Re: c++ vs decl_external

[Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>]

On Wed, Apr 03, 2002 at 01:19:02PM -0800, Mark Mitchell wrote:
> IIRC, they get unmarked later.  This is the 
> slightly-odd-but-always-been-with-us DECL_NOT_REALLY_EXTERN bit.

In a case I'm looking at, it doesn't.

I'll check in a patch and (failing) test case to mainline here
in a minute and someone familiar with that slightly-oddness can
look at it.  The problem is not urgent -- we simply fail to
emit an unused function warning when we ought.


r~