This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: DFA scheduler merge - approval issues?

From: "David S. Miller" <davem at redhat dot com>
To: vmakarov at redhat dot com
Cc: geoffk at geoffk dot org, dberlin at dberlin dot org, tm at mail dot kloo dot net, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, vmakarov at cygnus dot com
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2002 19:55:43 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: DFA scheduler merge - approval issues?
References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0204101400270.4068-100000@dberlin.org><jm662zo0t0.fsf@desire.geoffk.org><3CB48AB6.C3A6F3A5@redhat.com>

   From: Vladimir Makarov <vmakarov@redhat.com>
   Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2002 14:55:50 -0400

   > Other than these things, I believe nothing stands in the way of doing
   > the merge.

   Thanks, Geoff.  I'll do it.  I think that I could finish it in week.

I will help with regression testing on Sparc.

As per the SPEC result stuff, there was a posting showing the
SPEC improvements DFA alone gave on UltraSPARC, but I cannot
remember if it was posted to these lists or not.

References:
- Re: DFA scheduler merge - approval issues?
  - From: Daniel Berlin
- Re: DFA scheduler merge - approval issues?
  - From: Geoff Keating
- Re: DFA scheduler merge - approval issues?
  - From: Vladimir Makarov

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]