This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: cross target report on gcc 3.1-20020423
- From: Joel Sherrill <joel dot sherrill at OARcorp dot com>
- To: Hans-Peter Nilsson <hp at bitrange dot com>
- Cc: Rekha Deshmukh <RekhaD at kpit dot com>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2002 21:19:00 -0500
- Subject: Re: cross target report on gcc 3.1-20020423
- Organization: OAR Corporation
- References: <Pine.BSF.4.30.0204291521370.53488-100000@dair.pair.com>
- Reply-to: joel dot sherrill at OARcorp dot com
Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:
>
> On Mon, 29 Apr 2002, Joel Sherrill wrote:
> > Rekha Deshmukh wrote:
> > >
> > > Dear Joel!
> > >
> > > As per this report, I came to know that you were able to build the target sh-elf for gcc 3.1,binutis-2.12.
> > > I am too trying the same build, but is failing for me.
> > > Can you please tell me the build machine, native gcc configuration you used?
> > > I tried on RH 6.2 where it gives me the error that the 'gcc is having buggy 64 bit support'. So I tried on the RH 7.2 it goes further this error but fails somewhere in the make.
> > > Kindly provide the native gcc version you used so that I can upgrade my gcc.
> >
> > I have used RH 5.2, 6.2 and 7.2 over the years to build this.
>
> Have you tried a recent binutils with RH 6.2? Since the change
> to 64-bit BFD for sh-* (requested by gdb folks for reasons
> related to sh64), you can't build on stock RH 6.2. BFD
> configure disallows it, because the egcs-1.1.2 compiler is too
> buggy in 64-bit matters. Installing gcc-2.95.3 somewhere and
> setting CC to it at least when building 64-bit toolchains is one
> remedy.
I don't have any 6.2 machines at this point. So this comment
was purely historical.
And my RH 5.2 machine doesn't grok our current RPMs but that isn't
the current specs. :(
> brgds, H-P
--
Joel Sherrill, Ph.D. Director of Research & Development
joel@OARcorp.com On-Line Applications Research
Ask me about RTEMS: a free RTOS Huntsville AL 35805
Support Available (256) 722-9985