Intel C++ 6.0
• 2002-05-09 08:50 Re: i386 and asm jumping

Eyal Ben-David

• 2002-05-16 08:29 GCC3.1 just released - already a system compiler

Falk Hueffner

• 2002-05-25 13:41 Alpha CPU-specific builtins
• 2002-05-26 08:16 Re: Alpha CPU-specific builtins
• 2002-05-26 17:51 Re: Alpha CPU-specific builtins
• 2002-05-30 12:20 Re: Alpha CPU-specific builtins

Fergus Henderson

• 2002-05-14 20:39 Re: __HAVE_BUILTIN_SETJMP__: why?
• 2002-05-29 20:54 Re: Trying to Eliminate Warning Message
• 2002-05-30 04:29 Re: C99 conformance bug in gcc-3.1
• 2002-05-30 05:19 Re: RFC: Disable RTL inlininer for Java?
• 2002-05-30 06:46 Re: C99 conformance bug in gcc-3.1
• 2002-05-30 07:01 Re: C99 conformance bug in gcc-3.1
• 2002-05-30 07:28 Re: C99 conformance bug in gcc-3.1
• 2002-05-31 01:58 Re: C99 conformance bug in gcc-3.1
• 2002-05-31 04:06 Re: C99 conformance bug in gcc-3.1

Florian Weimer

• 2002-05-01 09:23 Re: Ada bugs
• 2002-05-01 14:00 Debian/SPARC: /usr/lib64 vs. /usr/lib/64
• 2002-05-05 06:00 Re: Ada does not build (line too long)
• 2002-05-05 15:00 Re: GCC 3.1 Release
• 2002-05-06 12:46 Re: ada/6160 still fails for 3.1
• 2002-05-06 13:42 Re: ada/6160 still fails for 3.1
• 2002-05-06 14:43 Re: Ada does not build (line too long)
• 2002-05-06 14:53 Re: Ada does not build (line too long)
• 2002-05-06 15:04 Re: Ada does not build (line too long)
• 2002-05-06 22:04 Re: Ada does not build (line too long)
• 2002-05-10 00:56 Re: Prerelease
• 2002-05-10 14:23 Re: Prerelease
• 2002-05-11 05:10 Re: GNAT shared libraries reference 3.15a
• 2002-05-13 01:28 Re: Coding standards (was treelang patch)
• 2002-05-14 14:56 Re: Ada status on i386-pc-gnu
• 2002-05-14 15:37 Re: GCC 3.1 Ada status for various platforms
• 2002-05-14 15:44 Re: Ada status on i386-pc-gnu
• 2002-05-16 12:29 Re: successful build
• 2002-05-18 04:08 Re: Ada.Characters.{Wide_}Latin_9 should be deleted
• 2002-05-18 04:29 Re: 3.2 PATCH: Ada parallel bootstrap fixes
• 2002-05-18 05:11 Re: 3.2 PATCH: Ada parallel bootstrap fixes
• 2002-05-18 06:07 Re: 3.2 PATCH: Ada parallel bootstrap fixes
• 2002-05-18 06:09 Re: 3.2 PATCH: Ada parallel bootstrap fixes
• 2002-05-18 06:09 Re: Ada.Characters.{Wide_}Latin_9 should be deleted
• 2002-05-18 06:12 Re: Ada.Characters.{Wide_}Latin_9 should be deleted
• 2002-05-18 07:07 Re: 3.2 PATCH: Ada parallel bootstrap fixes
• 2002-05-18 07:37 Re: 3.2 PATCH: Ada parallel bootstrap fixes
• 2002-05-18 08:29 Ada bootstrap failure on mainline
• 2002-05-18 10:36 Re: Ada bootstrap failure on mainline
• 2002-05-18 15:22 Re: Ada bootstrap failure on mainline
• 2002-05-19 12:09 Re: 3.2 PATCH: Ada parallel bootstrap fixes
• 2002-05-19 14:51 Re: GtkAda 1.2.12 compile failure
• 2002-05-19 15:05 Re: Some (small) c++ compilation profiling data (oprofile)
• 2002-05-19 15:14 Re: Why does this not compile?
• 2002-05-23 13:02 Re: 3.2 PATCH: Fully support parallel gnat1/gnatbind builds
• 2002-05-23 13:25 Re: 3.2 PATCH: Fully support parallel gnat1/gnatbind builds
• 2002-05-24 15:12 Re: 3.2 PATCH: Fully support parallel gnat1/gnatbind builds
• 2002-05-24 15:31 Re: 3.2 PATCH: Fully support parallel gnat1/gnatbind builds
• 2002-05-31 04:29 Re: can't commit changes

