gcc archive
date index for April, 2002

This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

April 30, 2002
23:26 Re: 2002-04-28's 3.1 branch's libjava won't build onGNU/Linux/sparc David S. Miller
22:35 Re: 2002-04-28's 3.1 branch's libjava won't build on GNU/Linux/sparc Alexandre Oliva
22:31 Re: 2002-04-28's 3.1 branch's libjava won't build on GNU/Linux/sparc Alexandre Oliva
21:44 Re: 2002-04-28's 3.1 branch's libjava won't build onGNU/Linux/sparc David S. Miller
21:38 Re: 2002-04-28's 3.1 branch's libjava won't build on GNU/Linux/sparc Alexandre Oliva
21:06 Re: 2002-04-28's 3.1 branch's libjava won't build onGNU/Linux/sparc David S. Miller
20:43 Re: PR 6394 John David Anglin
20:29 Re: PR 6394 law
20:28 Re: Bootstrap error with gcc-20020429 snapshot on Sun / Solaris8 Alexandre Oliva
20:22 irix 6.5 regressions in 3.1 Billinghurst, David (CRTS)
20:18 Member class access to private members of enclosing class Dylan Cuthbert
19:55 Re: PR 6394 John David Anglin
19:52 Re: PR 6394 John David Anglin
19:00 Re: Bootstrap error with gcc-20020429 snapshot on mips-sgi-irix6.5 Alexandre Oliva
18:55 Re: seperating the gcc/ directory David O'Brien
18:48 Re: ldq and stq on UltraSparc I and II David S. Miller
18:48 Re: PR 6394 law
18:46 Re: PR 6394 law
18:45 Re: PR 6394 law
18:41 Re: 2002-04-28's 3.1 branch's libjava won't build onGNU/Linux/sparc David S. Miller
18:40 Re: ldq and stq on UltraSparc I and II David O'Brien
18:35 2002-04-28's 3.1 branch's libjava won't build on GNU/Linux/sparc Alexandre Oliva
18:28 2002-04-29's snapshot's libstdc++ won't build on IRIX6 nor Tru64 Alexandre Oliva
17:46 libstdc++/6513: severe regression from 3.0.x Paolo Carlini
17:44 Re: gcc 3.1 Ada failure on GNU/Linux Joel Sherrill
17:19 Re: sizeof (_Bool) Aldy Hernandez
17:04 RE: Bootstrap error with gcc-20020429 snapshot on mips-sgi-irix6.5 Billinghurst, David (CRTS)
16:41 Re: PR 6394 law
16:40 Re: PR 6394 law
16:34 RE: What about boehm-gc under cygwin? Billinghurst, David (CRTS)
16:27 Re: PR 6394 Geoff Keating
16:24 Re: PR 6394 John David Anglin
16:11 Re: gcc 3.1 won't built along with binutils 2.12 on sparc-*-* David S. Miller
16:10 Re: PR 6394 law
16:04 Re: ldq and stq on UltraSparc I and II David S. Miller
15:52 Re: ldq and stq on UltraSparc I and II Andrey Petrov
15:29 Re: PR 6394 law
15:23 Re: PR 6394 John David Anglin
15:12 Re: PR 6394 law
15:04 Re: gcc 3.1 Ada failure on GNU/Linux Robert Dewar
15:04 Re: PR 6394 John David Anglin
14:57 Re: seperating the gcc/ directory Phil Edwards
14:54 Re: ldq and stq on UltraSparc I and II Jakub Jelinek
14:52 Re: PR 6394 law
14:48 Re: LittleEndian Toon Moene
14:45 Re: ldq and stq on UltraSparc I and II David S. Miller
14:39 Re: seperating the gcc/ directory David S. Miller
14:28 Re: PR 6394 John David Anglin
14:22 Re: PR 6394 John David Anglin
14:20 Re: What about boehm-gc under cygwin? Tom Tromey
14:15 Re: ldq and stq on UltraSparc I and II Richard Henderson
14:12 ldq and stq on UltraSparc I and II David O'Brien
14:07 Re: LittleEndian Allan Sandfeld Jensen
14:04 Re: PR 6394 law
14:03 Re: PR 6394 law
13:59 Re: LittleEndian Toon Moene
13:52 Re: PR 6394 John David Anglin
13:48 RE: What about boehm-gc under cygwin? Christian Jönsson
13:41 Re: Questions about ``[PATCH] GCC side of .eh_frame_hdr support (take 3)'' David O'Brien
13:41 Re: Questions about ``[PATCH] GCC side of .eh_frame_hdr support (take 3)'' David O'Brien
13:38 Re: PR 6394 David Edelsohn
13:37 Re: Questions about ``[PATCH] GCC side of .eh_frame_hdr support (take 3)'' David O'Brien
13:22 Re: PR 6394 Geoff Keating
13:13 Re: Reload byte using word access Richard Henderson
13:12 g++ locks up on templated code Jeff Lee
13:07 Re: PR 6394 John David Anglin
13:07 Re: Passing options through gcc to linker Richard Henderson
12:56 Re: PR 6394 David Edelsohn
12:52 Re: PR 6394 Geoff Keating
12:46 Re: seperating the gcc/ directory David O'Brien
12:44 Re: New G++ testsuite errors for AIX 3.2 20020429 (experimental) Mark Mitchell
12:35 Re: New G++ testsuite errors for AIX 3.2 20020429 (experimental) Franz Sirl
12:30 Re: cross target report on gcc 3.1-20020423 Eric Christopher
12:11 Re: SH5 compact register numbering in gcc -> gdb interface Joern Rennecke
11:52 Re: gcc 3.1 Ada failure on GNU/Linux Joel Sherrill
11:31 Re: gcc 3.1 Ada failure on GNU/Linux Florian Weimer
11:26 Re: [3.1] Ada bug reporting points to README.GNATPRO Geert Bosch
11:20 Re: Bootstrap error with gcc-20020429 snapshot on mips-sgi-irix6.5 Franz Sirl
11:15 Re: New G++ testsuite errors for AIX 3.2 20020429 (experimental) Mark Mitchell
11:04 Re: Ada bugs Florian Weimer
11:03 Re: [3.1] Ada bug reporting points to README.GNATPRO Florian Weimer
10:54 Re: What about boehm-gc under cygwin? Tom Tromey
10:53 gcc 3.1 Ada failure on GNU/Linux Joel Sherrill
10:48 SH5 compact register numbering in gcc -> gdb interface Joern Rennecke
