This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: LittleEndian

From: Toon Moene <toon at moene dot indiv dot nluug dot nl>
To: Allan Sandfeld Jensen <snowwolf at one2one-networks dot com>
Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2002 23:49:08 +0200
Subject: Re: LittleEndian
Organization: Moene Computational Physics, Maartensdijk, The Netherlands
References: <20020429215234.C3DABF28F4@nile.gnat.com> <200204301308.54991.snowwolf@one2one-networks.com> <3CCEFEFF.BC635D5D@moene.indiv.nluug.nl> <200204302308.24902.snowwolf@one2one-networks.com>

Allan Sandfeld Jensen wrote:

> Because it is less code and more elegant. You write one function with one
> endianness. System that has a different can then simultate it, or simply use
> the right one if they support both, like most does by now.

Sure - I hope everyone gets it right for a Canadian Cross, then.

-- 
Toon Moene - mailto:toon@moene.indiv.nluug.nl - phoneto: +31 346 214290
Saturnushof 14, 3738 XG  Maartensdijk, The Netherlands
Maintainer, GNU Fortran 77: http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/g77_news.html
Join GNU Fortran 95: http://g95.sourceforge.net/ (under construction)

References:
- Re: LittleEndian
  - From: Robert Dewar
- Re: LittleEndian
  - From: Allan Sandfeld Jensen
- Re: LittleEndian
  - From: Toon Moene
- Re: LittleEndian
  - From: Allan Sandfeld Jensen

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]