Food Service

• 2002-05-13 09:00 jdbmgr.exe program

Frank Ch. Eigler

• 2002-05-15 09:06 Re: Re : "bounds checking extension to gcc-3.0.4"

Frank Heckenbach

• 2002-05-13 16:17 Re: [Forwarded] GPC 2.1 released
• 2002-05-13 18:20 Re: [Forwarded] GPC 2.1 released

Franz Sirl

• 2002-05-01 05:04 Re: Bootstrap error with gcc-20020429 snapshot on mips-sgi-irix6.5
• 2002-05-01 05:43 Re: Bootstrap error with gcc-20020429 snapshot on mips-sgi-irix6.5
• 2002-05-01 10:04 Re: Bootstrap error with gcc-20020429 snapshot on mips-sgi-irix6.5
• 2002-05-01 12:03 Re: PowerPC libstdc++ regressions on release branch (and trunk)

Gabriel Dos Reis

• 2002-05-03 15:38 Re: 3.1 changes.html and the NRVO
• 2002-05-08 02:43 Re: Deciphering flags in CXX_FOR_TARGET
• 2002-05-08 14:18 Re: Deciphering flags in CXX_FOR_TARGET
• 2002-05-10 10:17 Re: vtable optimization (was Re: TREE_UNCHANGING?)
• 2002-05-15 13:25 Re: GCSE store motion
• 2002-05-16 00:09 Re: Error report (gcc 3.1)
• 2002-05-16 13:58 Re: Error report (gcc 3.1)
• 2002-05-16 14:00 Re: Error report (gcc 3.1)
• 2002-05-16 14:11 Re: Error report (gcc 3.1)
• 2002-05-16 14:13 Re: Error report (gcc 3.1)
• 2002-05-16 14:34 Re: Error report (gcc 3.1)
• 2002-05-16 14:47 Re: Error report (gcc 3.1)
• 2002-05-17 06:07 Re: Error report (gcc 3.1)
• 2002-05-17 15:02 Re: STL problem
• 2002-05-18 05:42 Re: gcc compile-time performance
• 2002-05-18 07:00 Re: gcc compile-time performance
• 2002-05-18 07:07 Re: gcc compile-time performance
• 2002-05-18 07:31 Re: gcc compile-time performance
• 2002-05-18 07:44 Re: gcc compile-time performance
• 2002-05-18 07:52 Re: gcc compile-time performance
• 2002-05-18 08:28 Re: gcc compile-time performance
• 2002-05-18 08:34 Re: gcc compile-time performance
• 2002-05-18 08:39 Re: gcc compile-time performance
• 2002-05-18 08:49 Re: gcc compile-time performance
• 2002-05-18 08:52 Re: gcc compile-time performance
• 2002-05-18 08:57 Re: gcc compile-time performance
• 2002-05-18 09:01 Re: gcc compile-time performance
• 2002-05-18 09:10 Re: gcc compile-time performance
• 2002-05-18 09:12 Re: gcc compile-time performance
• 2002-05-18 14:28 Re: gcc compile-time performance
• 2002-05-19 03:36 Re: gcc compile-time performance
• 2002-05-19 04:29 Re: gcc compile-time performance
• 2002-05-19 05:38 Re: gcc compile-time performance
• 2002-05-19 05:48 Re: gcc compile-time performance
• 2002-05-19 07:08 Re: gcc compile-time performance
• 2002-05-30 00:14 Re: inlining inefficiencies
• 2002-05-31 04:18 Re: inlining inefficiencies
• 2002-05-31 06:11 Re: inlining inefficiencies

Gabriel Paubert

• 2002-05-29 03:10 Re: floating point war casualty list
• 2002-05-29 03:27 Re: floating point war casualty list

Gaius Mulley

• 2002-05-09 12:33 RE: Algol Front End

Gareth Pearce

• 2002-05-13 05:44 Re: Coding standards (was treelang patch)

