gcc archive
date index for April, 2002

This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

April 30, 2002
23:26 Re: 2002-04-28's 3.1 branch's libjava won't build onGNU/Linux/sparc David S. Miller
22:35 Re: 2002-04-28's 3.1 branch's libjava won't build on GNU/Linux/sparc Alexandre Oliva
22:31 Re: 2002-04-28's 3.1 branch's libjava won't build on GNU/Linux/sparc Alexandre Oliva
21:44 Re: 2002-04-28's 3.1 branch's libjava won't build onGNU/Linux/sparc David S. Miller
21:38 Re: 2002-04-28's 3.1 branch's libjava won't build on GNU/Linux/sparc Alexandre Oliva
21:06 Re: 2002-04-28's 3.1 branch's libjava won't build onGNU/Linux/sparc David S. Miller
20:43 Re: PR 6394 John David Anglin
20:29 Re: PR 6394 law
20:28 Re: Bootstrap error with gcc-20020429 snapshot on Sun / Solaris8 Alexandre Oliva
20:22 irix 6.5 regressions in 3.1 Billinghurst, David (CRTS)
20:18 Member class access to private members of enclosing class Dylan Cuthbert
19:55 Re: PR 6394 John David Anglin
19:52 Re: PR 6394 John David Anglin
19:00 Re: Bootstrap error with gcc-20020429 snapshot on mips-sgi-irix6.5 Alexandre Oliva
18:55 Re: seperating the gcc/ directory David O'Brien
18:48 Re: ldq and stq on UltraSparc I and II David S. Miller
18:48 Re: PR 6394 law
18:46 Re: PR 6394 law
18:45 Re: PR 6394 law
18:41 Re: 2002-04-28's 3.1 branch's libjava won't build onGNU/Linux/sparc David S. Miller
18:40 Re: ldq and stq on UltraSparc I and II David O'Brien
18:35 2002-04-28's 3.1 branch's libjava won't build on GNU/Linux/sparc Alexandre Oliva
18:28 2002-04-29's snapshot's libstdc++ won't build on IRIX6 nor Tru64 Alexandre Oliva
17:46 libstdc++/6513: severe regression from 3.0.x Paolo Carlini
17:44 Re: gcc 3.1 Ada failure on GNU/Linux Joel Sherrill
17:19 Re: sizeof (_Bool) Aldy Hernandez
17:04 RE: Bootstrap error with gcc-20020429 snapshot on mips-sgi-irix6.5 Billinghurst, David (CRTS)
16:41 Re: PR 6394 law
16:40 Re: PR 6394 law
16:34 RE: What about boehm-gc under cygwin? Billinghurst, David (CRTS)
16:27 Re: PR 6394 Geoff Keating
16:24 Re: PR 6394 John David Anglin
16:11 Re: gcc 3.1 won't built along with binutils 2.12 on sparc-*-* David S. Miller
16:10 Re: PR 6394 law
16:04 Re: ldq and stq on UltraSparc I and II David S. Miller
15:52 Re: ldq and stq on UltraSparc I and II Andrey Petrov
15:29 Re: PR 6394 law
15:23 Re: PR 6394 John David Anglin
15:12 Re: PR 6394 law
15:04 Re: gcc 3.1 Ada failure on GNU/Linux Robert Dewar
15:04 Re: PR 6394 John David Anglin
14:57 Re: seperating the gcc/ directory Phil Edwards
14:54 Re: ldq and stq on UltraSparc I and II Jakub Jelinek
14:52 Re: PR 6394 law
14:48 Re: LittleEndian Toon Moene
14:45 Re: ldq and stq on UltraSparc I and II David S. Miller
14:39 Re: seperating the gcc/ directory David S. Miller
14:28 Re: PR 6394 John David Anglin
14:22 Re: PR 6394 John David Anglin
14:20 Re: What about boehm-gc under cygwin? Tom Tromey
14:15 Re: ldq and stq on UltraSparc I and II Richard Henderson
14:12 ldq and stq on UltraSparc I and II David O'Brien
14:07 Re: LittleEndian Allan Sandfeld Jensen
14:04 Re: PR 6394 law
14:03 Re: PR 6394 law
13:59 Re: LittleEndian Toon Moene
13:52 Re: PR 6394 John David Anglin
13:48 RE: What about boehm-gc under cygwin? Christian Jönsson
13:41 Re: Questions about ``[PATCH] GCC side of .eh_frame_hdr support (take 3)'' David O'Brien
13:41 Re: Questions about ``[PATCH] GCC side of .eh_frame_hdr support (take 3)'' David O'Brien
13:38 Re: PR 6394 David Edelsohn
13:37 Re: Questions about ``[PATCH] GCC side of .eh_frame_hdr support (take 3)'' David O'Brien
13:22 Re: PR 6394 Geoff Keating
13:13 Re: Reload byte using word access Richard Henderson
13:12 g++ locks up on templated code Jeff Lee
13:07 Re: PR 6394 John David Anglin
13:07 Re: Passing options through gcc to linker Richard Henderson
12:56 Re: PR 6394 David Edelsohn
12:52 Re: PR 6394 Geoff Keating
12:46 Re: seperating the gcc/ directory David O'Brien
12:44 Re: New G++ testsuite errors for AIX 3.2 20020429 (experimental) Mark Mitchell
12:35 Re: New G++ testsuite errors for AIX 3.2 20020429 (experimental) Franz Sirl
12:30 Re: cross target report on gcc 3.1-20020423 Eric Christopher
12:11 Re: SH5 compact register numbering in gcc -> gdb interface Joern Rennecke
11:52 Re: gcc 3.1 Ada failure on GNU/Linux Joel Sherrill
11:31 Re: gcc 3.1 Ada failure on GNU/Linux Florian Weimer
11:26 Re: [3.1] Ada bug reporting points to README.GNATPRO Geert Bosch
11:20 Re: Bootstrap error with gcc-20020429 snapshot on mips-sgi-irix6.5 Franz Sirl
11:15 Re: New G++ testsuite errors for AIX 3.2 20020429 (experimental) Mark Mitchell
11:04 Re: Ada bugs Florian Weimer
11:03 Re: [3.1] Ada bug reporting points to README.GNATPRO Florian Weimer
10:54 Re: What about boehm-gc under cygwin? Tom Tromey
10:53 gcc 3.1 Ada failure on GNU/Linux Joel Sherrill
10:48 SH5 compact register numbering in gcc -> gdb interface Joern Rennecke
10:46 Re: PR 6394 John David Anglin
10:31 3.1 branch Ada cross report Joel Sherrill
10:29 Re: PR 6394 David Edelsohn
10:27 Re: sizeof (_Bool) Dale Johannesen
10:03 Re: Parallel cross-compiler installs [Was: want a,m,s,w,x when building gcc-3.1] Richard Henderson
09:45 Re: 3.1 regrename.c doesn't handle which_alternative==-1 Jakub Jelinek
09:40 Re: 3.1 regrename.c doesn't handle which_alternative==-1 Michael Matz
09:39 Re: [PATCH] Fix PR c/6343 (was: Re: GCC 3.1 Prerelease) Mark Mitchell
09:24 Re: x86-64 as a subtarget of the i386 configuration Jan Hubicka
09:14 Re: New G++ testsuite errors for AIX 3.2 20020429 (experimental) Janis Johnson
08:59 Reload byte using word access D. Towner
08:26 Re: 3.1 regrename.c doesn't handle which_alternative==-1 Brad Lucier
08:22 New G++ testsuite errors for AIX 3.2 20020429 (experimental) David Edelsohn
07:59 Bootstrap error with gcc-20020429 snapshot on mips-sgi-irix6.5 Reichelt
07:49 Re: inliner in gcc-3.1 Daniel Berlin
06:56 Re: inliner in gcc-3.1 Gerald Pfeifer
06:37 Warning: gcc (3.1 branch) is broken for target i686-pc-mingw32 megacz
06:20 US mirror sites of snapshots? Blair Kelly III
05:26 Re: [PATCH] Fix PR c/6343 (was: Re: GCC 3.1 Prerelease) Jason Merrill
05:24 Re: bprob-1.da file clashes in testsuite Ulrich Weigand
05:20 Build Success: gcc-20020429 Kurt Wall
05:03 Re: LittleEndian Robert Dewar
04:51 Re: LittleEndian Allan Sandfeld Jensen
04:25 Bootstrap error with gcc-20020429 snapshot on Sun / Solaris8 glebourgeois
03:16 Re: [Fwd: Current state of MIPS16 support?] Dominic Sweetman
02:48 Passing options through gcc to linker D. Towner
02:15 Re: 3.1 regrename.c doesn't handle which_alternative==-1 Michael Matz
01:40 Re: ld segfaults in gcc-3.1's configuration Ralf Corsepius
01:25 Ada.Characters.{Wide_}Latin_9 should be deleted David Starner
01:08 Re: ld segfaults in gcc-3.1's configuration Jakub Jelinek
00:37 RE: What about boehm-gc under cygwin? Christian Jönsson
00:18 ld segfaults in gcc-3.1's configuration Ralf Corsepius

April 29, 2002
23:25 gcc 3.1 won't built along with binutils 2.12 on sparc-*-* Alexandre Oliva
23:16 Parallel cross-compiler installs [Was: want a,m,s,w,x whenbuilding gcc-3.1] Ralf Corsepius
22:42 Re: Problem with forward declaration within a namespace... Alexandre Oliva
22:24 Re: sizeof (_Bool) Aldy Hernandez
21:42 Re: Do you want to hear about xfree86 & -frename-registers Richard Henderson
21:38 Re: 3.1 regrename.c doesn't handle which_alternative==-1 Richard Henderson
21:34 Re: PR 6394 John David Anglin
21:33 RE: cross target report on gcc 3.1-20020423 Rekha Deshmukh
20:46 Re: fr30 FP format question Zack Weinberg
19:33 Re: fr30 FP format question Joel Sherrill
19:29 Re: fr30 FP format question Joel Sherrill
19:24 Re: fr30 FP format question Hans-Peter Nilsson
19:21 Re: cross target report on gcc 3.1-20020423 Joel Sherrill
19:19 Re: fr30 FP format question David Edelsohn
19:18 Re: cross target report on gcc 3.1-20020423 Joel Sherrill
19:14 Re: fr30 FP format question Joel Sherrill
19:10 Re: cross target report on gcc 3.1-20020423 Joel Sherrill
19:04 Do you want to hear about xfree86 & -frename-registers George Garvey
18:41 gcc-ss-20020429 is now available gccadmin
18:37 Re: bprob-1.da file clashes in testsuite Mark Mitchell
17:56 3.1 regrename.c doesn't handle which_alternative==-1 Brad Lucier
17:48 RE: FTensor on cygwin - partial success Billinghurst, David (CRTS)
17:25 Re: want a,m,s,w,x when building gcc-3.1 Richard Henderson
17:16 Re: pure and const functions John Wehle
16:17 Re: bprob-1.da file clashes in testsuite Janis Johnson
16:08 Re: fr30 FP format question Richard Henderson
14:52 Re: LittleEndian Robert Dewar
14:43 Re: LittleEndian Allan Sandfeld Jensen
14:36 Re: What about boehm-gc under cygwin? Tom Tromey
13:58 PR 6394 Mark Mitchell
13:20 RE: What about boehm-gc under cygwin? Christian Jönsson
13:14 RE: What about boehm-gc under cygwin? kelley.r.cook
13:10 Re: x86-64 as a subtarget of the i386 configuration Andi Kleen
12:35 Re: cross target report on gcc 3.1-20020423 Hans-Peter Nilsson
12:27 Re: cross target report on gcc 3.1-20020423 Hans-Peter Nilsson
12:24 Re: FTensor on cygwin - partial success Walter Landry
12:20 Re: fr30 FP format question Hans-Peter Nilsson
12:17 x86-64 as a subtarget of the i386 configuration Toon Moene
11:36 Re: seperating the gcc/ directory Phil Edwards
10:58 Re: [PATCH] Fix PR c/6343 (was: Re: GCC 3.1 Prerelease) Franz Sirl
10:36 bprob-1.da file clashes in testsuite Ulrich Weigand
10:22 Re: fr30 FP format question Zack Weinberg
10:09 Re: fr30 FP format question Joseph S. Myers
10:01 Re: Successful compile and install Janis Johnson
09:59 Re: Compile Results Janis Johnson
09:59 Re: Successful build of gcc 3.0.4 Janis Johnson
09:58 Re: Successful Build of GCC 3.0.4 Janis Johnson
09:52 Re: pure and const functions Mark Dettinger
09:34 Re: pure and const functions Chris Lattner
09:29 Re: pure and const functions Chris Lattner
09:23 Re: pure and const functions Robert Dewar
09:22 Re: pure and const functions Daniel Berlin
09:22 Re: FTensor on cygwin - partial success Janis Johnson
09:21 Re: cross target report on gcc 3.1-20020423 Stan Shebs
09:00 Re: cross target report on gcc 3.1-20020423 Jim Wilson
08:57 Re: success gcc-3.1-20020423 on macosx Janis Johnson
08:40 Re: pure and const functions Chris Lattner
08:30 Re: success gcc-3.1-20020423 on macosx Stan Shebs
08:30 Re: pure and const functions Robert Dewar
08:22 Re: pure and const functions Chris Lattner
08:05 Re: LittleEndian Tim Prince
07:39 RE: What about boehm-gc under cygwin? Robert Dewar
07:35 RE: What about boehm-gc under cygwin? Christian Jönsson
07:21 Re: cross target report on gcc 3.1-20020423 Joel Sherrill
07:18 Re: fr30 FP format question Joel Sherrill
07:09 FTensor on cygwin - partial success Billinghurst, David (CRTS)
07:07 Successful compile and install Paul Crittenden
07:02 Re: does g++ perform return-value-optimization? Gabriel Dos Reis
06:59 pooma on cygwin OK Billinghurst, David (CRTS)
06:50 RE: What about boehm-gc under cygwin? Billinghurst, David (CRTS)
06:48 Re: Propose PR 6160 as high priority Joseph S. Myers
06:44 Re: fr30 FP format question Toon Moene
06:00 Re: does g++ perform return-value-optimization? Paolo Carlini
05:44 does g++ perform return-value-optimization? Jeff Lee
05:39 Re: pure and const functions Mark Dettinger
05:18 Re: Propose PR 6160 as high priority Florian Weimer
03:59 Re: pure and const functions Robert Dewar
03:04 Re: pure and const functions Mark Dettinger
02:00 Re: The D Programming Language David Rasmussen
01:15 What about boehm-gc under cygwin? Christian Jönsson

April 28, 2002
23:32 About VLIW processor target =?gb2312?B?vaogzrC7qg==?=
23:07 LittleEndian Miri
22:40 Re: ok to use autogen to generate Makefile.in?... alternatives? Alexandre Oliva
22:27 RE: cross target report on gcc 3.1-20020423 Rekha Deshmukh
22:22 Re: Propose PR 6160 as high priority Alexandre Oliva
21:25 Re: 3.1 bootstrap failure on sparc-sun-solaris2.8 David S. Miller
20:23 PPC multilibs [Re: success gcc-3.1-20020423 on macosx] Bryce McKinlay
19:13 success gcc-3.1-20020423 on macosx Konstantin Olchanski
18:59 Re: 3.1 bootstrap failure on sparc-sun-solaris2.8 Hans-Peter Nilsson
17:59 Re: The D Programming Language Robert Lipe
17:44 3.1 bootstrap failure on sparc-sun-solaris2.8 Brad Lucier
16:36 seperating the gcc/ directory Dan D Carpenter
15:00 Re: [PATCH] Fix PR c/6343 (was: Re: GCC 3.1 Prerelease) Mark Mitchell
14:58 Re: [PATCH] Fix PR c/6343 (was: Re: GCC 3.1 Prerelease) Jason Merrill
13:19 Re: The D Programming Language David Rasmussen
12:49 Re: The D Programming Language David Rasmussen
12:49 Re: The D Programming Language Robert Dewar
11:59 [ast-optimizer-branch] Mainline merge as of 2002-04-27 Diego Novillo
10:59 Re: [PATCH] Fix PR c/6343 (was: Re: GCC 3.1 Prerelease) Mark Mitchell
10:25 Re: The D Programming Language Tim Hollebeek
10:17 [DFA] better scheduler debug dumps Jan Hubicka
08:44 Re: The D Programming Language David Rasmussen
07:39 Re: [PATCH] Fix PR c/6343 (was: Re: GCC 3.1 Prerelease) Franz Sirl
01:32 The D Programming Language Walter
00:54 c++/6492: new 3.1 regression for Boost Paolo Carlini

