This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: GCC 3.1 Release
- From: Janis Johnson <janis187 at us dot ibm dot com>
- To: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>
- Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2002 10:14:39 -0700
- Subject: Re: GCC 3.1 Release
- References: <48730000.1017786180@gandalf.codesourcery.com>
On Tue, Apr 02, 2002 at 02:23:00PM -0800, Mark Mitchell wrote:
> Now that Richard has made GNATS immune to random new bugs being classified
> as "high" priority, it makes sense to go back to using high-priority bugs
> in GNATS -- rather than an external issuse list -- as our way to measure
> what needs to be done before the release.
>
> To that end, I've made sure that everything on the issues list is marked
> "high" in GNATS, and checked in a new copy of the issues list that
> indicates it is no longer in use.
What's the right way to ask for bugs to be high priority?
PR optimization/6177 (ia64 ICE with single-element complex array in
LAPACK) describes a bug introduced on April 2. It affects i686 also.
An update to the PR includes a six line Fortran test case.
Janis