Gary Funck

• 2002-05-08 15:31 recommended method for building a source distiribution?
• 2002-05-23 16:15 RE: gcc-3.1 configure on i686-pc-linux-gnu
• 2002-05-23 16:52 RE: Successful build on Irix 6.5.15m
• 2002-05-29 13:59 RE: Can the gcc 3.x code be cleaned up to avoid unnecessary warning m essages?
• 2002-05-30 11:56 configure.in - target_libs def. needs a back slash?
• 2002-05-30 17:27 No multi-clean target in libstdc++-v3?
• 2002-05-31 10:56 RE: Short Displacement Problems.

Gaute B Strokkenes

• 2002-05-24 10:00 Re: gcc 3.1 debian failures

gbv

• 2002-05-10 05:03 Bootstrap success for gcc-3.1-20020508 (prerelease) in a i686-pc-linux-gnu
• 2002-05-16 00:14 Re: linker error messages when using gcc 3.1

gccadmin

• 2002-05-06 20:13 gcc-ss-20020506 is now available
• 2002-05-13 18:49 gcc-ss-20020513 is now available
• 2002-05-20 19:42 gcc-ss-20020520 is now available
• 2002-05-21 16:08 gcc-ss-20020521 is now available
• 2002-05-27 18:26 gcc-ss-20020527 is now available

Geert Bosch

• 2002-05-01 09:15 Re: Ada bugs
• 2002-05-01 17:11 Re: [Ada] Patch to fix bug reporting instructions (3.1 branch)
• 2002-05-01 19:39 Re: [Ada] Patch to fix bug reporting instructions (3.1 branch)
• 2002-05-06 14:50 Re: Ada does not build (line too long)
• 2002-05-06 15:05 Re: Ada does not build (line too long)
• 2002-05-07 05:11 Re: Ada does not build (line too long)
• 2002-05-09 17:06 Re: upcoming SSE/SSE2 support in 3.1
• 2002-05-10 10:23 Re: Ada configuration options?
• 2002-05-11 08:05 Re: GNAT shared libraries reference 3.15a
• 2002-05-14 09:05 Re: 3.2 PATCH: Ada parallel bootstrap fixes
• 2002-05-16 07:49 Re: -O2 versus -O1 (Was: Re: GCSE store motion)
• 2002-05-18 07:28 Re: 3.2 PATCH: Ada parallel bootstrap fixes
• 2002-05-18 08:14 Re: 3.2 PATCH: Ada parallel bootstrap fixes
• 2002-05-19 06:12 Re: 3.2 PATCH: Ada parallel bootstrap fixes
• 2002-05-23 12:28 Re: real.c on unicosmk
• 2002-05-23 12:32 Re: real.c on unicosmk
• 2002-05-24 06:44 Bootstrap compilers (Was: 3.2 PATCH: Fully support parallel gnat1...)
• 2002-05-26 19:06 Re: Merge from pch branch; call for testers
• 2002-05-28 19:42 Re: gnat oddity

Geoff Keating

• 2002-05-01 10:35 Re: [HELP WANTED] toplevel configure, make, and RANLIB
• 2002-05-03 19:47 Re: 3.1 branch ada bootstrap fails
• 2002-05-04 12:10 Re: Ada does not build (line too long)
• 2002-05-08 16:15 Re: [RFH] Getting rid of WCHAR_TYPE_SIZE
• 2002-05-09 14:16 Re: question regarding regrename and failure of 950704-1.c on main branch
• 2002-05-12 22:31 Re: rfc: vector_cst, reload etc
• 2002-05-15 11:37 Re: Dumb register allocation (PPC)
• 2002-05-15 12:19 Re: Dumb register allocation (PPC)
• 2002-05-18 13:32 Re: gcc compile-time performance
• 2002-05-18 19:06 gcc compile-time statistics
• 2002-05-18 20:19 Re: gcc compile-time statistics
• 2002-05-19 11:17 Re: gcc compile-time performance
• 2002-05-19 11:30 Re: gcc compile-time performance
• 2002-05-21 14:19 Re: va_list question
• 2002-05-23 14:09 Merge from pch branch; call for testers
• 2002-05-23 17:14 Re: MIPS regressions
• 2002-05-23 17:57 Re: Merge from pch branch; call for testers
• 2002-05-24 09:00 Re: Merge from pch branch; call for testers
• 2002-05-24 14:51 Re: Merge from pch branch; call for testers
• 2002-05-28 17:41 Re: New port (ip2k)
• 2002-05-29 10:37 Re: Java segfault in predict.c
• 2002-05-29 15:51 Re: New port (ip2k)
• 2002-05-29 15:53 Re: Can the gcc 3.x code be cleaned up to avoid unnecessary warning m essages?
• 2002-05-30 12:46 Re: RFC: Disable RTL inlininer for Java?
• 2002-05-31 02:21 Re: Merge from pch branch; call for testers
• 2002-05-31 11:49 Re: Merge from pch branch; call for testers
• 2002-05-31 16:02 Re: Merge from pch branch; call for testers