April 27, 2002
23:23 Re: want a,m,s,w,x when building gcc-3.1 Ralf Corsepius
23:21 post 3.1 release David S. Miller
23:17 optimize in GCC and ADS James Chen
21:19 Compile Results Kathy Gerber
15:49 Successful build of gcc 3.0.4 Rob Sykes
12:44 fr30 FP format question Joel Sherrill
11:58 Re: Number of 1's in 64 bit number...[don't read if not interestedin algos/math...] David Rasmussen
11:45 Re: libltdl Tom Tromey
11:20 Re: Testing 3.1 g++ applications on cygwin Gerald Pfeifer
11:03 libltdl Mark Mitchell
09:57 Re: New regression in gcc-3.1 (?) Paolo Carlini
09:49 New regression in gcc-3.1 (?) Michael Veksler
09:15 Re: inliner in gcc-3.1 Kurt Garloff
07:41 hppa1.1 embedded update Joel Sherrill
07:39 Re: cross target report on gcc 3.1-20020423 Joel Sherrill

April 26, 2002
19:08 Re: How do I prevent gcc from linking with GNU standard C library Daniel Jacobowitz
18:54 Re: How do I prevent gcc from linking with GNU standard C library Roger Sayle
18:06 can *you* build gcc-3.0.4 for m68k-elf on HP/UX 10.20 Peter Barada
17:53 Re: cross target report on gcc 3.1-20020423 Jim Wilson
17:02 Re: sizeof (_Bool) Joseph S. Myers
16:49 How do I prevent gcc from linking with GNU standard C library Tanveer Ahmad
16:40 Re: sizeof (_Bool) Stan Shebs
16:30 Re: [3.1] Ada bug reporting points to README.GNATPRO Robert Dewar
16:29 Re: sizeof (_Bool) mike stump
16:14 Re: sizeof (_Bool) Joseph S. Myers
16:12 Re: PA specifies invalid T_ADAFLAGS Robert Dewar
16:09 Re: Gnats and spam Robert Dewar
15:53 Re: Testing 3.1 g++ applications on cygwin Paolo Carlini
15:52 Re: Questions about ``[PATCH] GCC side of .eh_frame_hdr support (take 3)'' Jakub Jelinek
15:49 sizeof (_Bool) Stan Shebs
15:48 Re: Questions about ``[PATCH] GCC side of .eh_frame_hdr support (take 3)'' Loren James Rittle
15:41 Re: Testing 3.1 g++ applications on cygwin Janis Johnson
15:25 Re: PATCH for Re: 6350: How to upgrade priority to high? Mark Mitchell
15:24 Re: [3.1] Ada bug reporting points to README.GNATPRO Florian Weimer
15:04 PATCH for Re: 6350: How to upgrade priority to high? Gerald Pfeifer
14:40 Re: bootstrap problem on sparc-sun-solaris2.7: libtool configure failed Phil Edwards
14:33 Successful Build of GCC 3.0.4 Jeff Stephens
14:16 Re: Testing 3.1 g++ applications on cygwin Gerald Pfeifer
14:06 Re: Testing 3.1 g++ applications on cygwin Janis Johnson
13:40 Re: Current GCC status (was: PATCH: Fix in-source configurationregressionfrom gcc 3.0.4) Gerald Pfeifer
13:04 c++/6479: serious regression! Paolo Carlini
12:59 Re: Current GCC status (was: PATCH: Fix in-source configuration regressionfrom gcc 3.0.4) Jonathan Lennox
12:49 Re: pure and const functions Jakub Jelinek
12:33 Re: pure and const functions Russ Allbery
12:11 Re: Gnats and spam Tom Tromey
12:00 RE: pure and const functions Mark Mitchell
11:50 Re: h8300-coff vs h8300-rtems law
11:46 Re: bison 1.33 problem with mainline c-parse.in: yyfree_stacks Michael Elizabeth Chastain
11:28 Re: FIX was [Fwd: gcc 3.1 hppa failures] law
11:27 Re: PA specifies invalid T_ADAFLAGS John David Anglin
11:20 Re: pure and const functions Magnus Fromreide
11:03 Re: pure and const functions Joseph S. Myers
11:01 Re: pure and const functions Chris Lattner
10:59 Re: pure and const functions Chris Lattner
10:56 Re: pure and const functions Magnus Fromreide
10:56 Re: PA specifies invalid T_ADAFLAGS law
10:56 Re: pure and const functions Zack Weinberg
10:54 Re: pure and const functions Tony Finch
10:51 Re: PA specifies invalid T_ADAFLAGS law
10:48 Re: PA specifies invalid T_ADAFLAGS law
10:47 Re: Current GCC status (was: PATCH: Fix in-source configurationregression from gcc 3.0.4) Mark Mitchell
10:46 [3.1] Ada bug reporting points to README.GNATPRO Matthias Klose
10:43 Re: pure and const functions Chris Lattner
10:43 Re: PA specifies invalid T_ADAFLAGS law
10:37 Re: bison 1.33 problem with mainline c-parse.in: yyfree_stacks John David Anglin
10:36 Re: Testing 3.1 g++ applications on cygwin Peter Schmid
10:35 Re: pure and const functions Kris Warkentin
10:34 Re: pure and const functions Chris Lattner
10:31 Re: pure and const functions Magnus Fromreide
10:31 Re: bison 1.33 problem with mainline c-parse.in: yyfree_stacks John David Anglin
10:30 Re: Gnats and spam Joseph S. Myers
10:30 Re: pure and const functions Chris Lattner
10:26 Re: pure and const functions Chris Lattner
10:22 Re: pure and const functions Tim Hollebeek
10:21 Re: bison 1.33 problem with mainline c-parse.in: yyfree_stacks Joseph S. Myers
10:21 Re: pure and const functions Kris Warkentin
10:17 Re: PATCH for Re: http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-3.1/changes.html - linux/x86 debug formats? Richard Henderson
09:53 RE: pure and const functions Chris Lattner
09:47 Re: bison 1.33 problem with mainline c-parse.in: yyfree_stacks John David Anglin
09:39 Re: Testing 3.1 g++ applications on cygwin Janis Johnson
09:35 Re: PA specifies invalid T_ADAFLAGS John David Anglin
09:30 Re: PA specifies invalid T_ADAFLAGS law
09:18 Re: Testing 3.1 g++ applications on cygwin Janis Johnson
09:07 Re: patch/proposal: obsolete configurations in 3.1 Janis Johnson
08:59 Re: Gnats and spam Tom Tromey
08:56 bison 1.33 problem with mainline c-parse.in: yyfree_stacks Michael Elizabeth Chastain
08:51 Re: Current GCC status (was: PATCH: Fix in-source configuration regression from gcc 3.0.4) Alexandre Oliva
08:46 PATCH for Re: http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-3.1/changes.html - linux/x86debug formats? Gerald Pfeifer
08:37 RE: patch/proposal: obsolete configurations in 3.1 Dana, Eric
08:36 installation Vu Khuong
08:27 Re: Testing 3.1 g++ applications on cygwin Gerald Pfeifer
08:20 3.1 Snapshot gcc-3.1-20020423 Test Failures Kurt Wall
08:20 Re: inliner in gcc-3.1 Kurt Garloff
08:20 Re: Testing 3.1 g++ applications on cygwin Janis Johnson
08:11 Re: can you help me? Mark Dettinger
07:36 Re: PA specifies invalid T_ADAFLAGS Matthew Wilcox
07:28 gnat with gcc 3.1 build failure Joel Sherrill
07:01 Re: cross target report on gcc 3.1-20020423 Joel Sherrill
06:36 Re: cross target report on gcc 3.1-20020423 Jakub Jelinek
06:34 Re: FIX was [Fwd: gcc 3.1 hppa failures] David S. Miller
06:33 Re: cross target report on gcc 3.1-20020423 David S. Miller
06:29 FIX was [Fwd: gcc 3.1 hppa failures] Joel Sherrill
06:21 Re: cross target report on gcc 3.1-20020423 Joel Sherrill
05:38 RE: bootstrap problem on sparc-sun-solaris2.7: libtool configure failed Rupert Wood
05:16 Re: bootstrap problem on sparc-sun-solaris2.7: libtool configure failed Christian Jönsson
05:08 pure and const functions Mark Dettinger
04:23 Re: cross target report on gcc 3.1-20020423 David S. Miller
04:20 Re: [OT] Re: Number of 1's in 64 bit number...[don't read if not intereste d in algos/math...] Gabriel Paubert
04:20 Current GCC status (was: PATCH: Fix in-source configuration regressionfrom gcc 3.0.4) Gerald Pfeifer
04:19 Re: cross target report on gcc 3.1-20020423 Joel Sherrill
04:10 Re: inliner in gcc-3.1 Gerald Pfeifer
04:06 Re: gcc 3.1 hppa failures Joel Sherrill
02:41 Re: PA specifies invalid T_ADAFLAGS Richard Kenner
02:17 [OT] Re: Number of 1's in 64 bit number...[don't read if not intereste d in algos/math...] Bernd Jendrissek
02:14 Re: Declarations in anonymous namespaces Michael Matz
01:55 Re: bootstrap problem on sparc-sun-solaris2.7: libtool configure failed Robert Schiele
01:48 can you help me? lplain
00:30 Re: Questions about ``[PATCH] GCC side of .eh_frame_hdr support (take 3)'' Jakub Jelinek
00:17 Release Schedule Jim Blomo
00:00 Re: Questions about ``[PATCH] GCC side of .eh_frame_hdr support (take 3)'' Richard Henderson

April 25, 2002
23:44 Re: Questions about ``[PATCH] GCC side of .eh_frame_hdr support (take 3)'' Loren James Rittle
23:26 Gnats and spam Neil Booth
23:18 Testing 3.1 g++ applications on cygwin Billinghurst, David (CRTS)
22:55 Re: ICE bootstrapping gcc 2002-04-25 trunk on sparc32-linux: crtstuff.c Christian Jönsson
22:51 Re: PA specifies invalid T_ADAFLAGS Matthew Wilcox
21:53 Declarations in anonymous namespaces aaronwl
21:14 Re: PA specifies invalid T_ADAFLAGS John David Anglin
20:52 Re: PA specifies invalid T_ADAFLAGS Robert Dewar
20:51 Re: PA specifies invalid T_ADAFLAGS Robert Dewar
19:58 Re: PA specifies invalid T_ADAFLAGS John David Anglin
19:55 Re: PA specifies invalid T_ADAFLAGS Robert Dewar
19:45 Re: PA specifies invalid T_ADAFLAGS John David Anglin
19:37 Re: PA specifies invalid T_ADAFLAGS Robert Dewar
19:12 Re: PA specifies invalid T_ADAFLAGS Robert Dewar
19:06 Re: cross target report on gcc 3.1-20020423 David S. Miller
18:58 Re: C++ 3.04 compiler mike stump
18:25 Re: ICE bootstrapping gcc 2002-04-25 trunk on sparc32-linux:crtstuff.c David S. Miller
17:55 Re: inliner in gcc-3.1 Daniel Berlin
17:44 Re: Number of 1's in 64 bit number...[don't read if not interestedin algos/math...] Daniel Berlin
17:29 Re: C++ aliasing rules mike stump
16:56 Re: gcc 3.1 hppa failures Joe Buck
16:51 Re: patch/proposal: obsolete configurations in 3.1 Jason Merrill
16:44 Re: C++ 3.04 compiler Joe Buck
16:44 Re: ICE bootstrapping gcc 2002-04-25 trunk on sparc32-linux: crtstuff.c Hans-Peter Nilsson
15:51 C++ 3.04 compiler Teresa Cottom
15:47 Re: inliner in gcc-3.1 Kurt Garloff
15:39 Re: Number of 1's in 64 bit number...[don't read if not interestedin algos/math...] Wei Qin
15:30 Re: config.sub Mark Mitchell
15:23 Re: inliner in gcc-3.1 Kurt Garloff
15:15 Re: config.sub Hans-Peter Nilsson
15:13 Re: Number of 1's in 64 bit number...[don't read if not interested in algos/math...] Richard Henderson
15:06 config.sub Mark Mitchell
15:04 Re: inliner in gcc-3.1 Kurt Garloff
13:14 Re: PA specifies invalid T_ADAFLAGS John David Anglin
12:59 Re: ICE bootstrapping gcc 2002-04-25 trunk on sparc32-linux: crtstuff.c Christian Jönsson
12:57 Re: [PATCH] Fix PR c/6343 (was: Re: GCC 3.1 Prerelease) Jason Merrill
12:23 [PATCH] Fix PR c/6343 (was: Re: GCC 3.1 Prerelease) Franz Sirl
12:15 [OT] Number of 1's in 64 bit number Claus Fischer
12:13 Re: Number of 1's in 64 bit number...[don't read if not interestedin algos/math...] Wei Qin
11:24 ICE bootstrapping gcc 2002-04-25 trunk on sparc32-linux: crtstuff.c Christian Jönsson
11:13 Re: Number of 1's in 64 bit number...[don't read if not interested in algos/math...] Gabriel Paubert
11:04 bootstrap problem on sparc-sun-solaris2.7: libtool configure failed Joe Buck
10:59 Re: Mined out of comp.std.c... Peter Barada
10:57 Re: gcc 2.95.x interesting c++ parser error (bug). Phil Edwards
10:45 Re: C++ aliasing rules Jason Merrill
10:36 Re: GCC 3.0.4 built on RS/6000 with AIX 5.1 Janis Johnson
10:33 Re: Number of 1's in 64 bit number...[don't read if not interested in algos/math...] Nathan Sidwell
10:16 Re: Exception handling problem on x86-64 Richard Henderson
10:13 Re: ALL toolchain builds FAIL on alpha but not on intel Richard Henderson
10:08 Re: Number of 1's in 64 bit number...[don't read if not interestedin algos/math...] Wei Qin
10:07 Re: Exception handling problem on x86-64 David Edelsohn
09:57 GCC 3.0.4 built on RS/6000 with AIX 5.1 Labao Lan
09:51 Re: -fprofile-arcs overwriting return value of fn. Michael Matz
09:46 h8300-coff vs h8300-rtems Joel Sherrill
09:41 Re: Number of 1's in 64 bit number...[don't read if not interested in algos/math...] kelley.r.cook
09:36 Re: inliner in gcc-3.1 Gerald Pfeifer
09:25 -fprofile-arcs overwriting return value of fn. Johannes Thoma
09:19 Re: PA specifies invalid T_ADAFLAGS John David Anglin
09:17 Re: Overzealous implicit typename warning Nathan Sidwell
08:57 Re: Overzealous implicit typename warning Paolo Carlini
08:45 Overzealous implicit typename warning Wimmer Andreas (IMPRO)
07:35 Re: gcc 2.95.x interesting c++ parser error (bug). Karel Gardas
06:57 cross target report on gcc 3.1-20020423 Joel Sherrill
06:36 gcc 3.1 hppa failures Joel Sherrill
06:30 ALL toolchain builds FAIL on alpha but not on intel Matthew Bemis
05:35 Successful build of GCC and G77 3.0.x on MacOSX Kelly, Michael
03:37 Re: PA specifies invalid T_ADAFLAGS Richard Kenner
03:31 Re: PA specifies invalid T_ADAFLAGS Richard Kenner
03:16 Re: gcc 2.95.x interesting c++ parser error (bug). Jason Merrill
03:13 RE: Mined out of comp.std.c... Rupert Wood
02:58 Re: namespaces Paolo Carlini
02:56 Re: PA specifies invalid T_ADAFLAGS Michael Matz
02:56 Re: namespaces Gerald Pfeifer
02:55 RE: Mined out of comp.std.c... Rupert Wood
02:54 Exception handling problem on x86-64 Bo Thorsen
02:47 namespaces eziolkow
02:12 Re: PA specifies invalid T_ADAFLAGS Olivier Hainque
02:06 RE: Mined out of comp.std.c... Rupert Wood
01:59 Re: Mined out of comp.std.c... Tim Hollebeek
01:53 RE: Mined out of comp.std.c... Rupert Wood
01:46 Re: Mined out of comp.std.c... Nathan Sidwell
01:39 RE: Mined out of comp.std.c... Rupert Wood
01:12 Re: http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-3.1/changes.html - linux/x86 debug formats? Richard Henderson
01:11 Re: Mined out of comp.std.c... Richard Henderson
00:49 Re: C++ aliasing rules Nathan Sidwell
00:48 Re: PA specifies invalid T_ADAFLAGS Richard Henderson
00:41 Re: inliner in gcc-3.1 Richard Henderson
00:39 Re: Mined out of comp.std.c... Alan Modra
00:38 Re: Number of 1's in 64 bit number...[don't read if not interestedin algos/math...] Gerald Pfeifer
00:21 Re: http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-3.1/changes.html - linux/x86 debug formats? Alex Hornby
00:18 Re: inliner in gcc-3.1 Gerald Pfeifer
00:08 Re: PA specifies invalid T_ADAFLAGS Arnaud Charlet

