This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: patch/proposal: obsolete configurations in 3.1

From: Andi Kleen <ak at suse dot de>
To: Zack Weinberg <zack at codesourcery dot com>
Cc: Kevin Handy <kth at srv dot net>, Andi Kleen <ak at suse dot de>,gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2002 09:31:38 +0200
Subject: Re: patch/proposal: obsolete configurations in 3.1
References: <20020412194555.GD320@codesourcery.com.suse.lists.egcs-patches> <p731ydib2ve.fsf@oldwotan.suse.de> <3CBA0045.5090401@srv.net> <20020415062313.GC968@codesourcery.com>

On Sun, Apr 14, 2002 at 11:23:13PM -0700, Zack Weinberg wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 14, 2002 at 04:18:45PM -0600, Kevin Handy wrote:
> > Andi Kleen wrote:
> > >
> > >Here are some more proposals: 
> > >
> > >pdp10-*
> > >
> > I wouldn't advise dropping the PDP10, since it is making a
> > resurgance due to the emulators that have become available. I
> > believe this target is actually fairly new.
> 
> There isn't a PDP10 backend in the current official tree.  I know
> people are working on one, though.  Andi, did you mean pdp11?

Yes, pdp11, sorry. But as it seems there are people using it still
it is probably better to keep it.

-Andi

References:
- Re: patch/proposal: obsolete configurations in 3.1
  - From: Andi Kleen
- Re: patch/proposal: obsolete configurations in 3.1
  - From: Kevin Handy
- Re: patch/proposal: obsolete configurations in 3.1
  - From: Zack Weinberg

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]