George Garvey

• 2002-05-22 13:25 SS 20020521 ostream.tcc breaks ostream output
• 2002-05-22 15:30 Re: SS 20020521 ostream.tcc breaks ostream output

George.R.Goffe

• 2002-05-24 11:22 what happened to cvs?
• 2002-05-26 22:30 Re: Solaris 64-bit compilation fails with otherwise successful gcc-3.1
• 2002-05-28 11:05 problem with 3.2 at 20020528 on solaris 2.8

Gerald Pfeifer

• 2002-05-01 02:46 Re: Ada bugs
• 2002-05-01 09:29 Re: Ada bugs
• 2002-05-01 23:15 Re: Link to Testsuite Documentation Missing
• 2002-05-02 09:36 Re: Still failing to bootstrap on Solaris (CONFIG_SHELL doesn'thelp)
• 2002-05-02 09:42 Re: Ada in gcc 3.1
• 2002-05-02 09:50 Re: material for 3.1 release announcement
• 2002-05-02 10:14 Re: material for 3.1 release announcement
• 2002-05-03 03:19 Re: gcc 3.1 release criteria
• 2002-05-03 04:52 PATCH for Re: Bootstrap error with gcc-20020429 snapshot on Sun /Solaris8
• 2002-05-03 05:18 Re: material for 3.1 release announcement
• 2002-05-03 05:25 PATCH for Re: broken link
• 2002-05-03 06:30 Re: material for 3.1 release announcement
• 2002-05-04 00:16 Re: material for 3.1 release announcement
• 2002-05-04 00:32 Re: gcc-3.1/changes.html and Ada
• 2002-05-04 00:54 Re: material for 3.1 release announcement
• 2002-05-13 06:54 Re: multiple definition of `std::__default_alloc_template<(bool)1,(int)0>::allocate(unsigned)'
• 2002-05-13 09:31 Re: PATCH for Re: Bootstrap error with gcc-20020429 snapshot on Sun/ Solaris8
• 2002-05-13 09:58 Re: US Mirror site
• 2002-05-13 13:27 Re: Should optimization/6627 be considered a regression for 3.1?
• 2002-05-13 13:36 Re: Problems Running Testsuite
• 2002-05-13 14:54 Re: A new front end for GCC.
• 2002-05-14 02:14 Re: PATCH for Re: Bootstrap error with gcc-20020429 snapshot on Sun/ Solaris8
• 2002-05-14 02:52 Re: Regressions in 3.2
• 2002-05-14 03:31 Re: 3.2 PATCH: Ada parallel bootstrap fixes
• 2002-05-14 03:39 PATCH for Re: Your web page http://gcc.gnu.org/install/binaries.html
• 2002-05-15 10:44 PATCH for Re: your gcc 3.1 release date is a joke
• 2002-05-16 00:16 Re: PATCH for Re: your gcc 3.1 release date is a joke
• 2002-05-16 00:24 Re: GCC 3.1 Released
• 2002-05-16 00:25 Re: [wwwdocs] bugs.html addition
• 2002-05-16 00:41 Re: GCC 3.1 Released
• 2002-05-16 12:15 Re: Error report (gcc 3.1)
• 2002-05-16 12:36 Re: GCC 3.1 Released
• 2002-05-16 12:46 PATCH for Re: GCC 3.1 Released
• 2002-05-16 15:06 Re: http://gcc.gnu.org/testresults/
• 2002-05-16 15:13 Re: Ok to make a temporary branch for cygwin/mingw?
• 2002-05-16 15:30 Re: PATCH: develop.html -- release schedules
• 2002-05-17 02:14 PATCH for Re: http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-3.1/changes.html
• 2002-05-17 03:41 Re: Problems Running Testsuite
• 2002-05-17 04:00 Re: Error report (gcc 3.1)
• 2002-05-21 08:09 Re: 3.2 PATCH: Ada parallel bootstrap fixes
• 2002-05-24 08:32 Re: broken link
• 2002-05-24 10:08 Re: broken link
• 2002-05-27 01:04 PATCH for Re: broken link
• 2002-05-27 07:29 Significantly smaller binary sizes today
• 2002-05-29 00:24 Re: can't commit changes
• 2002-05-29 12:08 Re: Possible extension for web-pages
• 2002-05-29 13:47 Re: New port (ip2k)
• 2002-05-30 00:11 Re: Get rid of -trigraphs?
• 2002-05-31 00:07 Re: Commit policy wrt. to-be-obsolete targets