April 24, 2002
23:51 Mined out of comp.std.c... Zack Weinberg
23:08 Re: Number of 1's in 64 bit number...[don't read if not interested in algos/math...] Jaswant
22:47 Re: Number of 1's in 64 bit number...[don't read if not interestedin algos/math...] Vivek Srivastava
22:35 Re: PA specifies invalid T_ADAFLAGS John David Anglin
22:08 Re: Number of 1's in 64 bit number...[don't read if not interested in algos/math...] Alan Modra
22:07 Re: PA specifies invalid T_ADAFLAGS Robert Dewar
21:55 Re: PA specifies invalid T_ADAFLAGS John David Anglin
21:44 Number of 1's in 64 bit number...[don't read if not interested in algos/math...] Preeti Aira
21:41 Re: PA specifies invalid T_ADAFLAGS John David Anglin
21:39 PR 6304 Mark Mitchell
21:27 Re: PA specifies invalid T_ADAFLAGS John David Anglin
20:44 Re: PA specifies invalid T_ADAFLAGS Robert Dewar
20:37 Re: PA specifies invalid T_ADAFLAGS Matthew Wilcox
20:26 Re: PA specifies invalid T_ADAFLAGS Robert Dewar
20:09 Re: PA specifies invalid T_ADAFLAGS Matthew Wilcox
20:06 Re: PA specifies invalid T_ADAFLAGS Robert Dewar
19:59 Re: PA specifies invalid T_ADAFLAGS Robert Dewar
19:03 Re: PA specifies invalid T_ADAFLAGS Richard Kenner
16:44 Re: GCC 3.1 prerelease Kurt Wall
16:35 Re: gcc, support, for, nested, low-overhead, looping Michael Hayes
16:31 Re: Cross-testing: check-target-libstdc++-v3 with dejagnu in build tree. Tom Tromey
15:24 Re: inliner in gcc-3.1 Daniel Berlin
14:28 Re: GCC performance regression - up to 20% ? Allan Sandfeld Jensen
13:38 Re: PA specifies invalid T_ADAFLAGS Arnaud Charlet
13:32 Re: PA specifies invalid T_ADAFLAGS John David Anglin
13:27 Re: C++ aliasing rules Dan Nicolaescu
13:14 Re: PA specifies invalid T_ADAFLAGS Arnaud Charlet
13:03 Re: GCC 3.1 Prerelease Jason Merrill
12:43 Re: GCC 3.1 Prerelease Richard Henderson
12:12 Re: PA specifies invalid T_ADAFLAGS Matthew Wilcox
12:07 Re: Blitz++ build and test guide Gerald Pfeifer
12:04 Re: PA specifies invalid T_ADAFLAGS John David Anglin
12:03 Re: GCC 3.1 Prerelease Franz Sirl
11:27 Re: Questions about ``[PATCH] GCC side of .eh_frame_hdr support (take 3)'' Richard Henderson
11:09 Questions about ``[PATCH] GCC side of .eh_frame_hdr support (take 3)'' Loren James Rittle
11:03 Re: sh le fp arg passing Stephen Clarke
10:56 Re: GCC 3.1 prerelease Joseph S. Myers
10:32 Re: GCC 3.1 Prerelease Jason Merrill
10:30 Re: GCC 3.1 Prerelease Mark Mitchell
10:27 Re: GCC 3.1 Prerelease Tom Tromey
10:14 PA specifies invalid T_ADAFLAGS Matthew Wilcox
10:07 Re: GCC 3.1 Prerelease Alexandre Petit-Bianco
09:49 Re: GCC 3.1 Prerelease Mark Mitchell
09:40 Re: GCC 3.1 prerelease Mark Mitchell
09:38 Re: gcc-3.1 ICE on ppc-linux, regression wrt 2.95 David Edelsohn
09:08 Re: Blitz++ build and test guide Janis Johnson
08:45 Re: mips n64 eh failures Mark Mitchell
08:40 Re: gcc-3.1 ICE on ppc-linux, regression wrt 2.95 Michal Moskal
08:35 gcc-3.1 ICE on ppc-linux, regression wrt 2.95 Michal Moskal
07:07 Blitz++ build and test guide Billinghurst, David (CRTS)
06:58 Re: Illegal instruction on sparc32-linux David S. Miller
06:43 Help with initializing static data members of a class template..... Thomas J Amato
06:36 Re: C++ aliasing rules Andreas Schwab
05:51 Re: howto use -fstack-check Manfred Hollstein
05:45 AW: howto use -fstack-check Scholz Maik (CM-CR/EES3) *
05:34 Re: howto use -fstack-check Manfred Hollstein
05:22 AW: howto use -fstack-check Scholz Maik (CM-CR/EES3) *
04:49 Re: howto use -fstack-check Manfred Hollstein
04:37 howto use -fstack-check Scholz Maik (CM-CR/EES3) *
04:23 inliner in gcc-3.1 Kurt Garloff
03:42 Re: C++ aliasing changes on mainline (was: GCC 3.1 Prerelease) Jan Hubicka
03:32 Re: C++ aliasing changes on mainline (was: GCC 3.1 Prerelease) Paolo Carlini
01:00 Re: GCC performance regression - its memset ! Jan Hubicka
00:50 Re: GCC performance regression - its memset ! Jan Hubicka
00:50 C++ aliasing changes on mainline (was: GCC 3.1 Prerelease) Gerald Pfeifer
00:30 Re: GCC performance regression - its memset ! Jakub Jelinek
00:17 Re: GCC performance regression - its memset ! Jan Hubicka

April 23, 2002
19:52 sh le fp arg passing mike stump
19:35 Re: C++ aliasing rules mike stump
19:24 Re: mips n64 eh failures Richard Henderson
19:23 31 build problem on solaris 2.8; ld complaint about elf32/elf64 George.R.Goffe
18:37 Re: GCC 3.1 prerelease Phil Edwards
18:20 Re: GCC 3.1 prerelease Kurt Wall
18:02 Re: mips n64 eh failures Richard Henderson
18:00 Re: http://www.gnu.org/software/gcc/gcc-3.1/criteria.html Wes Groleau
17:12 Re: mips n64 eh failures Richard Henderson
16:59 Re: Attention GCJ devel team Bryce McKinlay
16:53 Re: mips n64 eh failures Richard Henderson
16:30 Re: mips n64 eh failures Mark Mitchell
16:15 mips n64 eh failures Richard Henderson
16:11 Re: GCC 3.1 Release Bryce McKinlay
16:05 Re: GCC 3.1 Prerelease Tom Tromey
15:48 Re: peephole2 question Alan Lehotsky
15:36 Re: peephole2 question Richard Henderson
15:10 Re: peephole2 question Peter Barada
15:08 Re: GCC 3.1 Prerelease Richard Henderson
15:02 Re: GCC 3.1 Prerelease Franz Sirl
14:56 Re: GCC 3.1 Prerelease Per Bothner
14:52 Re: GCC 3.1 Prerelease Tom Tromey
14:21 Re: GCC 3.1 Prerelease Tom Tromey
13:59 Re: GCC 3.1 Prerelease Gerald Pfeifer
13:52 Re: C++ aliasing rules Jason Merrill
13:50 Re: GCC 3.1 Prerelease Richard Henderson
13:38 Re: GCC 3.1 Prerelease Mark Mitchell
13:36 GCC 3.1 prerelease Mark Mitchell
13:35 Re: GCC performance regression - its memset ! Michel LESPINASSE
13:28 Re: GCC 3.1 Prerelease Richard Henderson
13:25 Re: GCC 3.1 Prerelease Mark Mitchell
13:19 Re: GCC 3.1 Prerelease Mark Mitchell
12:22 Re: GCC 3.1 Prerelease Richard Henderson
12:19 Re: GCC 3.1 Prerelease Jason Merrill
11:53 Re: GCC 3.1 Prerelease John David Anglin
11:42 Cross-testing: check-target-libstdc++-v3 with dejagnu in build tree. Hans-Peter Nilsson
11:04 Re: GCC 3.1 Prerelease Richard Henderson
10:46 Re: GCC 3.1 Release David O'Brien
10:40 Re: GCC 3.1 Prerelease Paolo Carlini
10:30 Re: GCC 3.1 Prerelease Franz Sirl
10:18 Re: [AST-optimizer-branch] Double chaining statements (proposal) Sebastian Pop
10:12 Re: the continuing build problems I'm having Janis Johnson
09:49 Re: GCC 3.1 Prerelease Per Bothner
09:45 Re: GCC 3.1 Prerelease Jakub Jelinek
09:36 Re: GCC 3.0.4 build report from Womo 20020423, G++ compiler working with AIX 4.3.3.0 Janis Johnson
09:33 Re: GCC 3.1 Prerelease Joe Buck
09:30 Re: AST-Optimizer and De-Parse James Michael DuPont
09:13 Re: GCC 3.1 Prerelease Mark Mitchell
09:12 Re: GCC 3.1 Prerelease Mark Mitchell
09:08 Re: GCC 3.1 Prerelease Mark Mitchell
08:57 Re: GCC 3.1 Prerelease Per Bothner
08:50 Re: [AST-optimizer-branch] Double chaining statements (proposal) Diego Novillo
08:44 Re: [AST-optimizer-branch] Double chaining statements (proposal) Jan Hubicka
08:24 Re: GCC 3.0.4 build report from Womo 20020423, G++ compiler working with AIX 4.3.3.0 David Edelsohn
08:23 Re: GCC 3.1 Prerelease Gerald Pfeifer
08:22 GCC 3.0.4 build report from Womo 20020423, G++ compiler working withAIX 4.3.3.0 Wolfgang Moser
07:49 Re: Why is the tree often locked by `gccadmin'? David O'Brien
07:39 Re: AST-Optimizer and De-Parse Diego Novillo
07:28 Re: [AST-optimizer-branch] Double chaining statements (proposal) Diego Novillo
07:14 gcc for UWin 3.0 Solomon, David
06:53 Re: crt0.o and stuff Manfred Hollstein
06:33 Re: GCC performance regression - its memset ! Andreas Schwab
06:23 Re: single parse vs multi parse Diego Novillo
05:46 Re: Attention GCJ devel team Oskar Liljeblad
05:43 Re: GCC 3.1 Prerelease Jason Merrill
05:03 Re: Teaching GCC about fmadd variant Daniel Glastonbury
04:54 Re: GCC performance regression - its memset ! Falk Hueffner
04:48 Re: gcc, support, for, nested, low-overhead, looping Michael Hayes
04:32 single parse vs multi parse akey
04:13 Re: GCC 3.1 Prerelease Alan Modra
04:04 Re: GCC 3.1 Prerelease Franz Sirl
03:53 NECESITAMOS PERSONAS EMPRENDEDORAS coupmoney
03:28 Re: GCC 3.1 Prerelease Alan Modra
02:53 Re: GCC performance regression - its memset! Richard Henderson
02:51 Re: GCC performance regression - its memset! Jan Hubicka
02:39 Re: ifcvt related i386 misscompilation (3.1 branch and mainline) Richard Henderson
02:25 Re: GCC performance regression - its memset ! Jan Hubicka
02:12 Re: ifcvt related i386 misscompilation (3.1 branch and mainline) Jan Hubicka
02:04 GCC 3.1 Prerelease Mark Mitchell
00:45 Re: Why is the tree often locked by `gccadmin'? Joseph S. Myers

April 22, 2002
23:30 Re: GCC performance regression - its memset! Michel LESPINASSE
23:07 Re: GCC performance regression - its memset! Michel LESPINASSE
22:25 Re: GCC performance regression - its memset! Roger Sayle
22:00 Re: GCC 3.1 Release Kaveh R. Ghazi
20:13 Re: PROFILE_HOOK label_no Alan Modra
20:11 Re: the continuing build problems I'm having George.R.Goffe
20:00 Re: GCC 3.1 Release Bryce McKinlay
19:44 RE: GCC 3.1 Prerelease Billinghurst, David (CRTS)
19:25 Re: GCC 3.1 Release David O'Brien
19:05 Re: GCC performance regression - up to 20% ? Andrew Pinski
19:01 Re: Why is the tree often locked by `gccadmin'? Andrew Pinski
18:38 Why is the tree often locked by `gccadmin'? David O'Brien
18:37 gcc-ss-20020422 is now available gccadmin
18:30 Is there data on how many use gcc? Art Mellor
18:20 Re: GCC performance regression - up to 20% ? Carlo Wood
17:49 Re: GCC performance regression - up to 20% ? Andrew Pinski
17:42 Re: GCC performance regression - its memset ! Michel LESPINASSE
17:39 Re: GCC performance regression - up to 20% ? Michel LESPINASSE
17:13 Re: GCC performance regression - its memset ! Richard Henderson
17:10 Re: GCC performance regression - its memset ! Michel LESPINASSE
16:59 Re: GCC performance regression - its memset ! Richard Henderson
15:27 Re: GCC performance regression - its memset ! Segher Boessenkool
15:10 Re: GCC performance regression - its memset ! Michel LESPINASSE
15:06 cpplib issues [was re: c/6300] Neil Booth
14:58 Re: ifcvt related i386 misscompilation (3.1 branch and mainline) Richard Henderson
14:41 Re: GCC performance regression - its memset ! Jason R Thorpe
14:35 Re: ifcvt related i386 misscompilation (3.1 branch and mainline) Jan Hubicka
14:33 Re: ifcvt related i386 misscompilation (3.1 branch and mainline) Richard Henderson
14:32 GCC performance regression - its memset ! Michel LESPINASSE
14:24 RTL flag usage Janis Johnson
13:34 ifcvt related i386 misscompilation (3.1 branch and mainline) Jan Hubicka
13:11 Re: Release Mangement Support From HP Toon Moene
12:12 RE: Inefficient register passing structs containing QI values Chris Lattner
11:30 Re: length of variable names mike stump
11:22 Re: Platform...? Java Bytecode!!!! Per Bothner
11:10 Re: Memory conflict between C and C++ programs mike stump
10:56 Re: Platform...? Java Bytecode!!!! Per Bothner
10:52 Re: GCC 3.1 Prerelease Mark Mitchell
10:50 Re: Platform...? Java Bytecode!!!! Florian Weimer
10:46 Re: GCC 3.1 Prerelease Franz Sirl
10:26 Re: Platform...? Java Bytecode!!!! Florian Weimer
10:25 Re: v8.S dwarf2 eh frame issues again :( Jakub Jelinek
10:11 Re: Release Mangement Support From HP Benjamin Kosnik
09:38 Release Mangement Support From HP Mark Mitchell
09:36 Re: Platform...? Java Bytecode!!!! Diego Novillo
09:25 Re: Platform...? Java Bytecode!!!! Luxspes
09:10 Re: Platform...? Java Bytecode!!!! Florian Weimer
09:09 Hot to generate Java Bytecodes? Luxspes
09:07 length of variable names Pieter De Ceuninck
08:55 Inefficient register passing structs containing QI values. D. Towner
08:52 Platform...? Java Bytecode!!!! Luxspes
08:42 Re: 6350: How to upgrade priority to high? (Re: GCC 3.1 Prerelease) Michael Veksler
08:25 Re: Loop unrolling-related Bench++ regressions? Roger Sayle
08:23 Re: 6350: How to upgrade priority to high? (Re: GCC 3.1 Prerelease) Mark Mitchell
08:04 Re: GCC performance regression - up to 20% ? Johannes Stezenbach
07:48 crt0.o and stuff Momchil Velikov
07:38 Re: GCC 3.1 Prerelease Mark Mitchell
07:34 Re: Teaching GCC about fmadd variant Daniel Jacobowitz
07:21 Re: GCC performance regression - up to 20% ? law
07:15 PROFILE_HOOK label_no Alan Modra
07:11 Re: Memory conflict between C and C++ programs Carlo Wood
07:11 Re: GCC performance regression - up to 20% ? Falk Hueffner
06:58 Re: GCC performance regression - up to 20% ? Carlo Wood
06:42 Re: header files Jeff Sturm
05:56 Re: Loop unrolling-related Bench++ regressions? Gerald Pfeifer
04:57 header files ugendreshwar kudupudi
04:07 Memory conflict between C and C++ programs Priyadarshini K
03:43 Re: GCC 3.1 Prerelease Wolfgang Bangerth
03:20 gcc, support, for, nested, low-overhead, looping Saira
01:47 Re: GCC 3.1 Prerelease Gerald Pfeifer
01:34 Re: GCC performance regression - up to 20% ? Gerald Pfeifer
01:27 Re: Attention GCJ devel team Raif S. Naffah
01:17 Teaching GCC about fmadd variant Daniel Glastonbury
00:40 c99_classification_macros_c.cc Jakub Jelinek
00:17 [SuperH] reload issue which prevents bootstrap NIIBE Yutaka
00:13 Re: GCC performance regression - up to 20% ? Andreas Jaeger
00:07 Re: GCC 3.1 Prerelease Richard Henderson