10:46 Re: PR 6394 John David Anglin
10:31 3.1 branch Ada cross report Joel Sherrill
10:29 Re: PR 6394 David Edelsohn
10:27 Re: sizeof (_Bool) Dale Johannesen
10:03 Re: Parallel cross-compiler installs [Was: want a,m,s,w,x when building gcc-3.1] Richard Henderson
09:45 Re: 3.1 regrename.c doesn't handle which_alternative==-1 Jakub Jelinek
09:40 Re: 3.1 regrename.c doesn't handle which_alternative==-1 Michael Matz
09:39 Re: [PATCH] Fix PR c/6343 (was: Re: GCC 3.1 Prerelease) Mark Mitchell
09:24 Re: x86-64 as a subtarget of the i386 configuration Jan Hubicka
09:14 Re: New G++ testsuite errors for AIX 3.2 20020429 (experimental) Janis Johnson
08:59 Reload byte using word access D. Towner
08:26 Re: 3.1 regrename.c doesn't handle which_alternative==-1 Brad Lucier
08:22 New G++ testsuite errors for AIX 3.2 20020429 (experimental) David Edelsohn
07:59 Bootstrap error with gcc-20020429 snapshot on mips-sgi-irix6.5 Reichelt
07:49 Re: inliner in gcc-3.1 Daniel Berlin
06:56 Re: inliner in gcc-3.1 Gerald Pfeifer
06:37 Warning: gcc (3.1 branch) is broken for target i686-pc-mingw32 megacz
06:20 US mirror sites of snapshots? Blair Kelly III
05:26 Re: [PATCH] Fix PR c/6343 (was: Re: GCC 3.1 Prerelease) Jason Merrill
05:24 Re: bprob-1.da file clashes in testsuite Ulrich Weigand
05:20 Build Success: gcc-20020429 Kurt Wall
05:03 Re: LittleEndian Robert Dewar
04:51 Re: LittleEndian Allan Sandfeld Jensen
04:25 Bootstrap error with gcc-20020429 snapshot on Sun / Solaris8 glebourgeois
03:16 Re: [Fwd: Current state of MIPS16 support?] Dominic Sweetman
02:48 Passing options through gcc to linker D. Towner
02:15 Re: 3.1 regrename.c doesn't handle which_alternative==-1 Michael Matz
01:40 Re: ld segfaults in gcc-3.1's configuration Ralf Corsepius
01:25 Ada.Characters.{Wide_}Latin_9 should be deleted David Starner
01:08 Re: ld segfaults in gcc-3.1's configuration Jakub Jelinek
00:37 RE: What about boehm-gc under cygwin? Christian Jönsson
00:18 ld segfaults in gcc-3.1's configuration Ralf Corsepius

April 29, 2002
23:25 gcc 3.1 won't built along with binutils 2.12 on sparc-*-* Alexandre Oliva
23:16 Parallel cross-compiler installs [Was: want a,m,s,w,x whenbuilding gcc-3.1] Ralf Corsepius
22:42 Re: Problem with forward declaration within a namespace... Alexandre Oliva
22:24 Re: sizeof (_Bool) Aldy Hernandez
21:42 Re: Do you want to hear about xfree86 & -frename-registers Richard Henderson
21:38 Re: 3.1 regrename.c doesn't handle which_alternative==-1 Richard Henderson
21:34 Re: PR 6394 John David Anglin
21:33 RE: cross target report on gcc 3.1-20020423 Rekha Deshmukh
20:46 Re: fr30 FP format question Zack Weinberg
19:33 Re: fr30 FP format question Joel Sherrill
19:29 Re: fr30 FP format question Joel Sherrill
19:24 Re: fr30 FP format question Hans-Peter Nilsson
19:21 Re: cross target report on gcc 3.1-20020423 Joel Sherrill
19:19 Re: fr30 FP format question David Edelsohn
19:18 Re: cross target report on gcc 3.1-20020423 Joel Sherrill
19:14 Re: fr30 FP format question Joel Sherrill
19:10 Re: cross target report on gcc 3.1-20020423 Joel Sherrill
19:04 Do you want to hear about xfree86 & -frename-registers George Garvey
18:41 gcc-ss-20020429 is now available gccadmin
18:37 Re: bprob-1.da file clashes in testsuite Mark Mitchell
17:56 3.1 regrename.c doesn't handle which_alternative==-1 Brad Lucier
17:48 RE: FTensor on cygwin - partial success Billinghurst, David (CRTS)
17:25 Re: want a,m,s,w,x when building gcc-3.1 Richard Henderson
17:16 Re: pure and const functions John Wehle
16:17 Re: bprob-1.da file clashes in testsuite Janis Johnson
16:08 Re: fr30 FP format question Richard Henderson
14:52 Re: LittleEndian Robert Dewar
14:43 Re: LittleEndian Allan Sandfeld Jensen
14:36 Re: What about boehm-gc under cygwin? Tom Tromey
13:58 PR 6394 Mark Mitchell
13:20 RE: What about boehm-gc under cygwin? Christian Jönsson
13:14 RE: What about boehm-gc under cygwin? kelley.r.cook
13:10 Re: x86-64 as a subtarget of the i386 configuration Andi Kleen
12:35 Re: cross target report on gcc 3.1-20020423 Hans-Peter Nilsson
12:27 Re: cross target report on gcc 3.1-20020423 Hans-Peter Nilsson
12:24 Re: FTensor on cygwin - partial success Walter Landry
12:20 Re: fr30 FP format question Hans-Peter Nilsson
12:17 x86-64 as a subtarget of the i386 configuration Toon Moene
11:36 Re: seperating the gcc/ directory Phil Edwards
10:58 Re: [PATCH] Fix PR c/6343 (was: Re: GCC 3.1 Prerelease) Franz Sirl
10:36 bprob-1.da file clashes in testsuite Ulrich Weigand
10:22 Re: fr30 FP format question Zack Weinberg
10:09 Re: fr30 FP format question Joseph S. Myers
10:01 Re: Successful compile and install Janis Johnson
09:59 Re: Compile Results Janis Johnson
09:59 Re: Successful build of gcc 3.0.4 Janis Johnson
09:58 Re: Successful Build of GCC 3.0.4 Janis Johnson
09:52 Re: pure and const functions Mark Dettinger
