This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: GCC 3.1 Release
- From: Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr at codesourcery dot com>
- To: Joe Buck <Joe dot Buck at synopsys dot com>
- Cc: gdr at codesourcery dot com (Gabriel Dos Reis), pcarlini at unitus dot it (Paolo Carlini), gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 11 Apr 2002 23:52:50 +0200
- Subject: Re: GCC 3.1 Release
- Organization: CodeSourcery, LLC
- References: <200204111138.EAA06265@atrus.synopsys.com>
Joe Buck <Joe.Buck@synopsys.com> writes:
| Gaby writes:
|
| > Yes, I meant moving the __normal_iterator<> definition into
| > __gnu_cxx:: with accompanying helper functions. And also, Joe patch
| > should be put in that namespace also (since that is where Koenig
| > lookup should find them).
|
| OK, so you're proposing the move to a different namespace in addition
| to my patch, rather than instead of. That's doable, but is there
| really a strong reason to do the move? What's the harm in having
| additional __ names in std?
No, you aren't having a __ name in std::. You're defining another
user visible visible (operator==) in std::.
-- Gaby