This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: GCC 3.1 Prerelease

From: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>
To: Jason Merrill <jason at redhat dot com>
Cc: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>, Peter Schmid <schmid at snake dot iap dot physik dot tu-darmstadt dot de>, "gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2002 09:04:32 -0700
Subject: Re: GCC 3.1 Prerelease
References: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0204210235010.13395-100000@snake.iap.physik.tu-da<Pine.LNX.4.30.0204210235010.13395-100000@snake.iap.physik.tu-darmstadt.de><3340000.1019348655@gandalf.codesourcery.com><20020421135047.A31524@redhat.com><12250000.1019426436@gandalf.codesourcery.com><wvlelh68u1c.fsf@prospero.cambridge.redhat.com>

--On Tuesday, April 23, 2002 01:43:27 PM +0100 Jason Merrill 
<jason@redhat.com> wrote:

>>>>>> "Mark" == Mark Mitchell <mark@codesourcery.com> writes:
>
>> I'm inclined just to suffer here, but let's see what Jason thinks.
>
> I think I'm inclined to restore the bug on the branch.

That makes some sense.

OK, let's respect your decision.  Would you please undo your change?

I guess we should keep the PR open -- and high priority -- since keeping
the change on the mainline means we already have a known performance
regression to GCC 3.2.

Thanks,

--
Mark Mitchell                   mark@codesourcery.com
CodeSourcery, LLC               http://www.codesourcery.com

References:
- Re: GCC 3.1 Prerelease
  - From: Peter Schmid
- Re: GCC 3.1 Prerelease
  - From: Mark Mitchell
- Re: GCC 3.1 Prerelease
  - From: Richard Henderson
- Re: GCC 3.1 Prerelease
  - From: Mark Mitchell
- Re: GCC 3.1 Prerelease
  - From: Jason Merrill

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]