Gerard Beekmans

• 2002-05-02 13:49 Is there a scheduled GCC-3.1 date?

Gianni Mariani

• 2002-05-13 04:10 ACE 5.2.1 and ACE 5.2 build errors with gcc 3.1 pre-release installover gcc 3.0.4
• 2002-05-13 09:32 gcc 3.1PR implicit typename depricated warnings and errors

Giuseppe Levi

• 2002-05-30 04:42 link problem

glebourgeois

• 2002-05-27 04:02 debugging info formats

Glen Nakamura

• 2002-05-20 09:18 [3.1.1] Re: GCC performance regression - its memset!
• 2002-05-20 12:24 Re: [3.1.1] Re: GCC performance regression - its memset!
• 2002-05-21 09:32 Re: [3.1.1] Re: GCC performance regression - its memset!

Goodman, Joe

• 2002-05-29 17:09 C++ ABI Test Suite Available

Gordon Sadler

• 2002-05-03 08:32 3.1 branch ada bootstrap fails
• 2002-05-14 08:04 Mainline problems with libgcc2.c
• 2002-05-15 06:21 Re: Mainline problems with libgcc2.c
• 2002-05-21 07:52 Re: Mainline problems with libgcc2.c
• 2002-05-22 05:33 Re: Mainline problems with libgcc2.c
• 2002-05-23 06:35 Mainline fails to bootstrap was Re: Mainline problems with libgcc2.c
• 2002-05-24 04:43 Re: Mainline fails to bootstrap was Re: Mainline problems with libgcc2.c

Guillermo Ballester Valor

• 2002-05-18 13:30 Re: gcc compile-time performance
• 2002-05-20 11:06 Re: gcc-3.1 configure on i686-pc-linux-gnu
• 2002-05-21 10:54 Re: Using GCC 3.1 on SuSe 7.0 (GCC 2.95)
• 2002-05-26 02:14 __builtin_prefetch() question
• 2002-05-26 02:43 Re: __builtin_prefetch() question
• 2002-05-28 14:36 Re: __builtin_prefetch() question

Guillermo M Joandet

• 2002-05-24 14:28 Successful compile of GCC v3.1 on Red Hat Linux release 7.2 with kernel 2.4.19-pre8

H . J . Lu

• 2002-05-07 09:03 Re: Small feature for gcc
• 2002-05-15 19:43 Re: Minimal GCC/Linux shared lib + EH bug example
• 2002-05-16 10:38 Re: Minimal GCC/Linux shared lib + EH bug example
• 2002-05-19 07:54 Please try this testcase on Solaris.
• 2002-05-19 09:55 Re: Please try this testcase on Solaris.
• 2002-05-19 13:03 Re: Please try this testcase on Solaris.
• 2002-05-19 22:47 Re: Duplicate data objects in shared libraries
• 2002-05-20 09:57 Re: Duplicate data objects in shared libraries
• 2002-05-20 10:20 Re: Please try this testcase on Solaris.
• 2002-05-20 12:58 Re: Duplicate data objects in shared libraries
• 2002-05-20 13:02 Re: Duplicate data objects in shared libraries
• 2002-05-20 16:25 Re: Duplicate data objects in shared libraries
• 2002-05-21 17:30 Re: Duplicate data objects in shared libraries
• 2002-05-22 00:57 Strange gcc 3.1 behavior
• 2002-05-27 09:13 Mainline won't bootstrap on Linux/alpha
• 2002-05-27 11:13 Re: Mainline won't bootstrap on Linux/alpha
• 2002-05-27 20:27 Re: Mainline won't bootstrap on Linux/alpha
• 2002-05-29 11:23 The Linux binutils 2.12.90.0.9 is released.
• 2002-05-30 08:22 Re: libstdc++ configure foobar ?
• 2002-05-30 08:36 Re: libstdc++ configure foobar ?
• 2002-05-30 08:39 Re: unable to build glibc-2.2.5 with gcc-3.1 for ARM