09:34 Re: pure and const functions Chris Lattner
09:29 Re: pure and const functions Chris Lattner
09:23 Re: pure and const functions Robert Dewar
09:22 Re: pure and const functions Daniel Berlin
09:22 Re: FTensor on cygwin - partial success Janis Johnson
09:21 Re: cross target report on gcc 3.1-20020423 Stan Shebs
09:00 Re: cross target report on gcc 3.1-20020423 Jim Wilson
08:57 Re: success gcc-3.1-20020423 on macosx Janis Johnson
08:40 Re: pure and const functions Chris Lattner
08:30 Re: success gcc-3.1-20020423 on macosx Stan Shebs
08:30 Re: pure and const functions Robert Dewar
08:22 Re: pure and const functions Chris Lattner
08:05 Re: LittleEndian Tim Prince
07:39 RE: What about boehm-gc under cygwin? Robert Dewar
07:35 RE: What about boehm-gc under cygwin? Christian Jönsson
07:21 Re: cross target report on gcc 3.1-20020423 Joel Sherrill
07:18 Re: fr30 FP format question Joel Sherrill
07:09 FTensor on cygwin - partial success Billinghurst, David (CRTS)
07:07 Successful compile and install Paul Crittenden
07:02 Re: does g++ perform return-value-optimization? Gabriel Dos Reis
06:59 pooma on cygwin OK Billinghurst, David (CRTS)
06:50 RE: What about boehm-gc under cygwin? Billinghurst, David (CRTS)
06:48 Re: Propose PR 6160 as high priority Joseph S. Myers
06:44 Re: fr30 FP format question Toon Moene
06:00 Re: does g++ perform return-value-optimization? Paolo Carlini
05:44 does g++ perform return-value-optimization? Jeff Lee
05:39 Re: pure and const functions Mark Dettinger
05:18 Re: Propose PR 6160 as high priority Florian Weimer
03:59 Re: pure and const functions Robert Dewar
03:04 Re: pure and const functions Mark Dettinger
02:00 Re: The D Programming Language David Rasmussen
01:15 What about boehm-gc under cygwin? Christian Jönsson

April 28, 2002
23:32 About VLIW processor target =?gb2312?B?vaogzrC7qg==?=
23:07 LittleEndian Miri
22:40 Re: ok to use autogen to generate Makefile.in?... alternatives? Alexandre Oliva
22:27 RE: cross target report on gcc 3.1-20020423 Rekha Deshmukh
22:22 Re: Propose PR 6160 as high priority Alexandre Oliva
21:25 Re: 3.1 bootstrap failure on sparc-sun-solaris2.8 David S. Miller
20:23 PPC multilibs [Re: success gcc-3.1-20020423 on macosx] Bryce McKinlay
19:13 success gcc-3.1-20020423 on macosx Konstantin Olchanski
18:59 Re: 3.1 bootstrap failure on sparc-sun-solaris2.8 Hans-Peter Nilsson
17:59 Re: The D Programming Language Robert Lipe
17:44 3.1 bootstrap failure on sparc-sun-solaris2.8 Brad Lucier
16:36 seperating the gcc/ directory Dan D Carpenter
15:00 Re: [PATCH] Fix PR c/6343 (was: Re: GCC 3.1 Prerelease) Mark Mitchell
14:58 Re: [PATCH] Fix PR c/6343 (was: Re: GCC 3.1 Prerelease) Jason Merrill
13:19 Re: The D Programming Language David Rasmussen
12:49 Re: The D Programming Language David Rasmussen
12:49 Re: The D Programming Language Robert Dewar
11:59 [ast-optimizer-branch] Mainline merge as of 2002-04-27 Diego Novillo
10:59 Re: [PATCH] Fix PR c/6343 (was: Re: GCC 3.1 Prerelease) Mark Mitchell
10:25 Re: The D Programming Language Tim Hollebeek
10:17 [DFA] better scheduler debug dumps Jan Hubicka
08:44 Re: The D Programming Language David Rasmussen
07:39 Re: [PATCH] Fix PR c/6343 (was: Re: GCC 3.1 Prerelease) Franz Sirl
01:32 The D Programming Language Walter
00:54 c++/6492: new 3.1 regression for Boost Paolo Carlini

April 27, 2002
23:23 Re: want a,m,s,w,x when building gcc-3.1 Ralf Corsepius
23:21 post 3.1 release David S. Miller
23:17 optimize in GCC and ADS James Chen
21:19 Compile Results Kathy Gerber
15:49 Successful build of gcc 3.0.4 Rob Sykes
12:44 fr30 FP format question Joel Sherrill
11:58 Re: Number of 1's in 64 bit number...[don't read if not interestedin algos/math...] David Rasmussen
11:45 Re: libltdl Tom Tromey
11:20 Re: Testing 3.1 g++ applications on cygwin Gerald Pfeifer
11:03 libltdl Mark Mitchell
09:57 Re: New regression in gcc-3.1 (?) Paolo Carlini
09:49 New regression in gcc-3.1 (?) Michael Veksler
09:15 Re: inliner in gcc-3.1 Kurt Garloff
07:41 hppa1.1 embedded update Joel Sherrill
07:39 Re: cross target report on gcc 3.1-20020423 Joel Sherrill

April 26, 2002
19:08 Re: How do I prevent gcc from linking with GNU standard C library Daniel Jacobowitz
18:54 Re: How do I prevent gcc from linking with GNU standard C library Roger Sayle
18:06 can *you* build gcc-3.0.4 for m68k-elf on HP/UX 10.20 Peter Barada
17:53 Re: cross target report on gcc 3.1-20020423 Jim Wilson
17:02 Re: sizeof (_Bool) Joseph S. Myers
16:49 How do I prevent gcc from linking with GNU standard C library Tanveer Ahmad
16:40 Re: sizeof (_Bool) Stan Shebs
16:30 Re: [3.1] Ada bug reporting points to README.GNATPRO Robert Dewar
16:29 Re: sizeof (_Bool) mike stump
16:14 Re: sizeof (_Bool) Joseph S. Myers
16:12 Re: PA specifies invalid T_ADAFLAGS Robert Dewar
16:09 Re: Gnats and spam Robert Dewar
15:53 Re: Testing 3.1 g++ applications on cygwin Paolo Carlini
