This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: optimizing % CONST_INT

From: "David S. Miller" <davem at redhat dot com>
To: rth at redhat dot com
Cc: dann at godzilla dot ICS dot UCI dot EDU, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2002 00:49:00 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: optimizing % CONST_INT
References: <20020417172620.B23173@redhat.com><200204171828.aa28377@gremlin-relay.ics.uci.edu><20020417235941.B23317@redhat.com>

   From: Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com>
   Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2002 23:59:41 -0700

   To fix this, you need to find out what the branch taken
   and miss penalty is for at least a couple of sparc
   implementations and define the macro accordingly.

I'll take care of this tomorrow, this is the kind of knowledge I have
tucked away in the back corner of my skull :-)

References:
- Re: optimizing % CONST_INT
  - From: Richard Henderson
- Re: optimizing % CONST_INT
  - From: Dan Nicolaescu
- Re: optimizing % CONST_INT
  - From: Richard Henderson

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]