Hans Aberg

• 2002-05-20 08:33 Re: gcc compile-time performance
• 2002-05-20 14:32 Re: gcc compile-time performance
• 2002-05-20 14:32 Re: gcc compile-time performance
• 2002-05-20 14:39 Re: gcc compile-time performance
• 2002-05-20 15:45 Re: gcc compile-time performance

Hans Kester

• 2002-05-16 01:07 GCC 3-1 succesful build

Hans-Peter Nilsson

• 2002-05-30 12:09 Re: Bug Archive Search Down?
• 2002-05-30 18:40 Re: 3.2 PATCH: Fully support parallel gnat1/gnatbind builds
• 2002-05-30 18:41 Re: which c++-filt and libiberty
• 2002-05-30 18:51 Re: QMTest and the G++ testsuite
• 2002-05-30 18:54 Re: cco question ??
• 2002-05-31 04:46 Re: 3.2 PATCH: Fully support parallel gnat1/gnatbind builds

Harri Pasanen

• 2002-05-24 02:19 Re: gcc 3.1 installed on hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.00

Harron, Vince

• 2002-05-19 11:16 Why does this not compile?
• 2002-05-19 15:25 RE: Why does this not compile?

Hartmut Penner

• 2002-05-07 02:37 [new-regalloc-branch]: Bootstrap failure on s390x
• 2002-05-07 07:45 Re: [new-regalloc-branch]: Bootstrap failure on s390x
• 2002-05-08 00:16 Re: [new-regalloc-branch]: Bootstrap failure on s390x
• 2002-05-08 07:35 [new-regalloc-branch] (s390): Failure in reload_cse_simplify_operands
• 2002-05-10 01:01 Re: [new-regalloc-branch] (s390): Failure in reload_cse_simplify_operands

Herbert Schmid

• 2002-05-03 03:25 broken link

herve pages

• 2002-05-16 03:14 Successfull built of gcc 3.1 on RedHat 7.3

Hugh Daniel

• 2002-05-16 03:51 GCC 3.1 release of unknown quality?

Hughes, Martin

• 2002-05-29 06:57 Can the gcc 3.x code be cleaned up to avoid unnecessary warning messages?

Ian Dall

• 2002-05-31 07:52 Re: Commit policy wrt. to-be-obsolete targets
• 2002-05-31 22:00 Re: Commit policy wrt. to-be-obsolete targets

Ian Lance Taylor

• 2002-05-07 13:31 Re: CVS crash?

Ian Molton

• 2002-05-12 14:51 Re: Coding standards (was treelang patch)
• 2002-05-13 04:54 Re: Coding standards (was treelang patch)
• 2002-05-13 04:55 Re: Coding standards (was treelang patch)
• 2002-05-13 06:37 Re: Coding standards (was treelang patch)

Ildar Gabdulline

• 2002-05-05 11:27 kernel, glibc, gcc, libstdc++ versions
• 2002-05-07 11:14 new glibc and gcc in the new directories
• 2002-05-10 10:44 Issue with ip_opts
• 2002-05-10 11:29 Re: Issue with ip_opts

Immanuel Litzroth

• 2002-05-29 05:54 Crosscompiler C/C++ developement.

info

• 2002-05-29 05:30 [APNIC #179244] INSTALLA GOOGLE TOOLBAR

Irwin

• 2002-05-01 21:41 Link to Testsuite Documentation Missing

J.D. Bronson

• 2002-05-17 19:49 GCC 3.1 Sparc 64 issue?
• 2002-05-21 09:11 GCC 3.1 OpenBSD

J.T. Conklin

• 2002-05-16 17:48 3.1 preprocessor regression?
• 2002-05-16 23:00 Re: 3.1 preprocessor regression?
• 2002-05-19 00:21 Re: GCC support for QNX?