15:52 Re: Questions about ``[PATCH] GCC side of .eh_frame_hdr support (take 3)'' Jakub Jelinek
15:49 sizeof (_Bool) Stan Shebs
15:48 Re: Questions about ``[PATCH] GCC side of .eh_frame_hdr support (take 3)'' Loren James Rittle
15:41 Re: Testing 3.1 g++ applications on cygwin Janis Johnson
15:25 Re: PATCH for Re: 6350: How to upgrade priority to high? Mark Mitchell
15:24 Re: [3.1] Ada bug reporting points to README.GNATPRO Florian Weimer
15:04 PATCH for Re: 6350: How to upgrade priority to high? Gerald Pfeifer
14:40 Re: bootstrap problem on sparc-sun-solaris2.7: libtool configure failed Phil Edwards
14:33 Successful Build of GCC 3.0.4 Jeff Stephens
14:16 Re: Testing 3.1 g++ applications on cygwin Gerald Pfeifer
14:06 Re: Testing 3.1 g++ applications on cygwin Janis Johnson
13:40 Re: Current GCC status (was: PATCH: Fix in-source configurationregressionfrom gcc 3.0.4) Gerald Pfeifer
13:04 c++/6479: serious regression! Paolo Carlini
12:59 Re: Current GCC status (was: PATCH: Fix in-source configuration regressionfrom gcc 3.0.4) Jonathan Lennox
12:49 Re: pure and const functions Jakub Jelinek
12:33 Re: pure and const functions Russ Allbery
12:11 Re: Gnats and spam Tom Tromey
12:00 RE: pure and const functions Mark Mitchell
11:50 Re: h8300-coff vs h8300-rtems law
11:46 Re: bison 1.33 problem with mainline c-parse.in: yyfree_stacks Michael Elizabeth Chastain
11:28 Re: FIX was [Fwd: gcc 3.1 hppa failures] law
11:27 Re: PA specifies invalid T_ADAFLAGS John David Anglin
11:20 Re: pure and const functions Magnus Fromreide
11:03 Re: pure and const functions Joseph S. Myers
11:01 Re: pure and const functions Chris Lattner
10:59 Re: pure and const functions Chris Lattner
10:56 Re: pure and const functions Magnus Fromreide
10:56 Re: PA specifies invalid T_ADAFLAGS law
10:56 Re: pure and const functions Zack Weinberg
10:54 Re: pure and const functions Tony Finch
10:51 Re: PA specifies invalid T_ADAFLAGS law
10:48 Re: PA specifies invalid T_ADAFLAGS law
10:47 Re: Current GCC status (was: PATCH: Fix in-source configurationregression from gcc 3.0.4) Mark Mitchell
10:46 [3.1] Ada bug reporting points to README.GNATPRO Matthias Klose
10:43 Re: pure and const functions Chris Lattner
10:43 Re: PA specifies invalid T_ADAFLAGS law
10:37 Re: bison 1.33 problem with mainline c-parse.in: yyfree_stacks John David Anglin
10:36 Re: Testing 3.1 g++ applications on cygwin Peter Schmid
10:35 Re: pure and const functions Kris Warkentin
10:34 Re: pure and const functions Chris Lattner
10:31 Re: pure and const functions Magnus Fromreide
10:31 Re: bison 1.33 problem with mainline c-parse.in: yyfree_stacks John David Anglin
10:30 Re: Gnats and spam Joseph S. Myers
10:30 Re: pure and const functions Chris Lattner
10:26 Re: pure and const functions Chris Lattner
10:22 Re: pure and const functions Tim Hollebeek
10:21 Re: bison 1.33 problem with mainline c-parse.in: yyfree_stacks Joseph S. Myers
10:21 Re: pure and const functions Kris Warkentin
10:17 Re: PATCH for Re: http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-3.1/changes.html - linux/x86 debug formats? Richard Henderson
09:53 RE: pure and const functions Chris Lattner
09:47 Re: bison 1.33 problem with mainline c-parse.in: yyfree_stacks John David Anglin
09:39 Re: Testing 3.1 g++ applications on cygwin Janis Johnson
09:35 Re: PA specifies invalid T_ADAFLAGS John David Anglin
09:30 Re: PA specifies invalid T_ADAFLAGS law
09:18 Re: Testing 3.1 g++ applications on cygwin Janis Johnson
09:07 Re: patch/proposal: obsolete configurations in 3.1 Janis Johnson
08:59 Re: Gnats and spam Tom Tromey
08:56 bison 1.33 problem with mainline c-parse.in: yyfree_stacks Michael Elizabeth Chastain
08:51 Re: Current GCC status (was: PATCH: Fix in-source configuration regression from gcc 3.0.4) Alexandre Oliva
08:46 PATCH for Re: http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-3.1/changes.html - linux/x86debug formats? Gerald Pfeifer
08:37 RE: patch/proposal: obsolete configurations in 3.1 Dana, Eric
08:36 installation Vu Khuong
08:27 Re: Testing 3.1 g++ applications on cygwin Gerald Pfeifer
08:20 3.1 Snapshot gcc-3.1-20020423 Test Failures Kurt Wall
08:20 Re: inliner in gcc-3.1 Kurt Garloff
08:20 Re: Testing 3.1 g++ applications on cygwin Janis Johnson
08:11 Re: can you help me? Mark Dettinger
07:36 Re: PA specifies invalid T_ADAFLAGS Matthew Wilcox
07:28 gnat with gcc 3.1 build failure Joel Sherrill
07:01 Re: cross target report on gcc 3.1-20020423 Joel Sherrill
06:36 Re: cross target report on gcc 3.1-20020423 Jakub Jelinek
06:34 Re: FIX was [Fwd: gcc 3.1 hppa failures] David S. Miller
06:33 Re: cross target report on gcc 3.1-20020423 David S. Miller
06:29 FIX was [Fwd: gcc 3.1 hppa failures] Joel Sherrill
06:21 Re: cross target report on gcc 3.1-20020423 Joel Sherrill
05:38 RE: bootstrap problem on sparc-sun-solaris2.7: libtool configure failed Rupert Wood