April 21, 2002
23:46 Re: GCC 3.1 Prerelease Toon Moene
23:19 Re: GCC performance regression - up to 20% ? Michel LESPINASSE
23:17 Re: Attention GCJ devel team Nic Ferrier
22:01 Re: http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-3.1/changes.html Bryce McKinlay
20:54 Re: Attention GCJ devel team Bryce McKinlay
19:16 Re: GCC 3.1 Prerelease John David Anglin
17:48 Re: Obsolete configurations, round 3 Peter A. Castro
17:00 Re: v8.S dwarf2 eh frame issues again :( David S. Miller
16:54 Re: http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-3.1/changes.html Aldy Hernandez
15:05 Re: GCC 3.1 Prerelease Mark Mitchell
14:16 Re: gcc 2.95.x interesting c++ parser error (bug). Florian Weimer
13:50 Re: GCC 3.1 Prerelease Richard Henderson
12:57 Re: GCC 3.1 Prerelease Franz Sirl
11:48 Re: GCC 3.1 Prerelease Mark Mitchell
11:47 Re: Loop unrolling-related Bench++ regressions? Roger Sayle
11:27 Re: gcc 2.95.x interesting c++ parser error (bug). Karel Gardas
09:22 Re: GCC 3.1 Prerelease Tom Tromey
08:49 Re: Warning: gcc (3.1 branch) is broken for target i686-pc-mingw32 Steven Bosscher
08:49 Re: Warning: gcc (3.1 branch) is broken for target i686-pc-mingw32 Jeff Sturm
08:43 Can't bootstrap gcc-3.1/ada: "interfac.ads" must be recompiled Christian Jönsson
08:16 Re: Warning: gcc (3.1 branch) is broken for target i686-pc-mingw32 Andreas Jaeger
08:11 Re: GCC 3.1 Prerelease Andreas Schwab
07:58 Re: v8.S dwarf2 eh frame issues again :( Jeff Sturm
07:29 Re: GCC performance regression - up to 20% ? Andi Kleen
07:21 Re: Warning: gcc (3.1 branch) is broken for target i686-pc-mingw32 Adam Megacz
07:06 [Ada] GNAT manuals & RCS tags Laurent Guerby
05:46 Re: GCC 3.1 Prerelease Toon Moene
04:32 Re: GCC performance regression - up to 20% ? Jan Hubicka
03:47 Re: gcc 2.95.x interesting c++ parser error (bug). Florian Weimer
03:41 Re: GCC 3.1 Prerelease Gerald Pfeifer
03:38 Re: GCC performance regression - up to 20% ? Andreas Jaeger
03:08 Re: v8.S dwarf2 eh frame issues again :( David S. Miller
03:05 Re: v8.S dwarf2 eh frame issues again :( Gerald Pfeifer
02:50 Re: v8.S dwarf2 eh frame issues again :( David S. Miller
02:45 Re: v8.S dwarf2 eh frame issues again :( Christian Jönsson
02:40 Re: v8.S dwarf2 eh frame issues again :( David S. Miller
02:24 Re: v8.S dwarf2 eh frame issues again :( Christian Jönsson
00:51 6350: How to upgrade priority to high? (Re: GCC 3.1 Prerelease) Michael Veksler

April 20, 2002
22:13 GCC amd Celeron CPUs Bobby McNulty Junior
22:09 test Bobby McNulty Junior
21:44 Re: GCC 3.1 Prerelease Alan Modra
20:45 Re: GCC 3.1 Prerelease Mark Mitchell
20:18 Re: GCC 3.1 Prerelease Mark Mitchell
20:16 Re: GCC 3.1 Prerelease Per Bothner
20:13 RE: GCC 3.1 Prerelease Mark Mitchell
20:09 Re: GCC 3.1 Prerelease David S. Miller
20:08 Re: GCC 3.1 Prerelease John David Anglin
20:05 Re: GCC 3.1 Prerelease Mark Mitchell
19:04 RE: GCC 3.1 Prerelease Billinghurst, David (CRTS)
18:46 Re: GCC 3.1 Prerelease David S. Miller
18:41 Re: v8.S dwarf2 eh frame issues again :( David S. Miller
18:13 Re: v8.S dwarf2 eh frame issues again :( David S. Miller
17:57 GCC performance regression - up to 20% ? Michel LESPINASSE
17:28 Re: GCC 3.1 Prerelease Mark Mitchell
17:17 Re: GCC 3.1 Prerelease Mark Mitchell
17:16 Re: GCC 3.1 Prerelease Mark Mitchell
16:35 Re: GCC 3.1 Prerelease Peter Schmid
16:17 Re: GCC 3.1 Prerelease Tom Tromey
16:10 Results for g++ 3.1 application testing on i686-pc-linux-gnu Peter Schmid
14:44 Re: GCC 3.1 Prerelease Joel Sherrill
14:36 USED FORMWORK MANTO HUENNEBECK Manto
14:07 Re: GCC 3.1 Prerelease Jakub Jelinek
13:59 Re: GCC 3.1 Prerelease Mark Mitchell
13:56 Re: GCC 3.1 Prerelease Mark Mitchell
13:51 Re: GCC 3.1 Prerelease Joseph S. Myers
13:50 Re: GCC 3.1 Prerelease Stan Shebs
13:39 Re: v8.S dwarf2 eh frame issues again :( Jeff Sturm
13:08 Conduct Education in the 21st Century Dr. Carter
13:08 Conduct Education in the 21st Century Dr. Carter
12:48 GCC 3.1 Prerelease Mark Mitchell
11:46 Re: [Ada] [3.1] Bug reporting Joel Sherrill
10:32 Re: inline asm string/line break rules change Joel Sherrill
10:30 [Ada] [3.1] Bug reporting Florian Weimer
09:43 Re: 3.1 release blockers? Robert Dewar
09:28 3.1 release blockers? Stan Shebs
08:29 Re: "Branch" vs "mainline" ? [was Re: Ada bugs] Daniel Jacobowitz
08:28 Re: v8.S dwarf2 eh frame issues again :( Richard Smith
07:50 gcc 2.95.x interesting c++ parser error (bug). Karel Gardas
07:50 "Branch" vs "mainline" ? [was Re: Ada bugs] gnat-dev
06:39 Re: Warning: gcc (3.1 branch) is broken for target i686-pc-mingw32 Gerald Pfeifer
06:05 Warning: gcc (3.1 branch) is broken for target i686-pc-mingw32 megacz
05:53 Sending to gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org results in error Craig Rodrigues
03:52 Re: http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-3.1/changes.html Gerald Pfeifer
02:54 Re: AST-Optimizer and De-Parse James Michael DuPont
00:17 Re: Pretty good gcc-3.1 on sparc32-linux Christian Jönsson
00:08 Re: v8.S dwarf2 eh frame issues again :( Jakub Jelinek

April 19, 2002
19:32 v8.S dwarf2 eh frame issues again :( David S. Miller
16:58 Re: gcc preprocessor testing mike stump
16:58 Re: DFA scheduler for i386.md Jan Hubicka
16:11 Re: DFA scheduler for i386.md David S. Miller
16:08 Re: DFA scheduler for i386.md David S. Miller
16:04 Re: DFA scheduler for i386.md David S. Miller
15:53 Re: DFA scheduler for i386.md Vladimir Makarov
15:17 Re: DFA scheduler for i386.md Jan Hubicka
15:14 Re: DFA scheduler for i386.md Jan Hubicka
15:08 Re: DFA scheduler for i386.md Jan Hubicka
15:05 gcc preprocessor testing Kintali Shiva Prasad
14:34 Re: rel_ops (was Re: GCC 3.1 Release) Joe Buck
14:25 Re: rel_ops (was Re: GCC 3.1 Release) Phil Edwards
13:19 Re: AIX gcc compiler memory management Boehne, Robert
12:59 Re: rel_ops (was Re: GCC 3.1 Release) Gabriel Dos Reis
12:54 Re: rel_ops (was Re: GCC 3.1 Release) Gabriel Dos Reis
12:47 Re: rel_ops (was Re: GCC 3.1 Release) Gabriel Dos Reis
12:46 Re: rel_ops (was Re: GCC 3.1 Release) Gabriel Dos Reis
12:36 Re: patch/proposal: obsolete configurations in 3.1 Hans-Peter Nilsson
12:36 Re: patch/proposal: obsolete configurations in 3.1 Hans-Peter Nilsson
11:56 Re: mh-sun3 removal - sun3s still in use DJ Delorie
11:50 mh-sun3 removal - sun3s still in use tm
10:59 Problem with forward declaration within a namespace... Thomas J Amato
10:52 Re: Adding HURD/Alpha configuration to build? Richard Henderson
10:42 Re: Adding HURD/Alpha configuration to build? Andrew M. Miklic
10:39 Re: http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-3.1/changes.html Tom Tromey
10:32 Re: Adding HURD/Alpha configuration to build? Richard Henderson
10:30 Re: DFA scheduler for i386.md Richard Henderson
10:24 Re: [gcc_release] Patch for FSF TZ=UTC0 recommendation Mark Mitchell
10:23 Re: DFA scheduler for i386.md law
10:14 Fwd: Make bootstrap error Arthur DeHaney
09:47 Re: Add warning Joe Buck
09:44 Re: gcc with binutils-2.11.2 on solaris Gerald Pfeifer
09:27 Re: DFA scheduler for i386.md Vladimir Makarov
09:20 Re: Pretty good gcc-3.1 on sparc32-linux Christian Jönsson
09:09 Re: Illegal instruction on sparc32-linux Thorsten Kukuk
09:08 Re: DFA scheduler for i386.md law
09:03 Re: http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-3.1/changes.html Gerald Pfeifer
08:55 Re: Illegal instruction on sparc32-linux David S. Miller
08:50 Re: DFA scheduler for i386.md Vladimir Makarov
08:27 STACK_REGS macros ilaria meccoli
08:16 Re: http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-3.1/changes.html kelley.r.cook
07:47 Add warning Neal D. Becker
07:26 Re: http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-3.1/changes.html Joseph S. Myers
07:20 Adding HURD/Alpha configuration to build? Andrew M. Miklic
07:19 -fdump-translation-unit OPTION Jaswant
06:40 NECESITAMOS PERSONAS EMPRENDEDORAS coupmoney
04:52 Re: ATTRIBUTE_WEAK not working in crtstuff.c? Franz Sirl
04:45 Attention GCJ devel team James Williams
04:10 Re: Illegal instruction on sparc32-linux Thorsten Kukuk
03:40 Re: http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-3.1/changes.html Robert Dewar
03:24 Re: Illegal instruction on sparc32-linux David S. Miller
03:19 Re: GCC 3.1 Hans-Peter Nilsson
03:05 Re: GCC 3.1 Paolo Carlini
03:03 Re: GCC 3.1 Jakub Jelinek
02:57 DFA scheduler for i386.md Jan Hubicka
02:51 Re: GCC 3.1 David Rasmussen
02:47 Re: Illegal instruction on sparc32-linux Thorsten Kukuk
02:33 Produce more simple assembler output Ben. K.
02:32 Re: GCC 3.1 Gerald Pfeifer
02:21 GCC 3.1 David Rasmussen
00:54 PATCH for Re: http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-3.1/changes.html Gerald Pfeifer
00:42 Successful gcc-3.0.4 build Alexis Scheuer
00:41 Re: http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-3.1/changes.html Toon Moene
00:25 http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-3.1/changes.html Gerald Pfeifer

April 18, 2002
23:45 Re: Obsolete configurations, round 3 jpd
22:22 Re: ATTRIBUTE_WEAK not working in crtstuff.c? Alan Modra
17:32 Re: Pretty good gcc-3.1 on sparc32-linux Hans-Peter Nilsson
17:06 Re: optimizing % CONST_INT Richard Henderson
16:49 Re: optimizing % CONST_INT David S. Miller
16:08 Re: gcc with binutils-2.11.2 on solaris Dan Nicolaescu
16:00 Trouble building gcc-3.0.4 on hp/ux Peter Barada
15:57 Fwd: [Introspector-developers] Example SQL and XML of DOTGNU/CSCC/csnodes.c James Michael DuPont
15:40 Re: documentation for operand constraints/patterns? David Mosberger
15:36 Re: [RFA] BRANCH_COST (was Re: optimizing % CONST_INT) Richard Henderson
15:24 [RFA] BRANCH_COST (was Re: optimizing % CONST_INT) David S. Miller
14:56 Re: Questions about peephole2 Joe Buck
14:51 Re: documentation for operand constraints/patterns? Steve Christiansen
14:49 Re: Illegal instruction on sparc32-linux David S. Miller
13:39 Re: ATTRIBUTE_WEAK not working in crtstuff.c? Richard Henderson
13:36 Re: ATTRIBUTE_WEAK not working in crtstuff.c? Franz Sirl
13:34 Re: ia64 abi vs variable sized data types Richard Henderson
13:32 Re: gcc with binutils-2.11.2 on solaris Dan Nicolaescu
13:25 Re: Illegal instruction on sparc32-linux Christian Jönsson
13:18 Re: Questions about peephole2 Peter Barada
13:18 Re: Pretty good gcc-3.1 on sparc32-linux Christian Jönsson
13:11 Illegal instruction on sparc32-linux Thorsten Kukuk
13:04 Re: Questions about peephole2 Richard Henderson
13:02 Re: Pretty good gcc-3.1 on sparc32-linux Richard Henderson
12:57 Re: Pretty good gcc-3.1 on sparc32-linux Ulrich Weigand
12:02 Re: Current state of MIPS16 support? Eric Christopher
12:01 Re: Questions about peephole2 Peter Barada
11:59 Re: Pretty good gcc-3.1 on sparc32-linux Hans-Peter Nilsson
11:58 Re: fold-const.c GCC 3.2 bootstrap failure Jakub Jelinek
11:55 fold-const.c GCC 3.2 bootstrap failure David Edelsohn
11:48 Re: Anoncvs via SSH (was: Questions about peephole2) Christian Jönsson
11:44 Re: Pretty good gcc-3.1 on sparc32-linux Christian Jönsson
11:40 Re: Pretty good gcc-3.1 on sparc32-linux Christian Jönsson
11:39 Anoncvs via SSH (was: Questions about peephole2) Gerald Pfeifer
11:26 Re: Obsolete configurations, round 3 Eric Christopher
10:57 [gcc_release] Patch for FSF TZ=UTC0 recommendation kelley.r.cook
10:52 Re: Pretty good gcc-3.1 on sparc32-linux Richard Henderson
10:44 Re: ATTRIBUTE_WEAK not working in crtstuff.c? Richard Henderson
10:13 Re: Pretty good gcc-3.1 on sparc32-linux Joe Buck
10:13 Re: Questions about peephole2 Richard Henderson
10:00 Re: patch/proposal: obsolete configurations in 3.1 Paul Koning
09:50 Re: Intermediate code dump needed. Ashish Gupta
09:43 Re: Questions about peephole2 Peter Barada
09:29 Pretty good gcc-3.1 on sparc32-linux Christian Jönsson
09:11 Re: patch/proposal: obsolete configurations in 3.1 Kai Henningsen
07:47 RE: Intermediate code dump needed. Naveen Sharma, Noida
07:40 Re: 3.1 bootstrap warnings on powerpc-apple-darwin5.4 David Edelsohn
07:36 Intermediate code dump needed. Jaswant
07:22 Your message to Sdcc-user awaits moderator approval sdcc-user-admin
06:56 structure fields/access profiling Parity Error
05:08 Special assembler local variables declaration format Alexandre Courbot
05:05 Re: Current state of MIPS16 support? Johannes Stezenbach
03:55 Re: gcc with binutils-2.11.2 on solaris Gerald Pfeifer
03:43 Re: Obsolete configurations, round 3 Andi Kleen
02:50 Re: Macro causes an error Richard Earnshaw
02:24 Re: multilibs produce incompatible libgcc_s Jakub Jelinek
02:20 Re: gcc with binutils-2.11.2 on solaris Manfred Hollstein
02:19 multilibs produce incompatible libgcc_s Andreas Jaeger
02:07 gcc with binutils-2.11.2 on solaris Dan Nicolaescu
01:29 Re: ATTRIBUTE_WEAK not working in crtstuff.c? Franz Sirl
00:57 Re: optimizing % CONST_INT David S. Miller
00:52 Re: ATTRIBUTE_WEAK not working in crtstuff.c? Alan Modra
00:23 Re: problems with 3.1: sparc64-sun-solaris2.8 Richard Henderson