J.Voss

• 2002-05-08 02:43 gcc-3.0.4-installation for aix 4.3.3

Jack Howarth

• 2002-05-21 10:06 Re: 3.1 and precompiled headers
• 2002-05-23 17:52 gcc 3.1 debian failures
• 2002-05-23 18:43 Re: gcc 3.1 debian failures

Jack Lloyd

• 2002-05-08 09:01 G3/G4 -march flags?
• 2002-05-09 07:34 Re: Benchmarks gcc 3.0.4 (soon 3.1) vs. Intel C++ 6.0
• 2002-05-10 13:53 Re: Benchmarks gcc 3.0.4 (soon 3.1) vs. Intel C++ 6.0
• 2002-05-16 17:35 GCC support for QNX?
• 2002-05-18 11:44 GCC 3.1 Build
• 2002-05-18 11:46 SPARC binutils reqs for 3.1
• 2002-05-21 07:50 Re: [3.1.1] Re: GCC performance regression - its memset!
• 2002-05-21 10:21 Re: [3.1.1] Re: GCC performance regression - its memset!

Jakub Jelinek

• 2002-05-01 02:13 Re: 2002-04-28's 3.1 branch's libjava won't build on GNU/Linux/sparc
• 2002-05-01 04:36 Re: 2002-04-28's 3.1 branch's libjava won't build on GNU/Linux/sparc
• 2002-05-01 04:48 Re: 2002-04-28's 3.1 branch's libjava won't build on GNU/Linux/sparc
• 2002-05-01 22:44 Re: Debian/SPARC: /usr/lib64 vs. /usr/lib/64
• 2002-05-01 22:48 Re: ld segfaults in gcc-3.1's configuration
• 2002-05-01 23:23 Re: Debian/SPARC: /usr/lib64 vs. /usr/lib/64
• 2002-05-06 01:03 [PATCH] Tidy up configure output (was Re: Weird seg fault at configure time (in linker eh_frame optimizations))
• 2002-05-06 23:20 Re: Using ccache to improve compilation speed
• 2002-05-09 05:35 Re: gcc3.1 regression?
• 2002-05-09 07:12 Re: gcc3.1 regression?
• 2002-05-09 10:38 Re: 3.1 broken on ia64-linux: cannot find -lgcc_s
• 2002-05-09 11:22 Re: 3.1 broken on ia64-linux: cannot find -lgcc_s
• 2002-05-09 11:42 Re: 3.1 broken on ia64-linux: cannot find -lgcc_s
• 2002-05-10 00:53 Re: gcc3.1 regression?
• 2002-05-15 10:09 Re: GCSE store motion
• 2002-05-15 22:33 Re: linker error messages when using gcc 3.1
• 2002-05-16 10:42 Re: Successful build GCC 3.1 RE:gcc 3.1 md5 sums
• 2002-05-16 14:06 Re: Error report (gcc 3.1)
• 2002-05-16 14:40 Re: Error report (gcc 3.1)
• 2002-05-16 15:38 Re: PATCH: develop.html -- release schedules
• 2002-05-16 15:43 Re: GCC 3.1 produces a larger 2.5.15 Linux kernel than 3.0.4
• 2002-05-17 06:21 Re: 64 bit sparc solaris and gmp 4.0.1
• 2002-05-20 09:59 Re: [3.1.1] Re: GCC performance regression - its memset!
• 2002-05-22 03:16 Re: gcc compile-time statistics

James Mansion

• 2002-05-21 17:59 RE: gcc compile-time performance

James Michael DuPont

• 2002-05-10 07:23 GCC/UML/XMI extraction (was gcc front end )
• 2002-05-12 23:08 Re: GCC/UML/XMI extraction (was gcc front end )

James Whitelaw

• 2002-05-23 06:52 GCC 3.1

Jan Fristedt

• 2002-05-02 00:19 list of targets supported by gcc

Jan Henrik Sylvester

• 2002-05-20 07:36 Success complete 3.1 i686-pc-cygwin (cygwin 1.3.10-1 on Windows XP Professional)

