This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: patch/proposal: obsolete configurations in 3.1
- From: 'Zack Weinberg' <zack at codesourcery dot com>
- To: "Dana, Eric" <Eric_Dana at bmc dot com>
- Cc: 'Janis Johnson' <janis187 at us dot ibm dot com>,'Mark Mitchell' <mark at codesourcery dot com>,'Kevin Handy' <kth at srv dot net>, 'Andi Kleen' <ak at suse dot de>,"'gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org'" <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2002 09:20:30 -0700
- Subject: Re: patch/proposal: obsolete configurations in 3.1
- References: <C41D82BF5BACD311B1B600A0C9EAF0CF0659BE68@es01-bos>
On Tue, Apr 16, 2002 at 10:37:49AM -0500, Dana, Eric wrote:
> Janis,
>
> i?86-sequent-sysv4*
>
> This is still in use. We use it at my company.
As far as GCC is concerned, i?86-sequent-sysv4 and i?86-sequent-ptx4
are the same thing, so don't worry, they're both staying.
(This is not to say that they ARE the same thing; only that the
differences, if any, are not significant to GCC's configuration
logic.)
zw