April 17, 2002
23:59 Re: optimizing % CONST_INT Richard Henderson
23:45 Re: gcc 3.2 CVS + newlib CVS status report Eric Christopher
21:48 problems with 3.1: sparc64-sun-solaris2.8 Mark Benvenuto
21:26 Re: AIX gcc compiler memory management Ana Yuseepi
21:24 3.1 bootstrap warnings on powerpc-apple-darwin5.4 Brad Lucier
21:12 testsuite and alpha OSF/1 4.0 ... Gareth Pearce
20:26 Macro causes an error Ben. K.
19:16 Re: patch/proposal: obsolete configurations in 3.1 Phil Edwards
19:10 Re: AIX gcc compiler memory management David Edelsohn
18:35 Re: patch/proposal: obsolete configurations in 3.1 DJ Delorie
18:28 Re: optimizing % CONST_INT Dan Nicolaescu
18:13 Re: AIX gcc compiler memory management Ana Yuseepi
18:04 Re: patch/proposal: obsolete configurations in 3.1 Zack Weinberg
17:49 ATTRIBUTE_WEAK not working in crtstuff.c? Raja R Harinath
17:26 Re: optimizing % CONST_INT Richard Henderson
17:16 Re: Questions about peephole2 Richard Henderson
16:54 optimizing % CONST_INT Dan Nicolaescu
16:36 Re: rel_ops (was Re: GCC 3.1 Release) Joe Buck
15:45 Re: Current state of MIPS16 support? Eric Christopher
15:36 Re: gcc 3.2 CVS + newlib CVS status report Hans-Peter Nilsson
15:00 Re: Ada bugs Robert Dewar
14:28 Re: ICEs on X86/Linux with SPECjbb Adam King
14:21 Re: gcc 3.2 CVS + newlib CVS status report Joel Sherrill
14:17 Re: Ada bugs Florian Weimer
14:16 Re: gcc 3.2 CVS + newlib CVS status report Joe Buck
14:12 ICEs on X86/Linux with SPECjbb Boehm, Hans
13:24 Questions about peephole2 Peter Barada
12:35 Re: Suggestion for function attributes on x86 architecture Richard Henderson
12:34 Re: Obsolete configurations, round 3 Zack Weinberg
12:32 Re: Obsolete configurations, round 3 Eric Christopher
12:28 Re: Obsolete configurations, round 3 Joel Sherrill
12:16 Re: Obsolete configurations, round 3 Eric Christopher
12:15 Re: rel_ops (was Re: GCC 3.1 Release) Phil Edwards
12:03 Re: rel_ops (was Re: GCC 3.1 Release) Joe Buck
12:01 Re: Obsolete configurations, round 3 Zack Weinberg
11:56 Re: Obsolete configurations, round 3 Zack Weinberg
11:53 Re: rel_ops (was Re: GCC 3.1 Release) Richard B. Kreckel
11:52 Re: Ada bugs Robert Dewar
11:45 Re: bootstrap failure: 3.1 branch, sparc-sun-solaris2.7 Joe Buck
11:39 Re: Suggestion for function attributes on x86 architecture Ben. K.
11:36 Re: Ada bugs Joseph S. Myers
11:32 Re: Ada bugs Robert Dewar
11:25 Re: Suggestion for function attributes on x86 architecture Robert Dewar
11:20 Re: Ada bugs Joseph S. Myers
11:12 Re: Suggestion for function attributes on x86 architecture Robert Dewar
11:11 Re: Suggestion for function attributes on x86 architecture Robert Dewar
10:53 RE: Obsolete configurations, round 3 Eric Christopher
10:50 Re: Suggestion for function attributes on x86 architecture Geoff Keating
10:45 Re: Suggestion for function attributes on x86 architecture Ben. K.
10:37 Re: DFA scheduler buglet law
10:32 Re: flow2 reordering blocks whcih could be left inline Richard Henderson
10:31 Re: Suggestion for function attributes on x86 architecture Richard Earnshaw
10:28 Re: Suggestion for function attributes on x86 architecture Richard Henderson
10:26 gcc 3.2 CVS + newlib CVS status report Joel Sherrill
10:25 Re: Suggestion for function attributes on x86 architecture Robert Dewar
10:16 Re: Suggestion for function attributes on x86 architecture Richard Earnshaw
10:13 Re: DFA scheduler buglet Vladimir Makarov
09:55 Re: DFA scheduler buglet law
09:54 Re: Ada bugs Robert Dewar
09:48 Re: flow2 reordering blocks whcih could be left inline Peter Barada
09:44 Re: Suggestion for function attributes on x86 architecture Ben. K.
09:43 Re: Suggestion for function attributes on x86 architecture Ben. K.
09:43 Re: Ada bugs Mark Mitchell
09:36 Re: G++ PATCH for label-handling Joe Buck
09:31 Re: Suggestion for function attributes on x86 architecture Richard Henderson
09:28 Re: Suggestion for function attributes on x86 architecture Joe Buck
09:22 Re: Suggestion for function attributes on x86 architecture Richard Henderson
09:04 Re: DFA scheduler buglet Vladimir Makarov
08:16 DFA scheduler buglet law
08:04 Current state of MIPS16 support? Johannes Stezenbach
08:02 RE: Obsolete configurations, round 3 Dana, Eric
07:56 Suggestion for function attributes on x86 architecture Ben. K.
07:47 Re: AIX gcc compiler memory management David Edelsohn
07:38 Re: GCC / FreeBSD 4.5-STABLE Daniel Jacobowitz
06:43 Re: Obsolete configurations, round 3 Gerald Pfeifer
04:50 PR5903 Robert Dewar
04:44 Re: Ada bugs Robert Dewar
04:24 Re: Ada bugs Robert Dewar
04:22 Re: Ada bugs Robert Dewar
03:26 Re: G++ PATCH for label-handling Grammatikakis Miltiadis
03:24 G++ PATCH for label-handling Grammatikakis Miltiadis
02:54 Re: Ada bugs Florian Weimer
02:08 Re: GCC 3.1 Release Andreas Schwab
02:02 Re: GCC 3.1 Release Gerald Pfeifer
01:55 Re: GCC / FreeBSD 4.5-STABLE xfesty
01:53 Re: informations on Redhat 7.1 and Official GCC releases Gerald Pfeifer
01:48 informations on Redhat 7.1 and Official GCC releases Francesco Lanni
01:48 Re: problem building Mondays snapshot on solaris 2.8 system Gerald Pfeifer
01:45 Re: GCC / FreeBSD 4.5-STABLE Gerald Pfeifer
01:19 AIX gcc compiler memory management Ana Yuseepi

April 16, 2002
22:40 GCC / FreeBSD 4.5-STABLE xfesty
21:19 Re: patch/proposal: obsolete configurations in 3.1 David O'Brien
20:45 Re: Obsolete configurations, round 3 Eric Christopher
18:59 Re: Ada bugs Robert Dewar
18:54 Ada bugs Mark Mitchell
17:15 problem building Mondays snapshot on solaris 2.8 system George.R.Goffe
17:06 Re: Obsolete configurations, round 3 Marc Espie
17:00 Re: GCC 3.1 Release Marc Espie
16:52 Re: GCC 3.1 Release Marc Espie
16:29 Re: bootstrap failure: 3.1 branch, sparc-sun-solaris2.7 Richard Henderson
16:27 Re: bootstrap failure: 3.1 branch, sparc-sun-solaris2.7 David S. Miller
16:19 bootstrap failure: 3.1 branch, sparc-sun-solaris2.7 Joe Buck
15:29 Re: Obsolete configurations, round 3 Jason R Thorpe
15:27 Re: Obsolete configurations, round 3 Jason R Thorpe
15:25 Re: Obsolete configurations, round 3 Jason R Thorpe
15:23 Re: gcc-64 on HP-UX 11.00 John David Anglin
15:16 Re: GCC 3.1 Release H . J . Lu
15:09 Re: GCC 3.1 Release mark
15:04 load_mems hoists parts of libcalls - what is the intended interface of cselib? Joern Rennecke
13:54 Re: Propose PR 6160 as high priority Florian Weimer
13:17 Re: Obsolete configurations, round 3 Richard Kenner
13:15 Re: Obsolete configurations, round 3 Miod Vallat
13:14 Re: inline asm string/line break rules change Joel Sherrill
13:13 Re: gcc-64 on HP-UX 11.00 law
13:09 Re: inline asm string/line break rules change Jim Wilson
13:08 Re: Obsolete configurations, round 3 jpd
13:01 Re: Obsolete configurations, round 3 law
12:57 Re: Obsolete configurations, round 3 Richard Henderson
12:26 RE: patch/proposal: obsolete configurations in 3.1 Dana, Eric
12:13 Re: more obsolete configurations Neil Booth
12:06 Re: Obsolete configurations, round 3 Jim Mercer
11:30 Re: Obsolete configurations, round 3 Zack Weinberg
11:25 Re: Obsolete configurations, round 3 David S. Miller
11:25 Re: Obsolete configurations, round 3 Zack Weinberg
11:23 Re: Obsolete configurations, round 3 Zack Weinberg
11:22 Re: How to build on sparcv9-sun-solaris2.8? David S. Miller
11:17 Re: How to build on sparcv9-sun-solaris2.8? David S. Miller
11:12 Re: How to build on sparcv9-sun-solaris2.8? Brad Lucier
11:05 Re: Obsolete configurations, round 3 Zack Weinberg
10:53 Re: rel_ops (was Re: GCC 3.1 Release) Mark Mitchell
10:49 Re: rel_ops (was Re: GCC 3.1 Release) Gabriel Dos Reis
10:46 Re: rel_ops (was Re: GCC 3.1 Release) Gabriel Dos Reis
10:44 Re: Obsolete configurations, round 3 Joel Sherrill
10:38 Re: Obsolete configurations, round 3 David Edelsohn
10:35 Re: 3.1 C++ Compile Issue - w/Preprocessed File Gabriel Dos Reis
10:34 Re: rel_ops (was Re: GCC 3.1 Release) Joe Buck
10:28 Re: How to build on sparcv9-sun-solaris2.8? Richard Henderson
10:21 Re: Obsolete configurations, round 3 Richard Henderson
10:15 How to build on sparcv9-sun-solaris2.8? Brad Lucier
10:15 Re: Obsolete configurations, round 3 Lars Brinkhoff
10:09 Re: Obsolete configurations, round 3 Richard Kenner
10:04 Obsolete configurations, round 3 Zack Weinberg
10:04 Re: rel_ops (was Re: GCC 3.1 Release) Mark Mitchell
09:59 Partial Regs D. Towner
09:49 Re: patch/proposal: obsolete configurations in 3.1 Kaveh R. Ghazi
09:47 rel_ops (was Re: GCC 3.1 Release) Joe Buck
09:45 Re: more obsolete configurations Joel Sherrill
09:39 Re: more obsolete configurations Zack Weinberg
09:39 RE: patch/proposal: obsolete configurations in 3.1 Michael Matz
09:35 Re: patch/proposal: obsolete configurations in 3.1 Zack Weinberg
09:27 Re: more obsolete configurations Joel Sherrill
09:21 Re: Ready to volunteer - Enhancement in GCC for H8300 Kazu Hirata
09:20 Re: patch/proposal: obsolete configurations in 3.1 'Zack Weinberg'
08:58 Re: Bug in configure.in David S. Miller
08:47 Re: Bug in configure.in Tom Tromey
08:46 Re: more obsolete configurations Zack Weinberg
08:38 RE: patch/proposal: obsolete configurations in 3.1 Dana, Eric
07:38 Re: 3.1 C++ Compile Issue - w/Preprocessed File Phil Edwards
07:22 RE: 3.1 C++ Compile Issue - w/Preprocessed File Chip Cuntz
07:08 Re: patch/proposal: obsolete configurations in 3.1 Joel Sherrill
07:02 Re: patch/proposal: obsolete configurations in 3.1 Paul Koning
07:01 Bug in configure.in Martin Kahlert
06:51 Re: patch/proposal: obsolete configurations in 3.1 Paul Koning
06:30 more obsolete configurations Joel Sherrill
06:08 Re: patch/proposal: obsolete configurations in 3.1 Nick Burrett
04:32 Re: patch/proposal: obsolete configurations in 3.1 Phil Edwards
03:59 Re: patch/proposal: obsolete configurations in 3.1 Joel Sherrill
03:41 Re: remaining libjava/verify_local_live_at_start failures Jan Hubicka
03:32 Re: patch/proposal: obsolete configurations in 3.1 Richard Earnshaw
03:22 Re: GCC release 3.1 question David S. Miller
03:06 GCC release 3.1 question glebourgeois
02:37 gcc-2.95.3 on tru64 5.1A Juergen Zahrer
00:46 Re: patch/proposal: obsolete configurations in 3.1 Hans-Peter Nilsson
00:44 SALVI contro RICCI contro ricci