05:16 Re: bootstrap problem on sparc-sun-solaris2.7: libtool configure failed Christian Jönsson
05:08 pure and const functions Mark Dettinger
04:23 Re: cross target report on gcc 3.1-20020423 David S. Miller
04:20 Re: [OT] Re: Number of 1's in 64 bit number...[don't read if not intereste d in algos/math...] Gabriel Paubert
04:20 Current GCC status (was: PATCH: Fix in-source configuration regressionfrom gcc 3.0.4) Gerald Pfeifer
04:19 Re: cross target report on gcc 3.1-20020423 Joel Sherrill
04:10 Re: inliner in gcc-3.1 Gerald Pfeifer
04:06 Re: gcc 3.1 hppa failures Joel Sherrill
02:41 Re: PA specifies invalid T_ADAFLAGS Richard Kenner
02:17 [OT] Re: Number of 1's in 64 bit number...[don't read if not intereste d in algos/math...] Bernd Jendrissek
02:14 Re: Declarations in anonymous namespaces Michael Matz
01:55 Re: bootstrap problem on sparc-sun-solaris2.7: libtool configure failed Robert Schiele
01:48 can you help me? lplain
00:30 Re: Questions about ``[PATCH] GCC side of .eh_frame_hdr support (take 3)'' Jakub Jelinek
00:17 Release Schedule Jim Blomo
00:00 Re: Questions about ``[PATCH] GCC side of .eh_frame_hdr support (take 3)'' Richard Henderson

April 25, 2002
23:44 Re: Questions about ``[PATCH] GCC side of .eh_frame_hdr support (take 3)'' Loren James Rittle
23:26 Gnats and spam Neil Booth
23:18 Testing 3.1 g++ applications on cygwin Billinghurst, David (CRTS)
22:55 Re: ICE bootstrapping gcc 2002-04-25 trunk on sparc32-linux: crtstuff.c Christian Jönsson
22:51 Re: PA specifies invalid T_ADAFLAGS Matthew Wilcox
21:53 Declarations in anonymous namespaces aaronwl
21:14 Re: PA specifies invalid T_ADAFLAGS John David Anglin
20:52 Re: PA specifies invalid T_ADAFLAGS Robert Dewar
20:51 Re: PA specifies invalid T_ADAFLAGS Robert Dewar
19:58 Re: PA specifies invalid T_ADAFLAGS John David Anglin
19:55 Re: PA specifies invalid T_ADAFLAGS Robert Dewar
19:45 Re: PA specifies invalid T_ADAFLAGS John David Anglin
19:37 Re: PA specifies invalid T_ADAFLAGS Robert Dewar
19:12 Re: PA specifies invalid T_ADAFLAGS Robert Dewar
19:06 Re: cross target report on gcc 3.1-20020423 David S. Miller
18:58 Re: C++ 3.04 compiler mike stump
18:25 Re: ICE bootstrapping gcc 2002-04-25 trunk on sparc32-linux:crtstuff.c David S. Miller
17:55 Re: inliner in gcc-3.1 Daniel Berlin
17:44 Re: Number of 1's in 64 bit number...[don't read if not interestedin algos/math...] Daniel Berlin
17:29 Re: C++ aliasing rules mike stump
16:56 Re: gcc 3.1 hppa failures Joe Buck
16:51 Re: patch/proposal: obsolete configurations in 3.1 Jason Merrill
16:44 Re: C++ 3.04 compiler Joe Buck
16:44 Re: ICE bootstrapping gcc 2002-04-25 trunk on sparc32-linux: crtstuff.c Hans-Peter Nilsson
15:51 C++ 3.04 compiler Teresa Cottom
15:47 Re: inliner in gcc-3.1 Kurt Garloff
15:39 Re: Number of 1's in 64 bit number...[don't read if not interestedin algos/math...] Wei Qin
15:30 Re: config.sub Mark Mitchell
15:23 Re: inliner in gcc-3.1 Kurt Garloff
15:15 Re: config.sub Hans-Peter Nilsson
15:13 Re: Number of 1's in 64 bit number...[don't read if not interested in algos/math...] Richard Henderson
15:06 config.sub Mark Mitchell
15:04 Re: inliner in gcc-3.1 Kurt Garloff
13:14 Re: PA specifies invalid T_ADAFLAGS John David Anglin
12:59 Re: ICE bootstrapping gcc 2002-04-25 trunk on sparc32-linux: crtstuff.c Christian Jönsson
12:57 Re: [PATCH] Fix PR c/6343 (was: Re: GCC 3.1 Prerelease) Jason Merrill
12:23 [PATCH] Fix PR c/6343 (was: Re: GCC 3.1 Prerelease) Franz Sirl
12:15 [OT] Number of 1's in 64 bit number Claus Fischer
12:13 Re: Number of 1's in 64 bit number...[don't read if not interestedin algos/math...] Wei Qin
11:24 ICE bootstrapping gcc 2002-04-25 trunk on sparc32-linux: crtstuff.c Christian Jönsson
11:13 Re: Number of 1's in 64 bit number...[don't read if not interested in algos/math...] Gabriel Paubert
11:04 bootstrap problem on sparc-sun-solaris2.7: libtool configure failed Joe Buck
10:59 Re: Mined out of comp.std.c... Peter Barada
10:57 Re: gcc 2.95.x interesting c++ parser error (bug). Phil Edwards
10:45 Re: C++ aliasing rules Jason Merrill
10:36 Re: GCC 3.0.4 built on RS/6000 with AIX 5.1 Janis Johnson
10:33 Re: Number of 1's in 64 bit number...[don't read if not interested in algos/math...] Nathan Sidwell
10:16 Re: Exception handling problem on x86-64 Richard Henderson
10:13 Re: ALL toolchain builds FAIL on alpha but not on intel Richard Henderson
10:08 Re: Number of 1's in 64 bit number...[don't read if not interestedin algos/math...] Wei Qin
10:07 Re: Exception handling problem on x86-64 David Edelsohn
09:57 GCC 3.0.4 built on RS/6000 with AIX 5.1 Labao Lan
09:51 Re: -fprofile-arcs overwriting return value of fn. Michael Matz
09:46 h8300-coff vs h8300-rtems Joel Sherrill
09:41 Re: Number of 1's in 64 bit number...[don't read if not interested in algos/math...] kelley.r.cook