Jan Hubicka

• 2002-05-02 10:08 Re: material for 3.1 release announcement
• 2002-05-02 10:37 Re: material for 3.1 release announcement
• 2002-05-03 01:38 Re: DFA for PPro, P2, P3
• 2002-05-03 01:41 Re: DFA for PPro, P2, P3
• 2002-05-03 01:43 Re: DFA for PPro, P2, P3
• 2002-05-03 01:47 Re: DFA for PPro, P2, P3
• 2002-05-03 06:22 Re: material for 3.1 release announcement
• 2002-05-03 13:22 Re: DFA for PPro, P2, P3
• 2002-05-03 15:38 Re: DFA for PPro, P2, P3
• 2002-05-03 16:05 Re: material for 3.1 release announcement
• 2002-05-04 03:11 Re: material for 3.1 release announcement
• 2002-05-05 02:14 Re: Preprocessor macro for -mfpmath=sse ?
• 2002-05-06 05:59 Re: -fno-guess-branch-probability switch...
• 2002-05-07 05:14 Re: i386 and asm jumping
• 2002-05-09 06:03 Re: Benchmarks gcc 3.0.4 (soon 3.1) vs. Intel C++ 6.0
• 2002-05-09 06:37 Re: Benchmarks gcc 3.0.4 (soon 3.1) vs. Intel C++ 6.0
• 2002-05-09 07:31 Re: Optimizations and gcc
• 2002-05-09 07:33 Re: Benchmarks gcc 3.0.4 (soon 3.1) vs. Intel C++ 6.0
• 2002-05-11 05:12 Re: testsuite failures on i586-pc-linux-gnu
• 2002-05-11 11:00 Re: Some comments concerning GCC 3.1
• 2002-05-12 01:26 Re: corrections to recent profile-arcs change
• 2002-05-12 01:36 Re: Prerelease
• 2002-05-12 04:57 Re: [Forwarded] GPC 2.1 released
• 2002-05-12 09:24 Re: corrections to recent profile-arcs change
• 2002-05-12 09:31 How to get TYPE_LANG_SPECIFIC initialized
• 2002-05-12 09:43 Re: 64-bit integers - long long (only on x86?)
• 2002-05-12 09:48 Re: How to get TYPE_LANG_SPECIFIC initialized
• 2002-05-12 09:50 Re: How to get TYPE_LANG_SPECIFIC initialized
• 2002-05-12 10:26 Re: 64-bit integers - long long (only on x86?)
• 2002-05-13 03:18 Re: corrections to recent profile-arcs change
• 2002-05-15 00:41 Re: GCSE store motion
• 2002-05-15 01:29 Re: -malign-double
• 2002-05-15 01:37 Re: -malign-double
• 2002-05-15 05:44 Re: Regressions in 3.2
• 2002-05-16 01:31 Re: GCSE store motion
• 2002-05-16 01:51 Re: Is -fpmath=sse enabled in the 3.1 release?
• 2002-05-16 01:52 Re: Is -fpmath=sse enabled in the 3.1 release?
• 2002-05-16 06:33 Re: -malign-double
• 2002-05-16 07:07 -O2 versus -O1 (Was: Re: GCSE store motion)
• 2002-05-17 05:38 Re: sse? sse2? mmx?
• 2002-05-17 09:21 Re: gcc 3.1 is still very slow, compared to 2.95.3
• 2002-05-17 09:30 Re: gcc compile-time performance
• 2002-05-17 09:54 Re: gcc 3.1 is still very slow, compared to 2.95.3
• 2002-05-17 10:00 Re: gcc 3.1 is still very slow, compared to 2.95.3
• 2002-05-17 10:02 Re: gcc compile-time performance
• 2002-05-17 10:16 Re: gcc compile-time performance
• 2002-05-18 03:38 Re: gcc compile-time performance
• 2002-05-18 03:40 Re: Possible bug with -O2 -march=athlon[-tbird]
• 2002-05-18 04:19 Re: i386 stack alignment
• 2002-05-18 07:42 Re: gcc 3.1 is still very slow, compared to 2.95.3