April 15, 2002
23:56 Re: patch/proposal: obsolete configurations in 3.1 Douglas B. Rupp
23:47 Re: Automated Regression Testing Jason Molenda
23:24 Re: Automated Regression Testing Hans-Peter Nilsson
23:06 Re: patch/proposal: obsolete configurations in 3.1 Neil Booth
20:09 Re: patch/proposal: obsolete configurations in 3.1 DJ Delorie
20:08 Re: remaining libjava/verify_local_live_at_start failures Richard Henderson
20:03 Re: patch/proposal: obsolete configurations in 3.1 Phil Edwards
19:57 Re: GCC 3.1 Release Gabriel Dos Reis
19:46 Re: remaining libjava/verify_local_live_at_start failures Hans-Peter Nilsson
19:43 Re: patch/proposal: obsolete configurations in 3.1 DJ Delorie
19:41 Re: GCC 3.1 Release Mark Mitchell
19:36 Customised Cross Compiler julia koh
19:31 Re: GCC 3.1 Release Gabriel Dos Reis
19:10 Re: patch/proposal: obsolete configurations in 3.1 Phil Edwards
18:54 Re: todays snapshot Daniel Jacobowitz
18:53 gcc-ss-20020415 is now available gccadmin
18:50 todays snapshot George.R.Goffe
18:02 Re: patch/proposal: obsolete configurations in 3.1 Stan Shebs
17:51 Re: GCC 3.1 Release David Edelsohn
17:50 Re: GCC 3.1 Release Gabriel Dos Reis
17:43 gcc 3.0.4 Redhat 7.2 success Ketal Patel
17:34 Re: patch/proposal: obsolete configurations in 3.1 Stan Shebs
17:19 Re: Question about C++ and type aliasing Jamie Lokier
17:16 Re: GCC 3.1 Release David O'Brien
17:07 Re: documentation for operand constraints/patterns? Richard Henderson
16:52 Re: patch/proposal: obsolete configurations in 3.1 David O'Brien
16:49 Re: Automated Regression Testing Tim Hollebeek
16:49 Re: patch/proposal: obsolete configurations in 3.1 Richard Henderson
16:37 documentation for operand constraints/patterns? David Mosberger
16:33 RE: Automated Regression Testing Billinghurst, David (CRTS)
16:27 Re: Automated Regression Testing Diego Novillo
16:16 Re: Automated Regression Testing Joe Buck
15:45 Automated Regression Testing Bruce Korb
15:39 Re: 3.1 C++ Compile Issue - w/Preprocessed File Gabriel Dos Reis
15:06 Re: Question about C++ and type aliasing Dan Nicolaescu
15:01 Re: GCC 3.1 Release Richard Kenner
14:52 Re: GCC 3.1 Release Mark Mitchell
14:40 Re: GCC 3.1 Release Geoff Keating
13:54 Re: unrecognizable insn (with ccppc compiler) mike stump
13:43 Re: 3.1 C++ Compile Issue - w/Preprocessed File David Edelsohn
13:39 Re: Propose PR 6160 as high priority Robert Dewar
13:27 Re: gcc-64 on HP-UX 11.00 John David Anglin
13:25 Re: Propose PR 6160 as high priority Joseph S. Myers
13:23 Re: -R gcc option? Tom Tromey
13:13 Re: patch/proposal: obsolete configurations in 3.1 Mark Mitchell
13:03 Re: GCC 3.1 Release Geoff Keating
12:59 Re: patch/proposal: obsolete configurations in 3.1 Robert Dewar
12:50 Re: patch/proposal: obsolete configurations in 3.1 mike stump
12:47 Re: patch/proposal: obsolete configurations in 3.1 mike stump
12:46 Re: patch/proposal: obsolete configurations in 3.1 Janis Johnson
12:31 Question about C++ and type aliasing Jamie Lokier
12:22 Re: Propose PR 6160 as high priority Robert Dewar
12:21 Re: GCC 3.1 Release Mark Mitchell
12:13 Re: patch/proposal: obsolete configurations in 3.1 Hans-Peter Nilsson
12:13 Re: GCC 3.1 Release Michael Matz
12:01 3.1 C++ Compile Issue - w/Preprocessed File Chip Cuntz
12:00 Re: GCC 3.1 Release Mark Mitchell
11:56 Re: GCC 3.1 Release Andreas Jaeger
11:49 Re: patch/proposal: obsolete configurations in 3.1 Hans-Peter Nilsson
11:42 Re: suspect assembly code for gcc 2.95.3 for ppc Franz Sirl
11:37 Re: gcc-64 on HP-UX 11.00 John David Anglin
11:36 Re: GCC 3.1 Release Joe Buck
11:27 Re: GCC 3.1 Release Andreas Jaeger
11:19 Re: Propose PR 6160 as high priority Richard Kenner
11:04 Re: GCC 3.1 Release H . J . Lu
10:56 Re: Propose PR 6160 as high priority Brad Lucier
10:50 Re: GCC 3.1 Release Geoff Keating
10:45 3.1 C++ Compile Issue Chip Cuntz
10:42 Re: patch/proposal: obsolete configurations in 3.1 Daniel Egger
10:34 Re: patch/proposal: obsolete configurations in 3.1 Mark Mitchell
10:27 Re: [AST-optimizer-branch] Double chaining statements (proposal) Sebastian Pop
10:06 Re: [AST-optimizer-branch] Double chaining statements (proposal) Daniel Berlin
10:05 Re: patch/proposal: obsolete configurations in 3.1 Zack Weinberg
09:53 Re: gcc-64 on HP-UX 11.00 law
09:50 Re: address error Nick Ing-Simmons
09:46 [AST-optimizer-branch] Double chaining statements (proposal) Sebastian Pop
09:46 Re: gcc-64 on HP-UX 11.00 John David Anglin
09:32 Software workaround for buggy MIPS CPU Kris Warkentin
09:28 Re: Successfule build: gcc-3.0.4, C and C++ Janis Johnson
09:16 Re: patch/proposal: obsolete configurations in 3.1 Richard Kenner
08:45 address error Miguel Figueiredo
08:33 Re: gcc-64 on HP-UX 11.00 law
08:20 Re: patch/proposal: obsolete configurations in 3.1 Alan Lehotsky
08:16 Re: patch/proposal: obsolete configurations in 3.1 Lars Brinkhoff
08:13 Re: patch/proposal: obsolete configurations in 3.1 Mark Mitchell
08:07 Re: patch/proposal: obsolete configurations in 3.1 Robert Dewar
08:05 Re: patch/proposal: obsolete configurations in 3.1 David S. Miller
07:53 Re: inline asm string/line break rules change Joel Sherrill
07:46 RE: suspect assembly code for gcc 2.95.3 for ppc Bob Boz
07:25 Re: patch/proposal: obsolete configurations in 3.1 Mark Mitchell
07:17 possibilty of -Wcast-precision-loss? Gareth Pearce
06:35 Re: C++ Questions... Robert Lipe
05:38 Re: patch/proposal: obsolete configurations in 3.1 Paul Koning
04:33 partial_nregs problem. D. Towner
02:22 Ready to volunteer - Enhancement in GCC for H8300 Anita Kulkarni
01:38 [3.1 branch] Ada installation problems Matthias Klose
01:21 Re: are there known problems developing on MacOS X Aldy Hernandez
00:31 Re: patch/proposal: obsolete configurations in 3.1 Andi Kleen

April 14, 2002
23:24 Re: patch/proposal: obsolete configurations in 3.1 Zack Weinberg
23:23 Re: patch/proposal: obsolete configurations in 3.1 Zack Weinberg
18:47 Re: inline asm string/line break rules change Zack Weinberg
18:15 Re: inline asm string/line break rules change Joel Sherrill
17:46 Re: inline asm string/line break rules change Jamie Lokier
17:04 Inlining string functions Wirawan Purwanto
15:29 Re: GCC 3.1 Release David Edelsohn
15:18 Re: patch/proposal: obsolete configurations in 3.1 Kevin Handy
10:34 Re: patch/proposal: obsolete configurations in 3.1 Andi Kleen
08:16 Re: GCC 3.1 Release Robert Dewar
07:25 Re: GCC 3.1 Release Jason Merrill
07:18 Re: GCC 3.1 Release Andreas Jaeger
07:03 Re: inline asm string/line break rules change Joel Sherrill
06:59 Successfule build: gcc-3.0.4, C and C++ Jan Gerritsen
06:06 Re: GCC 3.1 Release Jason Merrill
06:04 Re: [Again] 3.1-branch build problem Christian Thalinger
02:52 Re: inline asm string/line break rules change Andi Kleen
02:47 Re: inline asm string/line break rules change Tim Hollebeek
02:24 Re: inline asm string/line break rules change David S. Miller
01:46 Re: inline asm string/line break rules change Andi Kleen
01:33 Re: inline asm string/line break rules change Andi Kleen

April 13, 2002
23:27 Re: GCC 3.1 Release H . J . Lu
23:07 Re: inline asm string/line break rules change Tim Hollebeek
22:36 Re: GCC 3.1 Release Bryce McKinlay
20:21 Re: inline asm string/line break rules change David S. Miller
15:14 RE: PR6212 Mark Mitchell
15:09 C++ Questions... Owen R. Coon and Stephanie Coo
14:56 Re: inline asm string/line break rules change Andi Kleen
14:53 RE: PR6212 Billinghurst, David (CRTS)
14:52 Re: Money_members do not XPASS anymore on power-linux? Franz Sirl
14:29 Re: Money_members do not XPASS anymore on power-linux? Mark Mitchell
14:25 Re: Money_members do not XPASS anymore on power-linux? Paolo Carlini
14:24 Re: Does gcc 3.0 support P4 instruction code? Jan Hubicka
14:02 Re: inline asm string/line break rules change Franz Sirl
13:51 Re: Money_members do not XPASS anymore on power-linux? Franz Sirl
13:18 Re: GCC 3.1 Release Robert Dewar
13:05 Re: GCC 3.1 Release Tom Tromey
12:59 Successful build of gcc 3.0.4 arm-elf on Cygwin 1.3.10 =?utf-8?Q?alberto.perotti@libe
12:31 Re: inline asm string/line break rules change Andi Kleen
12:00 Re: sparc-elf - why is v8 multilib disabled? Richard Henderson
11:57 Re: [Again] 3.1-branch build problem Mark Mitchell
11:40 inline asm string/line break rules change Joel Sherrill
11:23 Re: PR6212 Mark Mitchell
11:23 Re: Money_members do not XPASS anymore on power-linux? Mark Mitchell
10:40 Re: sparc-elf - why is v8 multilib disabled? Joel Sherrill
09:03 Re: gcc-64 on HP-UX 11.00 John David Anglin
08:40 Re: Documentation problem: Cannot build gcc 3.1 info files Joseph S. Myers
08:30 Re: GCC 3.1 Release Tim Prince
08:07 Re: Broken links on web pages Toon Moene
07:50 Broken links on web pages Erik Schnetter
05:25 Re: GCC 3.1 Release Toon Moene
05:02 Re: Documentation problem: Cannot build gcc 3.1 info files Craig Rodrigues
04:57 Money_members do not XPASS anymore on power-linux? Paolo Carlini
04:06 Re: PR6212 Richard Kenner
03:01 Does gcc 3.0 support P4 instruction code? Chen Keping
02:21 Re: problems with powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu Alan Modra
02:18 Re: GCC 3.1 Release Neil Booth
02:06 Re: Documentation problem: Cannot build gcc 3.1 info files Joseph S. Myers

April 12, 2002
22:54 Re: problems with powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu Janis Johnson
20:02 Re: Documentation problem: Cannot build gcc 3.1 info files Craig Rodrigues
19:46 Documentation problem: Cannot build gcc 3.1 info files Craig Rodrigues
19:08 Re: problems with powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu David Edelsohn
19:02 PR6212 Mark Mitchell
18:52 problems with powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu Janis Johnson
18:51 [the -R thing] Phil Edwards
18:20 GCC 3.1 Release Mark Mitchell
16:48 Re: Fixing libstdc++/3628 (was: Re: GCC 3.1 Release) Paolo Carlini
16:10 Re: [Again] 3.1-branch build problem DJ Delorie
15:26 Re: Fixing libstdc++/3628 (was: Re: GCC 3.1 Release) Mark Mitchell
15:18 Re: [Again] 3.1-branch build problem Loren James Rittle
15:15 unrecognizable insn (with ccppc compiler) Shah Amit-ASHAH3
13:49 Re: contribution Toon Moene
11:47 Re: sparc-elf - why is v8 multilib disabled? Richard Henderson
11:43 PATCH for Re: DLX support as gcc-extension/museum Gerald Pfeifer
11:42 Re: 3.0.4 cross build fails on i686-pc Richard Henderson
10:55 Re: contribution Alexey Starovoytov
10:32 Re: -R gcc option? Phil Edwards
10:23 Re: [Again] 3.1-branch build problem Gerald Pfeifer
10:22 Re: gcc.dg/cpp/charconst.c vs. WCHAR_TYPE "long int" Neil Booth
10:12 Re: gcc.dg/cpp/charconst.c vs. WCHAR_TYPE "long int" Franz Sirl
10:01 Re: Incorrect declaration parsing in gcc 3.0.3? Neil Booth
09:44 Re: suspect assembly code for gcc 2.95.3 for ppc Franz Sirl
09:34 Re: .n suffixes for function names in stabs debug info (GCC 3.1-based compiler) Daniel Jacobowitz
09:23 Re: gcc-64 on HP-UX 11.00 John David Anglin
09:06 Re: [Again] 3.1-branch build problem Andreas Jaeger
06:37 profiling appears to be broken. Jan Hubicka
05:58 sparc-elf - why is v8 multilib disabled? Joel Sherrill
05:54 Re: contribution Toon Moene
05:45 Re: contribution Andi Kleen
05:35 Re: contribution Toon Moene
05:21 Re: [C++ PATCH] Fix PR c++/5373 Jakub Jelinek
05:12 Re: [C++ PATCH] Fix PR c++/5373 Andreas Schwab
05:08 Re: GCC 3.1 Release Paolo Carlini
04:39 Re: gcc-64 on HP-UX 11.00 H.Merijn Brand
04:33 Re: gcc-64 on HP-UX 11.00 H.Merijn Brand
03:52 [Again] 3.1-branch build problem Christian Thalinger
03:19 3.0.4 cross build fails on i686-pc ackek
02:45 Re: gcc-64 on HP-UX 11.00 H.Merijn Brand
01:48 Re: CFG-branch merge (Was: Re: DFA scheduler merge - approval issues?) Jan Hubicka
01:28 Re: .n suffixes for function names in stabs debug info (GCC 3.1-based compiler) Joel Brobecker
00:17 Re: contribution Andi Kleen

April 11, 2002
23:45 Re: -R gcc option? Bryce McKinlay
23:34 Re: -R gcc option? Per Bothner
23:31 Re: Bootstrap failure on alphaev6-dec-osf5.1 Ryszard Kabatek
23:13 Re: -R gcc option? Anthony Green
23:09 New ICE in 3.1 branch: remove_eh_handler, at except.c:2696 Roberto Bagnara
22:08 DLX support as gcc-extension/museum Manuel A." Fernández Montecelo
20:31 RE: Pointer to a function forbid!! Glover George
20:19 Re: CFG-branch merge (Was: Re: DFA scheduler merge - approval issues?) David Edelsohn
17:36 Re: -R gcc option? Bryce McKinlay
15:26 Re: v3.0.4 vs. v2.95.3, Solaris 8, basic_ostream/fstream weirdness Phil Edwards
15:20 Re: -R gcc option? Anthony Green
15:17 Re: v3.0.4 vs. v2.95.3, Solaris 8, basic_ostream/fstream weirdness David P. Michaels
15:02 Re: v3.0.4 vs. v2.95.3, Solaris 8, basic_ostream/fstream weirdness Phil Edwards
14:58 Re: 3.1 branch and sparc-solaris 2.8 Gerald Pfeifer
14:53 Re: GCC 3.1 Release Gabriel Dos Reis
14:47 3.1 branch and sparc-solaris 2.8 Tom Tromey
14:41 v3.0.4 vs. v2.95.3, Solaris 8, basic_ostream/fstream weirdness David P. Michaels
13:59 CFG-branch merge (Was: Re: DFA scheduler merge - approval issues?) Jan Hubicka
13:11 Re: pretend_args and the arg pointer Richard Henderson
13:07 Re: gcc/gmon.c Richard Henderson
12:28 Re: -R gcc option? Phil Edwards
12:04 Re: .n suffixes for function names in stabs debug info (GCC 3.1-based compiler) Daniel Jacobowitz
11:33 Re: -R gcc option? Theodore Papadopoulo
11:25 -R gcc option? Carlos Pereira
11:04 Re: Bootstrap failure on alphaev6-dec-osf5.1 Zack Weinberg
10:43 Re: gcc-64 on HP-UX 11.00 law
10:25 Re: gcc-64 on HP-UX 11.00 H.Merijn Brand
10:14 Re: gcc-64 on HP-UX 11.00 John David Anglin
09:59 Re: Build Error on AIX 4.3.3 with CVS Build David Edelsohn
09:43 pretend_args and the arg pointer D. Towner
09:43 Build Error on AIX 4.3.3 with CVS Build Chip Cuntz
09:32 Re: Flexible and Safe GCOV Format duplicated in projects/cfg.html Andreas Jaeger
09:29 GCC Compiler Vincent Ogwuagwu
09:26 Re: DFA scheduler merge - approval issues? law
09:19 .n suffixes for function names in stabs debug info (GCC 3.1-based compiler) Joel Brobecker
09:15 Re: gcc-64 on HP-UX 11.00 law
08:59 Re: gcc-64 on HP-UX 11.00 H.Merijn Brand
08:19 Re: gcc-64 on HP-UX 11.00 John David Anglin
07:44 Warning: gcc (3.1 branch) is broken for target i686-pc-mingw32 megacz
07:40 suspect assembly code for gcc 2.95.3 for ppc Bob Boz
07:36 gcc/gmon.c John Levon
07:05 RE: DFA scheduler merge - approval issues? Naveen Sharma, Noida
06:02 Re: 64-bit long doubles on i386? Stephen L Moshier
04:38 Re: GCC 3.1 Release Joe Buck
03:08 Re: Incorrect declaration parsing in gcc 3.0.3? Andreas Schwab
03:05 Re: GCC 3.1 ARM crosscompiler crashes (ICE) while compiling GCC 3.1libstdc++ [was Re: GCC 3.1 ARM assembler problem (glibc 2.2.5 related)] Karel Gardas
03:04 Re: Incorrect declaration parsing in gcc 3.0.3? Florian Weimer
02:19 Incorrect declaration parsing in gcc 3.0.3? D. Towner
01:24 Re: gcc-64 on HP-UX 11.00 H.Merijn Brand
00:24 Bootstrap failure on alphaev6-dec-osf5.1 Ryszard Kabatek