09:36 Re: inliner in gcc-3.1 Gerald Pfeifer
09:25 -fprofile-arcs overwriting return value of fn. Johannes Thoma
09:19 Re: PA specifies invalid T_ADAFLAGS John David Anglin
09:17 Re: Overzealous implicit typename warning Nathan Sidwell
08:57 Re: Overzealous implicit typename warning Paolo Carlini
08:45 Overzealous implicit typename warning Wimmer Andreas (IMPRO)
07:35 Re: gcc 2.95.x interesting c++ parser error (bug). Karel Gardas
06:57 cross target report on gcc 3.1-20020423 Joel Sherrill
06:36 gcc 3.1 hppa failures Joel Sherrill
06:30 ALL toolchain builds FAIL on alpha but not on intel Matthew Bemis
05:35 Successful build of GCC and G77 3.0.x on MacOSX Kelly, Michael
03:37 Re: PA specifies invalid T_ADAFLAGS Richard Kenner
03:31 Re: PA specifies invalid T_ADAFLAGS Richard Kenner
03:16 Re: gcc 2.95.x interesting c++ parser error (bug). Jason Merrill
03:13 RE: Mined out of comp.std.c... Rupert Wood
02:58 Re: namespaces Paolo Carlini
02:56 Re: PA specifies invalid T_ADAFLAGS Michael Matz
02:56 Re: namespaces Gerald Pfeifer
02:55 RE: Mined out of comp.std.c... Rupert Wood
02:54 Exception handling problem on x86-64 Bo Thorsen
02:47 namespaces eziolkow
02:12 Re: PA specifies invalid T_ADAFLAGS Olivier Hainque
02:06 RE: Mined out of comp.std.c... Rupert Wood
01:59 Re: Mined out of comp.std.c... Tim Hollebeek
01:53 RE: Mined out of comp.std.c... Rupert Wood
01:46 Re: Mined out of comp.std.c... Nathan Sidwell
01:39 RE: Mined out of comp.std.c... Rupert Wood
01:12 Re: http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-3.1/changes.html - linux/x86 debug formats? Richard Henderson
01:11 Re: Mined out of comp.std.c... Richard Henderson
00:49 Re: C++ aliasing rules Nathan Sidwell
00:48 Re: PA specifies invalid T_ADAFLAGS Richard Henderson
00:41 Re: inliner in gcc-3.1 Richard Henderson
00:39 Re: Mined out of comp.std.c... Alan Modra
00:38 Re: Number of 1's in 64 bit number...[don't read if not interestedin algos/math...] Gerald Pfeifer
00:21 Re: http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-3.1/changes.html - linux/x86 debug formats? Alex Hornby
00:18 Re: inliner in gcc-3.1 Gerald Pfeifer
00:08 Re: PA specifies invalid T_ADAFLAGS Arnaud Charlet

April 24, 2002
23:51 Mined out of comp.std.c... Zack Weinberg
23:08 Re: Number of 1's in 64 bit number...[don't read if not interested in algos/math...] Jaswant
22:47 Re: Number of 1's in 64 bit number...[don't read if not interestedin algos/math...] Vivek Srivastava
22:35 Re: PA specifies invalid T_ADAFLAGS John David Anglin
22:08 Re: Number of 1's in 64 bit number...[don't read if not interested in algos/math...] Alan Modra
22:07 Re: PA specifies invalid T_ADAFLAGS Robert Dewar
21:55 Re: PA specifies invalid T_ADAFLAGS John David Anglin
21:44 Number of 1's in 64 bit number...[don't read if not interested in algos/math...] Preeti Aira
21:41 Re: PA specifies invalid T_ADAFLAGS John David Anglin
21:39 PR 6304 Mark Mitchell
21:27 Re: PA specifies invalid T_ADAFLAGS John David Anglin
20:44 Re: PA specifies invalid T_ADAFLAGS Robert Dewar
20:37 Re: PA specifies invalid T_ADAFLAGS Matthew Wilcox
20:26 Re: PA specifies invalid T_ADAFLAGS Robert Dewar
20:09 Re: PA specifies invalid T_ADAFLAGS Matthew Wilcox
20:06 Re: PA specifies invalid T_ADAFLAGS Robert Dewar
19:59 Re: PA specifies invalid T_ADAFLAGS Robert Dewar
19:03 Re: PA specifies invalid T_ADAFLAGS Richard Kenner
16:44 Re: GCC 3.1 prerelease Kurt Wall
16:35 Re: gcc, support, for, nested, low-overhead, looping Michael Hayes
16:31 Re: Cross-testing: check-target-libstdc++-v3 with dejagnu in build tree. Tom Tromey
15:24 Re: inliner in gcc-3.1 Daniel Berlin
14:28 Re: GCC performance regression - up to 20% ? Allan Sandfeld Jensen
13:38 Re: PA specifies invalid T_ADAFLAGS Arnaud Charlet
13:32 Re: PA specifies invalid T_ADAFLAGS John David Anglin
13:27 Re: C++ aliasing rules Dan Nicolaescu
13:14 Re: PA specifies invalid T_ADAFLAGS Arnaud Charlet
13:03 Re: GCC 3.1 Prerelease Jason Merrill
12:43 Re: GCC 3.1 Prerelease Richard Henderson
12:12 Re: PA specifies invalid T_ADAFLAGS Matthew Wilcox
12:07 Re: Blitz++ build and test guide Gerald Pfeifer
12:04 Re: PA specifies invalid T_ADAFLAGS John David Anglin
12:03 Re: GCC 3.1 Prerelease Franz Sirl
11:27 Re: Questions about ``[PATCH] GCC side of .eh_frame_hdr support (take 3)'' Richard Henderson
11:09 Questions about ``[PATCH] GCC side of .eh_frame_hdr support (take 3)'' Loren James Rittle
11:03 Re: sh le fp arg passing Stephen Clarke
10:56 Re: GCC 3.1 prerelease Joseph S. Myers
10:32 Re: GCC 3.1 Prerelease Jason Merrill
10:30 Re: GCC 3.1 Prerelease Mark Mitchell
10:27 Re: GCC 3.1 Prerelease Tom Tromey
10:14 PA specifies invalid T_ADAFLAGS Matthew Wilcox
10:07 Re: GCC 3.1 Prerelease Alexandre Petit-Bianco
09:49 Re: GCC 3.1 Prerelease Mark Mitchell
09:40 Re: GCC 3.1 prerelease Mark Mitchell
