This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
c99_classification_macros_c.cc
- From: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>
- To: Zack Weinberg <zack at codesourcery dot com>, gdr at codesourcery dot com
- Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2002 03:40:42 -0400
- Subject: c99_classification_macros_c.cc
- References: <200204170019.UAA12284@caip.rutgers.edu> <20020420211827.GR30952@codesourcery.com> <200204212211.SAA13425@caip.rutgers.edu> <20020422012415.GC2627@codesourcery.com> <20020422072533.GA27490@codesourcery.com>
- Reply-to: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>
On Mon, Apr 22, 2002 at 12:25:33AM -0700, Zack Weinberg wrote:
> === libstdc++-v3 tests ===
> FAIL: 26_numerics/c99_classification_macros_c.cc (test for excess errors)
Regarding this test, what is it really trying to test?
Couldn't find any word on mailing lists about it.
>From ISO C99 7.12.3 I understand these are required to be macros by C99
and the test is testing whether they are not macros.
Is C++ required to have its own copy of math.h or what?
Shouldn't the test be at least XFAILed for all glibc platforms?
Jakub