April 10, 2002
21:06 Re: 64-bit long doubles on i386? Paul N. Hilfinger
20:02 Re: DFA scheduler merge - approval issues? David S. Miller
20:02 Re: DFA scheduler merge - approval issues? David S. Miller
20:00 Re: DFA scheduler merge - approval issues? David S. Miller
18:21 PowerPC Java bootstrap failure Bryce McKinlay
18:06 Re: GCC 3.1 ARM crosscompiler crashes (ICE) while compiling GCC 3.1 libstdc++ [was Re: GCC 3.1 ARM assembler problem (glibc 2.2.5 related)] Richard Henderson
17:29 Flexible and Safe GCOV Format duplicated in projects/cfg.html Richard Almquist
15:49 Re: Fixing libstdc++/3628 (was: Re: GCC 3.1 Release) Paolo Carlini
15:44 Re: Fixing libstdc++/3628 (was: Re: GCC 3.1 Release) Phil Edwards
15:30 Fixing libstdc++/3628 (was: Re: GCC 3.1 Release) Paolo Carlini
14:02 Re: gcc-64 on HP-UX 11.00 John David Anglin
13:51 Re: DFA scheduler merge - approval issues? Geoff Keating
13:40 Re: DFA scheduler merge - approval issues? Vladimir Makarov
13:31 Re: DFA scheduler merge - approval issues? Stephen Clarke
13:07 Re: GCC 3.1 ARM crosscompiler crashes (ICE) while compiling GCC 3.1 libstdc++ [was Re: GCC 3.1 ARM assembler problem (glibc 2.2.5 related)] Richard Henderson
13:01 GCC 3.1 ARM crosscompiler crashes (ICE) while compiling GCC 3.1libstdc++ [was Re: GCC 3.1 ARM assembler problem (glibc 2.2.5 related)] Karel Gardas
12:53 Re: GCC 3.1 Release Gabriel Dos Reis
12:50 The Linux binutils 2.12.90.4 is released. H . J . Lu
12:45 Re: gcc-64 on HP-UX 11.00 John David Anglin
12:25 Re: DFA scheduler merge - approval issues? Vladimir Makarov
12:04 Re: How do I check the 'WARNING: program timed out'? mike stump
11:56 Re: DFA scheduler merge - approval issues? Vladimir Makarov
11:55 Re: gcc-64 on HP-UX 11.00 H.Merijn Brand
11:47 Re: DFA scheduler merge - approval issues? David Edelsohn
11:43 Re: GCC 3.1 Release Paolo Carlini
11:39 Re: DFA scheduler merge - approval issues? Geoff Keating
11:21 Re: GCC 3.1 Release Benjamin Kosnik
11:15 Re: gcc-64 on HP-UX 11.00 John David Anglin
11:01 Re: DFA scheduler merge - approval issues? Daniel Berlin
10:58 DFA scheduler merge - approval issues? tm
10:35 toplevel configure issue/query Nathanael Nerode
10:24 Re: GCC 3.1 Release Christian Jönsson
10:17 Re: GCC 3.1 Release Mark Mitchell
10:14 Re: GCC 3.1 Release Janis Johnson
09:52 Re: GCC 3.1 Release Mark Mitchell
09:49 Re: successful build gcc-3.0.4 Janis Johnson
09:31 Re: Bootstrap failure on ia64 Richard Henderson
09:20 Bootstrap failure on ia64 Andreas Schwab
08:56 Re: AST-Optimizer and De-Parse Diego Novillo
08:22 Re: AST-Optimizer and De-Parse James Michael DuPont
08:17 Re: GCC 3.1 Release Joe Buck
08:11 Re: GCC 3.1 Release Gabriel Dos Reis
08:07 Re: arm/thumb: GOT and indirections Richard Earnshaw
07:59 Re: arm/thumb: GOT and indirections Adrian von Bidder
07:55 Re: GCC 3.1 Release Joe Buck
07:36 Re: arm/thumb: GOT and indirections Thierry COLIN
07:11 Re: GCC 3.1 ARM assembler problem (glibc 2.2.5 related) [was Re: ARM gcc 3.1 crosscompiler on host i386 linux build fails] Richard Earnshaw
06:45 Warning: gcc (3.1 branch) is broken for target i686-pc-mingw32 megacz
05:58 Re: 64-bit long doubles on i386? Tim Prince
05:50 RE: Short Displacement Optimizations. Naveen Sharma, Noida
05:45 How do I check the 'WARNING: program timed out'? Christian Jönsson
05:23 Re: still problem building cross-compiler, x86 -> solaris2.8 Hans-Peter Nilsson
04:00 64-bit long doubles on i386? Paul N. Hilfinger
03:39 Compilation problem with GCC 3.04 and 2.95.3 Luiz Rafael Culik Guimaraes
02:37 Re: gcc-64 on HP-UX 11.00 H.Merijn Brand
00:20 Re: GCC 3.1 Release Mark Mitchell
00:07 compacting gc Richard Henderson

April 09, 2002
20:08 successful build gcc-3.0.4 Thomas, Phil
16:44 c++ 3.1 branch 20020327 (prerelease) - var args compilation failure - O2 problem on i686 George France
15:36 Re: Yet another sparc-sun-solaris2.8 bootstrap failure Richard Henderson
15:29 Re: Yet another sparc-sun-solaris2.8 bootstrap failure David S. Miller
15:28 denser dwarf macro information (erratum) Jim Blandy
15:23 denser dwarf macro information Jim Blandy
15:02 Re: Yet another sparc-sun-solaris2.8 bootstrap failure Gerald Pfeifer
14:41 Re: still problem building cross-compiler, x86 -> solaris2.8 Per Fransson
14:41 Re: Yet another sparc-sun-solaris2.8 bootstrap failure Tom Tromey
14:26 Re: still problem building cross-compiler, x86 -> solaris2.8 David Edelsohn
14:19 Re: still problem building cross-compiler, x86 -> solaris2.8 Per Fransson
14:08 Re: still problem building cross-compiler, x86 -> solaris2.8 Richard Henderson
14:04 Re: still problem building cross-compiler, x86 -> solaris2.8 Per Fransson
13:05 Re: libgcc_s.so.1 yet again Brad Lucier
12:59 Re: successfully built andinstalled gcc 3.0.4 Janis Johnson
12:49 bitfields on ColdFire Peter Barada
12:40 Re: still problem building cross-compiler, x86 -> solaris2.8 Daniel Jacobowitz
12:31 Re: still problem building cross-compiler, x86 -> solaris2.8 Per Fransson
12:01 Re: still problem building cross-compiler, x86 -> solaris2.8 Richard Henderson
11:55 Re: still problem building cross-compiler, x86 -> solaris2.8 Per Fransson
11:50 forked process couldn't set up input/output: bad file number Nitin Gupta
11:49 Re: still problem building cross-compiler, x86 -> solaris2.8 Richard Henderson
11:35 still problem building cross-compiler, x86 -> solaris2.8 Per Fransson
10:44 Re: GCC 3.1 Release Gabriel Dos Reis
09:58 Re: GCC 3.1 Release Benjamin Kosnik
09:48 Re: Problem found with latest gcj compiler (3.0.4) Tom Tromey
08:07 Re: GCC 3.1 Release Joe Buck
07:08 Problem found with latest gcj compiler (3.0.4) Gilley, Daniel
06:57 Re: Undocumented anomaly with EXTRA_CONSTRAINTS Michael Matz
06:28 Re: Overlapping patterns in toplevel configure.in DJ Delorie
06:24 Re: successfully built andinstalled gcc 3.0.4 Gerald Pfeifer
06:24 Re: Undocumented anomaly with EXTRA_CONSTRAINTS David S. Miller
06:21 Re: Undocumented anomaly with EXTRA_CONSTRAINTS David S. Miller
06:17 Re: Undocumented anomaly with EXTRA_CONSTRAINTS Michael Matz
06:13 Re: Yet another sparc-sun-solaris2.8 bootstrap failure Jakub Jelinek
06:10 Re: Yet another sparc-sun-solaris2.8 bootstrap failure Gerald Pfeifer
05:43 Re: GCC 3.1 ARM assembler problem (glibc 2.2.5 related) [was Re: ARM gcc 3.1 crosscompiler on host i386 linux build fails] Richard Earnshaw
05:19 Re: AST-Optimizer and De-Parse Diego Novillo
05:14 Undocumented anomaly with EXTRA_CONSTRAINTS David S. Miller
02:34 Re: Overlapping patterns in toplevel configure.in Andreas Schwab
02:26 Re: Overlapping patterns in toplevel configure.in Thiemo Seufer
01:56 Re: Committed, changes.html: Mention MMIX and CRIS. Gerald Pfeifer
01:55 Overlapping patterns in toplevel configure.in Andreas Schwab
01:50 Successful Build Bob
01:31 GCC 3.1 ARM assembler problem (glibc 2.2.5 related) [was Re: ARMgcc 3.1 crosscompiler on host i386 linux build fails] Karel Gardas
00:49 Re: gcc/gcc config.gcc config/sparc/linux.h config ... Gerald Pfeifer
00:20 Re: [RFC] libstdc++/6214: Bitset High Priority regression Benjamin Kosnik
00:01 Re: PR c++/5504: Optimization breaks wei-ku-1 from blitz Richard Henderson

April 08, 2002
23:22 Re: Regenerate gcc/configure from gcc/configure.in Christian Jönsson
23:18 Re: Regenerate gcc/configure from gcc/configure.in Alan Modra
23:10 Re: Regenerate gcc/configure from gcc/configure.in Andreas Jaeger
23:01 Re: AST-Optimizer and De-Parse James Michael DuPont
22:55 Regenerate gcc/configure from gcc/configure.in Christian Jönsson
18:33 gcc-ss-20020408 is now available gccadmin
17:01 Re: ARM gcc 3.1 crosscompiler on host i386 linux build fails Alan Modra
16:55 Re: top level autoconfiscation -- I offer a choice... Daniel Jacobowitz
16:54 Re: need help grokking taz-related targets in toplevel Makefile.in Daniel Jacobowitz
16:53 Re: top level autoconfiscation -- I offer a choice... DJ Delorie
16:52 Re: need help grokking taz-related targets in toplevel Makefile.in DJ Delorie
16:46 Re: AST-Optimizer and De-Parse Diego Novillo
16:26 Re: top level autoconfiscation -- I offer a choice... H . J . Lu
16:21 top level autoconfiscation -- I offer a choice... Nathanael Nerode
16:03 need help grokking taz-related targets in toplevel Makefile.in Nathanael Nerode
15:43 Re: Building and installing GCC 3.0.4 on alpha-dec-osf5.1 Janis Johnson
15:41 Re: successfully built andinstalled gcc 3.0.4 Janis Johnson
15:09 [RFC] libstdc++/6214: Bitset High Priority regression Paolo Carlini
14:45 Re: problems building cross-compiler for sparc-sun-solaris on x86 H . J . Lu
14:41 Re: Propose PR 6160 as high priority Richard Kenner
14:36 Re: Propose PR 6160 as high priority Richard Kenner
14:31 Re: Propose PR 6160 as high priority Brad Lucier
14:17 Re: Propose PR 6160 as high priority Richard Kenner
14:15 Re: problems building cross-compiler for sparc-sun-solaris on x86 Joel Sherrill
14:05 Re: Propose PR 6160 as high priority Brad Lucier
13:55 Re: Weak symbols and gcc3.1 Richard Henderson
13:46 Re: Propose PR 6160 as high priority Richard Henderson
13:24 Re: Yet another sparc-sun-solaris2.8 bootstrap failure Jakub Jelinek
13:15 Yet another sparc-sun-solaris2.8 bootstrap failure Gerald Pfeifer
13:02 Re: Java floating-point mess Robert Dewar
12:57 3.1 BUG: reload inheritance / frame pointer elimination Ulrich Weigand
12:30 Re: ARM gcc 3.1 crosscompiler on host i386 linux build fails Karel Gardas
12:22 Re: problems building cross-compiler for sparc-sun-solaris on x86 H . J . Lu
12:10 Re: problems building cross-compiler for sparc-sun-solaris on x86 Joel Sherrill
11:34 RE: problems building cross-compiler for sparc-sun-solaris on x86 Rupert Wood
11:19 problems building cross-compiler for sparc-sun-solaris on x86 Per Fransson
11:02 Welcome to the padaiyappa group padaiyappa Moderator
10:43 Re: ARM gcc 3.1 crosscompiler on host i386 linux build fails Rod Stewart
10:40 Re: ARM gcc 3.1 crosscompiler on host i386 linux build fails Karel Gardas
10:24 Re: ARM gcc 3.1 crosscompiler on host i386 linux build fails Rod Stewart
10:20 ARM gcc 3.1 crosscompiler on host i386 linux build fails Karel Gardas
09:44 Re: Java floating-point mess Tom Tromey
09:36 Re: Current state of multibyte character support Zack Weinberg
08:55 Re: Function inlining report? mike stump
08:36 Re: Function inlining report? Andreas Schwab
08:16 CArray HENRY OLIVIER
08:16 AST-Optimizer and De-Parse James Michael DuPont
07:58 are there known problems developing on MacOS X Alan Lehotsky
07:48 Re: Java floating-point mess Tom Tromey
07:16 Function inlining report? Wirawan Purwanto
04:58 Re: ARM support status Kurt Wall
03:40 Re: ARM support status Philip Blundell
03:38 Re: ARM support status Karel Gardas
03:03 Re: MD_FALLBACK_FRAME_STATE_FOR Bo Thorsen
02:54 Re: ARM support status Philip Blundell
02:41 MD_FALLBACK_FRAME_STATE_FOR Bo Thorsen
02:24 Re: embedding arm instructions in thumb code Philip Blundell
02:19 Re: embedding arm instructions in thumb code Richard Earnshaw
02:14 Building and installing GCC 3.0.4 on alpha-dec-osf5.1 Dror Berger
01:50 Current state of multibyte character support Matt Hiller
01:21 RE: ARM support status jeroen dobbelaere
01:05 Re: status of GCC 3.1 integration testing on ia64-linux Steve Christiansen
01:00 ARM support status Karel Gardas