09:38 Re: gcc-3.1 ICE on ppc-linux, regression wrt 2.95 David Edelsohn
09:08 Re: Blitz++ build and test guide Janis Johnson
08:45 Re: mips n64 eh failures Mark Mitchell
08:40 Re: gcc-3.1 ICE on ppc-linux, regression wrt 2.95 Michal Moskal
08:35 gcc-3.1 ICE on ppc-linux, regression wrt 2.95 Michal Moskal
07:07 Blitz++ build and test guide Billinghurst, David (CRTS)
06:58 Re: Illegal instruction on sparc32-linux David S. Miller
06:43 Help with initializing static data members of a class template..... Thomas J Amato
06:36 Re: C++ aliasing rules Andreas Schwab
05:51 Re: howto use -fstack-check Manfred Hollstein
05:45 AW: howto use -fstack-check Scholz Maik (CM-CR/EES3) *
05:34 Re: howto use -fstack-check Manfred Hollstein
05:22 AW: howto use -fstack-check Scholz Maik (CM-CR/EES3) *
04:49 Re: howto use -fstack-check Manfred Hollstein
04:37 howto use -fstack-check Scholz Maik (CM-CR/EES3) *
04:23 inliner in gcc-3.1 Kurt Garloff
03:42 Re: C++ aliasing changes on mainline (was: GCC 3.1 Prerelease) Jan Hubicka
03:32 Re: C++ aliasing changes on mainline (was: GCC 3.1 Prerelease) Paolo Carlini
01:00 Re: GCC performance regression - its memset ! Jan Hubicka
00:50 Re: GCC performance regression - its memset ! Jan Hubicka
00:50 C++ aliasing changes on mainline (was: GCC 3.1 Prerelease) Gerald Pfeifer
00:30 Re: GCC performance regression - its memset ! Jakub Jelinek
00:17 Re: GCC performance regression - its memset ! Jan Hubicka

April 23, 2002
19:52 sh le fp arg passing mike stump
19:35 Re: C++ aliasing rules mike stump
19:24 Re: mips n64 eh failures Richard Henderson
19:23 31 build problem on solaris 2.8; ld complaint about elf32/elf64 George.R.Goffe
18:37 Re: GCC 3.1 prerelease Phil Edwards
18:20 Re: GCC 3.1 prerelease Kurt Wall
18:02 Re: mips n64 eh failures Richard Henderson
18:00 Re: http://www.gnu.org/software/gcc/gcc-3.1/criteria.html Wes Groleau
17:12 Re: mips n64 eh failures Richard Henderson
16:59 Re: Attention GCJ devel team Bryce McKinlay
16:53 Re: mips n64 eh failures Richard Henderson
16:30 Re: mips n64 eh failures Mark Mitchell
16:15 mips n64 eh failures Richard Henderson
16:11 Re: GCC 3.1 Release Bryce McKinlay
16:05 Re: GCC 3.1 Prerelease Tom Tromey
15:48 Re: peephole2 question Alan Lehotsky
15:36 Re: peephole2 question Richard Henderson
15:10 Re: peephole2 question Peter Barada
15:08 Re: GCC 3.1 Prerelease Richard Henderson
15:02 Re: GCC 3.1 Prerelease Franz Sirl
14:56 Re: GCC 3.1 Prerelease Per Bothner
14:52 Re: GCC 3.1 Prerelease Tom Tromey
14:21 Re: GCC 3.1 Prerelease Tom Tromey
13:59 Re: GCC 3.1 Prerelease Gerald Pfeifer
13:52 Re: C++ aliasing rules Jason Merrill
13:50 Re: GCC 3.1 Prerelease Richard Henderson
13:38 Re: GCC 3.1 Prerelease Mark Mitchell
13:36 GCC 3.1 prerelease Mark Mitchell
13:35 Re: GCC performance regression - its memset ! Michel LESPINASSE
13:28 Re: GCC 3.1 Prerelease Richard Henderson
13:25 Re: GCC 3.1 Prerelease Mark Mitchell
13:19 Re: GCC 3.1 Prerelease Mark Mitchell
12:22 Re: GCC 3.1 Prerelease Richard Henderson
12:19 Re: GCC 3.1 Prerelease Jason Merrill
11:53 Re: GCC 3.1 Prerelease John David Anglin
11:42 Cross-testing: check-target-libstdc++-v3 with dejagnu in build tree. Hans-Peter Nilsson
11:04 Re: GCC 3.1 Prerelease Richard Henderson
10:46 Re: GCC 3.1 Release David O'Brien
10:40 Re: GCC 3.1 Prerelease Paolo Carlini
10:30 Re: GCC 3.1 Prerelease Franz Sirl
10:18 Re: [AST-optimizer-branch] Double chaining statements (proposal) Sebastian Pop
10:12 Re: the continuing build problems I'm having Janis Johnson
09:49 Re: GCC 3.1 Prerelease Per Bothner
09:45 Re: GCC 3.1 Prerelease Jakub Jelinek
09:36 Re: GCC 3.0.4 build report from Womo 20020423, G++ compiler working with AIX 4.3.3.0 Janis Johnson
09:33 Re: GCC 3.1 Prerelease Joe Buck
09:30 Re: AST-Optimizer and De-Parse James Michael DuPont
09:13 Re: GCC 3.1 Prerelease Mark Mitchell
09:12 Re: GCC 3.1 Prerelease Mark Mitchell
09:08 Re: GCC 3.1 Prerelease Mark Mitchell
08:57 Re: GCC 3.1 Prerelease Per Bothner
08:50 Re: [AST-optimizer-branch] Double chaining statements (proposal) Diego Novillo
08:44 Re: [AST-optimizer-branch] Double chaining statements (proposal) Jan Hubicka
08:24 Re: GCC 3.0.4 build report from Womo 20020423, G++ compiler working with AIX 4.3.3.0 David Edelsohn
08:23 Re: GCC 3.1 Prerelease Gerald Pfeifer
08:22 GCC 3.0.4 build report from Womo 20020423, G++ compiler working withAIX 4.3.3.0 Wolfgang Moser
07:49 Re: Why is the tree often locked by `gccadmin'? David O'Brien
07:39 Re: AST-Optimizer and De-Parse Diego Novillo
07:28 Re: [AST-optimizer-branch] Double chaining statements (proposal) Diego Novillo
07:14 gcc for UWin 3.0 Solomon, David
06:53 Re: crt0.o and stuff Manfred Hollstein
06:33 Re: GCC performance regression - its memset ! Andreas Schwab
06:23 Re: single parse vs multi parse Diego Novillo
05:46 Re: Attention GCJ devel team Oskar Liljeblad
