This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: cross target report on gcc 3.1-20020423




Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:
> 
> On Mon, 29 Apr 2002, Joel Sherrill wrote:
> > Rekha Deshmukh wrote:
> > >
> > > Dear Joel!
> > >
> > > As per this report, I came to know that you were able to build the target sh-elf for gcc 3.1,binutis-2.12.
> > > I am too trying the same build, but is failing for me.
> > > Can you please tell me the build machine, native gcc configuration you used?
> > > I tried on RH 6.2 where it gives me the error that the 'gcc is  having buggy 64 bit support'. So I tried on the RH 7.2 it goes further this error but fails somewhere in the make.
> > > Kindly provide the native gcc version you used so that I can upgrade my gcc.
> >
> > I have used RH 5.2, 6.2 and 7.2 over the years to build this.
> 
> Have you tried a recent binutils with RH 6.2?  Since the change
> to 64-bit BFD for sh-* (requested by gdb folks for reasons
> related to sh64), you can't build on stock RH 6.2.  BFD
> configure disallows it, because the egcs-1.1.2 compiler is too
> buggy in 64-bit matters.  Installing gcc-2.95.3 somewhere and
> setting CC to it at least when building 64-bit toolchains is one
> remedy.

I don't have any 6.2 machines at this point.   So this comment
was purely historical.

And my RH 5.2 machine doesn't grok our current RPMs but that isn't
the current specs. :(

> brgds, H-P

-- 
Joel Sherrill, Ph.D.             Director of Research & Development
joel@OARcorp.com                 On-Line Applications Research
Ask me about RTEMS: a free RTOS  Huntsville AL 35805
   Support Available             (256) 722-9985


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]