05:43 Re: GCC 3.1 Prerelease Jason Merrill
05:03 Re: Teaching GCC about fmadd variant Daniel Glastonbury
04:54 Re: GCC performance regression - its memset ! Falk Hueffner
04:48 Re: gcc, support, for, nested, low-overhead, looping Michael Hayes
04:32 single parse vs multi parse akey
04:13 Re: GCC 3.1 Prerelease Alan Modra
04:04 Re: GCC 3.1 Prerelease Franz Sirl
03:53 NECESITAMOS PERSONAS EMPRENDEDORAS coupmoney
03:28 Re: GCC 3.1 Prerelease Alan Modra
02:53 Re: GCC performance regression - its memset! Richard Henderson
02:51 Re: GCC performance regression - its memset! Jan Hubicka
02:39 Re: ifcvt related i386 misscompilation (3.1 branch and mainline) Richard Henderson
02:25 Re: GCC performance regression - its memset ! Jan Hubicka
02:12 Re: ifcvt related i386 misscompilation (3.1 branch and mainline) Jan Hubicka
02:04 GCC 3.1 Prerelease Mark Mitchell
00:45 Re: Why is the tree often locked by `gccadmin'? Joseph S. Myers

April 22, 2002
23:30 Re: GCC performance regression - its memset! Michel LESPINASSE
23:07 Re: GCC performance regression - its memset! Michel LESPINASSE
22:25 Re: GCC performance regression - its memset! Roger Sayle
22:00 Re: GCC 3.1 Release Kaveh R. Ghazi
20:13 Re: PROFILE_HOOK label_no Alan Modra
20:11 Re: the continuing build problems I'm having George.R.Goffe
20:00 Re: GCC 3.1 Release Bryce McKinlay
19:44 RE: GCC 3.1 Prerelease Billinghurst, David (CRTS)
19:25 Re: GCC 3.1 Release David O'Brien
19:05 Re: GCC performance regression - up to 20% ? Andrew Pinski
19:01 Re: Why is the tree often locked by `gccadmin'? Andrew Pinski
18:38 Why is the tree often locked by `gccadmin'? David O'Brien
18:37 gcc-ss-20020422 is now available gccadmin
18:30 Is there data on how many use gcc? Art Mellor
18:20 Re: GCC performance regression - up to 20% ? Carlo Wood
17:49 Re: GCC performance regression - up to 20% ? Andrew Pinski
17:42 Re: GCC performance regression - its memset ! Michel LESPINASSE
17:39 Re: GCC performance regression - up to 20% ? Michel LESPINASSE
17:13 Re: GCC performance regression - its memset ! Richard Henderson
17:10 Re: GCC performance regression - its memset ! Michel LESPINASSE
16:59 Re: GCC performance regression - its memset ! Richard Henderson
15:27 Re: GCC performance regression - its memset ! Segher Boessenkool
15:10 Re: GCC performance regression - its memset ! Michel LESPINASSE
15:06 cpplib issues [was re: c/6300] Neil Booth
14:58 Re: ifcvt related i386 misscompilation (3.1 branch and mainline) Richard Henderson
14:41 Re: GCC performance regression - its memset ! Jason R Thorpe
14:35 Re: ifcvt related i386 misscompilation (3.1 branch and mainline) Jan Hubicka
14:33 Re: ifcvt related i386 misscompilation (3.1 branch and mainline) Richard Henderson
14:32 GCC performance regression - its memset ! Michel LESPINASSE
14:24 RTL flag usage Janis Johnson
13:34 ifcvt related i386 misscompilation (3.1 branch and mainline) Jan Hubicka
13:11 Re: Release Mangement Support From HP Toon Moene
12:12 RE: Inefficient register passing structs containing QI values Chris Lattner
11:30 Re: length of variable names mike stump
11:22 Re: Platform...? Java Bytecode!!!! Per Bothner
11:10 Re: Memory conflict between C and C++ programs mike stump
10:56 Re: Platform...? Java Bytecode!!!! Per Bothner
10:52 Re: GCC 3.1 Prerelease Mark Mitchell
10:50 Re: Platform...? Java Bytecode!!!! Florian Weimer
10:46 Re: GCC 3.1 Prerelease Franz Sirl
10:26 Re: Platform...? Java Bytecode!!!! Florian Weimer
10:25 Re: v8.S dwarf2 eh frame issues again :( Jakub Jelinek
10:11 Re: Release Mangement Support From HP Benjamin Kosnik
09:38 Release Mangement Support From HP Mark Mitchell
09:36 Re: Platform...? Java Bytecode!!!! Diego Novillo
09:25 Re: Platform...? Java Bytecode!!!! Luxspes
09:10 Re: Platform...? Java Bytecode!!!! Florian Weimer
09:09 Hot to generate Java Bytecodes? Luxspes
09:07 length of variable names Pieter De Ceuninck
08:55 Inefficient register passing structs containing QI values. D. Towner
08:52 Platform...? Java Bytecode!!!! Luxspes
08:42 Re: 6350: How to upgrade priority to high? (Re: GCC 3.1 Prerelease) Michael Veksler
08:25 Re: Loop unrolling-related Bench++ regressions? Roger Sayle
08:23 Re: 6350: How to upgrade priority to high? (Re: GCC 3.1 Prerelease) Mark Mitchell
08:04 Re: GCC performance regression - up to 20% ? Johannes Stezenbach
07:48 crt0.o and stuff Momchil Velikov
07:38 Re: GCC 3.1 Prerelease Mark Mitchell
07:34 Re: Teaching GCC about fmadd variant Daniel Jacobowitz
07:21 Re: GCC performance regression - up to 20% ? law
07:15 PROFILE_HOOK label_no Alan Modra
07:11 Re: Memory conflict between C and C++ programs Carlo Wood
07:11 Re: GCC performance regression - up to 20% ? Falk Hueffner
06:58 Re: GCC performance regression - up to 20% ? Carlo Wood
06:42 Re: header files Jeff Sturm
05:56 Re: Loop unrolling-related Bench++ regressions? Gerald Pfeifer
04:57