April 07, 2002
21:44 Re: 3.1 bootstrap failure in libffi on sparc-sun-solaris2.8 Jeff Sturm
20:57 Re: -O9 option Andrew Pinski
20:54 -O9 option Atakan Gurkan
17:13 Re: Weak symbols and gcc3.1 Alan Modra
16:28 Weak symbols and gcc3.1 Boehm, Hans
16:20 Re: embedding arm instructions in thumb code Arvind Krishnaswamy
14:43 GCC 3.1 Benchmarks German Gomez Garcia
14:35 Re: status of GCC 3.1 integration testing on ia64-linux Janis Johnson
14:13 Re: ok to use autogen to generate Makefile.in?... alternatives? Tom Tromey
14:10 Re: info Tom Tromey
14:10 Re: status of GCC 3.1 integration testing on ia64-linux Tom Tromey
12:41 question regarding gcc Pablo Martikian
12:37 Re: [Ada] No GNAT user guide in GCC 3.1 ? Robert Dewar
12:17 [Ada] No GNAT user guide in GCC 3.1 ? Toshitaka Kumano
09:27 Re: gcc-64 on HP-UX 11.00 John David Anglin
09:20 Free Ryukyu-te self-defense techniques! karate
07:48 successfully built andinstalled gcc 3.0.4 Daniel Lima
07:42 Re: reg operator overloading Craig Rodrigues
07:26 reg operator overloading Anand A
06:08 Re: gcc-64 on HP-UX 11.00 H.Merijn Brand

April 06, 2002
23:38 (i386) fix_truncdi_nomemory and earlyclobber '&' Denis Chertykov
23:38 Re: 3.1 bootstrap failure in libffi on sparc-sun-solaris2.8 David S. Miller
23:10 Re: PR c++/5504: Optimization breaks wei-ku-1 from blitz Richard Henderson
22:23 Re: Assembler in GCC Anand A
22:22 Re: GCC Installation Bobby McNulty Junior
22:06 GCC Installation Rabea Husseis
16:57 Re: 3.1 bootstrap failure in libffi on sparc-sun-solaris2.8 Brad Lucier
16:01 Re: 3.1 bootstrap failure in libffi on sparc-sun-solaris2.8 Jakub Jelinek
15:36 3.1 bootstrap failure in libffi on sparc-sun-solaris2.8 Brad Lucier
14:51 Re: PR c++/5504: Optimization breaks wei-ku-1 from blitz Mark Mitchell
12:58 Re: middle-end/6180: Infinite loop in cc1 during dbr pass Richard Henderson
12:12 Re: middle-end/6180: Infinite loop in cc1 during dbr pass John David Anglin
11:43 Re: ICE on illegal code Tim Hollebeek
08:35 Re: ok to use autogen to generate Makefile.in?... alternatives? Bruce Korb
08:29 Re: ok to use autogen to generate Makefile.in?... alternatives? Bruce Korb
07:47 ICE on illegal code Robert Dewar
07:44 Re: GCC 3.1 Release Jason Merrill
06:44 Re: Dropping all back end stuff Jason Merrill
05:22 Re: embedding arm instructions in thumb code Richard Earnshaw
05:11 Re: embedding arm instructions in thumb code Richard Earnshaw
05:10 Re: embedding arm instructions in thumb code Richard Earnshaw

April 05, 2002
22:15 Re: optimization/6007: cfg cleanup tremendous performance hog with-O1 Mark Mitchell
22:03 Re: optimization/6007: cfg cleanup tremendous performance hog with -O1 Brad Lucier
21:06 Re: ok to use autogen to generate Makefile.in?... alternatives? Nathanael Nerode
20:44 Re: ok to use autogen to generate Makefile.in?... alternatives? Nathanael Nerode
19:50 Re: ok to use autogen to generate Makefile.in?... alternatives? Daniel Jacobowitz
19:47 Re: ok to use autogen to generate Makefile.in? Bruce Korb
19:44 Re: ok to use autogen to generate Makefile.in?... alternatives? Bruce Korb
17:48 Re: embedding arm instructions in thumb code Alan Lehotsky
17:40 Re: ok to use autogen to generate Makefile.in?... alternatives? Daniel Jacobowitz
17:23 Re: ok to use autogen to generate Makefile.in?... alternatives? Nathanael Nerode
16:14 Re: ppc more sensitive to duplicate typedefs? Jack Howarth
15:08 Re: c++/5504: Optimization breaks wei-ku-1 from blitz Jason Merrill
14:34 Re: PR c++/5504: Optimization breaks wei-ku-1 from blitz Jason Merrill
13:54 status of GCC 3.1 integration testing on ia64-linux Janis Johnson
13:19 Re: middle-end/6180: Infinite loop in cc1 during dbr pass Richard Henderson
13:04 embedding arm instructions in thumb code Arvind Krishnaswamy
12:45 Re: ok to use autogen to generate Makefile.in? Stan Shebs
11:54 Re: middle-end/6180: Infinite loop in cc1 during dbr pass John David Anglin
11:38 Re: ok to use autogen to generate Makefile.in? DJ Delorie
11:35 Re: middle-end/6180: Infinite loop in cc1 during dbr pass John David Anglin
11:23 Re: AIX *-ibm-aix* Build Notes David Edelsohn
11:01 Propose PR 6160 as high priority lucier
10:01 Re: Java floating-point mess Stephen L Moshier
09:19 Re: ok to use autogen to generate Makefile.in? DJ Delorie
08:06 Re: gcc-64 on HP-UX 11.00 John David Anglin
08:00 Re: ppc more sensitive to duplicate typedefs? Geoff Keating
06:54 Java floating-point mess Stephen L Moshier
06:53 Re: Assembler in GCC Kris Warkentin
06:25 Re: GCC 3.1 Changes (was: gcc/gcc config.gcc config/sparc/linux.hco...) Steven Bosscher
06:20 Re: Java floating-point mess Robert Dewar
05:01 GCC 3.1 Changes (was: gcc/gcc config.gcc config/sparc/linux.h config...) Gerald Pfeifer
04:51 Re: gcc-64 on HP-UX 11.00 H.Merijn Brand
04:49 Re: gcc-64 on HP-UX 11.00 H.Merijn Brand
01:15 Re: Java floating-point mess Andrew Haley
00:22 Re: ppc more sensitive to duplicate typedefs? Kaoru Fukui
00:07 Re: ppc more sensitive to duplicate typedefs? Kaoru Fukui

April 04, 2002
22:45 Re: Assembler in GCC Martin Kahlert
22:12 ok to use autogen to generate Makefile.in? Nathanael Nerode
20:39 Re: java aliasing rules Bryce McKinlay
20:07 Re: java aliasing rules Jeff Sturm
19:17 ppc more sensitive to duplicate typedefs? Jack Howarth
16:45 Re: java aliasing rules Bryce McKinlay
15:58 Re: Why doesn't -fomit-frame-pointer work(very well)? Alan Lehotsky
15:27 Re: Why doesn't -fomit-frame-pointer work(very well)? Peter Barada
15:04 Assembler in GCC Atanas Uzunov
14:16 Re: Warning: gcc (3.1 branch) is broken for target i686-pc-mingw32 Adam Megacz
14:11 Re: 3.1 bootstrap failure on sparcv9-sun-solaris2.8 Richard Henderson
13:48 Re: 3.1 bootstrap failure on sparcv9-sun-solaris2.8 Jakub Jelinek
13:33 3.1 bootstrap failure on sparcv9-sun-solaris2.8 lucier
13:11 Re: java aliasing rules Jeff Sturm
13:00 Re: Sparc ELF definitions of {INIT,FINI}_SECTION_ASM_OP Andreas Schwab
12:57 Re: Java floating-point mess Zack Weinberg
12:50 Re: optimization/6007: cfg cleanup tremendous performance hog with -O1 Jan Hubicka
12:46 Re: ushmedia.h file in sh5-gcc patch Stephen Clarke
12:43 Re: optimization/6007: cfg cleanup tremendous performance hog with -O1 Richard Henderson
12:42 Re: optimization/6007: cfg cleanup tremendous performance hog with -O1 Richard Henderson
12:27 Re: java aliasing rules Andrew Haley
12:26 Re: Sparc ELF definitions of {INIT,FINI}_SECTION_ASM_OP David O'Brien
12:09 Re: Sparc ELF definitions of {INIT,FINI}_SECTION_ASM_OP Richard Henderson
12:02 Re: Sparc ELF definitions of {INIT,FINI}_SECTION_ASM_OP David O'Brien
11:55 Re: gcc-64 on HP-UX 11.00 John David Anglin
11:51 Re: Sparc ELF definitions of {INIT,FINI}_SECTION_ASM_OP Richard Henderson
11:17 Re: Sparc ELF definitions of {INIT,FINI}_SECTION_ASM_OP David O'Brien
10:44 Re: java aliasing rules Jeff Sturm
10:32 Re: Warning: gcc (3.1 branch) is broken for target i686-pc-mingw32 Gerald Pfeifer
10:17 Re: Help Please... David Edelsohn
09:58 Re: GCC 3.1 Release Mark Mitchell
09:56 AIX *-ibm-aix* Build Notes Chip Cuntz
08:33 Re: Why doesn't -fomit-frame-pointer work(very well)? Richard Earnshaw
08:23 Re: Why doesn't -fomit-frame-pointer work(very well)? Ulrich Weigand
08:22 Re: optimization/6007: cfg cleanup tremendous performance hog with -O1 Jan Hubicka
08:21 Re: gcc-64 on HP-UX 11.00 law
08:20 Re: Why doesn't -fomit-frame-pointer work(very well)? Richard Earnshaw
08:04 Re: Why doesn't -fomit-frame-pointer work(very well)? Peter Barada
07:32 FW: Implementation of Exceptions Halldór Ísak Gylfason
07:30 Re: Implementation of Exceptions Robert Dewar
07:27 Warning: gcc (3.1 branch) is broken for target i686-pc-mingw32 megacz
07:23 Implementation of Exceptions Halldór Ísak Gylfason
07:02 Re: Why doesn't -fomit-frame-pointer work(very well)? Ulrich Weigand
06:57 Re: optimization/6007: cfg cleanup tremendous performance hog with -O1 Brad Lucier
06:50 Re: Why doesn't -fomit-frame-pointer work(very well)? Peter Barada
06:23 Re: fstream.h Augusto Flavio
06:11 fstream.h Augusto Flavio
03:56 Re: Java floating-point mess Robert Dewar
02:03 Java floating-point mess Zack Weinberg
01:38 gcc-64 on HP-UX 11.00 H.Merijn Brand
01:26 Re: gcc-3.1/criteria.html -- i?86-redhat-linux Gerald Pfeifer
01:19 gcc-3.1/criteria.html -- i?86-redhat-linux Jakub Jelinek
01:04 ushmedia.h file in sh5-gcc patch Mukta Punjani , Noida

April 03, 2002
23:45 Re: Returning a char from a function Fergus Henderson
23:20 alphaev6-dec-osf5.1 - build of gcc-20020325 failed Ryszard Kabatek
20:22 Re: GCC 3.1 Release John David Anglin
20:19 Re: Help--GCC for dos DJ Delorie
19:23 Help--GCC for dos Zous
18:04 Re: PR c++/5504: Optimization breaks wei-ku-1 from blitz Diego Novillo
17:57 Re: PR c++/5504: Optimization breaks wei-ku-1 from blitz Jason Merrill
17:16 Re: GCC 3.1 Release Phil Edwards
16:12 Re: demangling x86 assembly code Andrew Pinski
16:08 Re: demangling x86 assembly code Joe Buck
16:01 Re: GCC 3.1 Release Joe Buck
15:57 Re: demangling x86 assembly code Andrew Pinski
15:54 Re: Why doesn't -fomit-frame-pointer work(very well)? Ulrich Weigand
15:42 demangling x86 assembly code Joe Buck
15:25 Re: c++ vs decl_external Mark Mitchell
15:13 Re: frame unwind info Jason Merrill
15:12 Re: c++ vs decl_external Jason Merrill
15:06 Re: Why doesn't -fomit-frame-pointer work(very well)? Richard Henderson
15:06 Re: GCC 3.1 Release Phil Edwards
15:04 Re: offsetof "problem" Jason Merrill
15:01 Re: Why doesn't -fomit-frame-pointer work(very well)? Peter Barada
14:52 Re: Sparc ELF definitions of {INIT,FINI}_SECTION_ASM_OP Richard Henderson
14:29 Re: gcc development schedule [Re: sharing libcpp between GDB and GCC] Phil Edwards
14:19 Re: gcc development schedule [Re: sharing libcpp between GDB and GCC] Jim Blandy
13:44 Re: c++ vs decl_external Mark Mitchell
13:41 Re: PATCH for Re: Your main web page / valid XHTML 1.0 Gerald Pfeifer
13:38 Re: c++ vs decl_external Richard Henderson
13:28 Re: Sparc ELF definitions of {INIT,FINI}_SECTION_ASM_OP Richard Henderson
13:23 Re: gcc-3_1-branch regression for g++.old-deja/g++.jason/builtin2.C Mark Mitchell
13:21 Re: c++ vs decl_external Mark Mitchell
13:20 Re: GCC 3.1 Release Mark Mitchell
13:18 Re: Why doesn't -fomit-frame-pointer work(very well)? Richard Henderson
13:16 Re: Why doesn't -fomit-frame-pointer work(very well)? Richard Henderson
12:53 Re: Sparc ELF definitions of {INIT,FINI}_SECTION_ASM_OP David S. Miller
12:51 Re: Sparc ELF definitions of {INIT,FINI}_SECTION_ASM_OP David O'Brien
12:41 Re: Sparc ELF definitions of {INIT,FINI}_SECTION_ASM_OP David S. Miller
12:39 Re: Help Please... David Edelsohn
12:36 Re: Sparc ELF definitions of {INIT,FINI}_SECTION_ASM_OP David O'Brien
12:27 RE: Help Please... Chip Cuntz
12:25 Re: PATCH for Re: Your main web page / valid XHTML 1.0 Hans-Peter Nilsson
12:21 Re: Sparc ELF definitions of {INIT,FINI}_SECTION_ASM_OP David S. Miller
12:20 Re: Why doesn't -fomit-frame-pointer work(very well)? Peter Barada
12:15 Sparc ELF definitions of {INIT,FINI}_SECTION_ASM_OP David O'Brien
12:14 Re: PATCH for Re: Your main web page / valid XHTML 1.0 Andrea 'Fyre Wyzard' Bocci
11:34 Re: gcc-3_1-branch regression for g++.old-deja/g++.jason/builtin2.C Franz Sirl
11:28 Re: Why doesn't -fomit-frame-pointer work(very well)? Roman Zippel
11:26 Re: Why doesn't -fomit-frame-pointer work(very well)? Peter Barada
09:55 Re: Help Please... David Edelsohn
09:32 Re: segfault in libc6-2.2.5:malloc on call from libstdc++ Benjamin Kosnik
09:15 Re: GNATS losing PRs again Neil Booth
09:09 Re: libffi related bootstrap failure on sparc-sun-solaris2.8 Gerald Pfeifer
09:09 segfault in libc6-2.2.5:malloc on call from libstdc++ Craig Maloney
08:43 Help Please... Chip Cuntz
08:02 PATCH for Re: Your main web page / valid XHTML 1.0 Gerald Pfeifer
07:51 Returning a char from a function D. Towner
07:18 Re: SH profiling redux Kris Warkentin
06:20 Your main web page / valid XHTML 1.0 Erik Schnetter
05:14 Re: Short Displacement Optimizations. Robert Dewar
03:56 Re: gcc-3_1-branch regression for g++.old-deja/g++.jason/builtin2.C Roger Sayle
03:47 frame unwind info Halldór Ísak Gylfason
03:44 Re: GNATS losing PRs again Andreas Schwab
02:57 c++ vs decl_external Richard Henderson
02:38 Re: making a 2.95.4 release Wolfram Gloger
02:08 Re: GCC 3.1 Release Reichelt

April 02, 2002
23:41 SH profiling redux NIIBE Yutaka
21:56 GNATS losing PRs again Neil Booth
21:45 Re: definition of REAL_VALUE_TYPE is wrong... Zack Weinberg
21:33 Re: Dropping all back end stuff Richard Henderson
21:22 Short Displacement Optimizations. Naveen Sharma, Noida
19:31 Re: Is GCC 3 ready for prime time? Olivier Galibert
18:26 About check memory over bound yinliyin
18:17 Re: libffi related bootstrap failure on sparc-sun-solaris2.8 Tom Tromey
17:49 [no subject] Dylan Cuthbert
17:15 Is GCC 3 ready for prime time? Jyrinx
16:44 Re: Java and Sparc for 3.1 Tom Tromey
15:30 Re: Your 2001-01-01 patch broke PR fortran/6106 Jakub Jelinek
15:30 Re: gcc-3_1-branch regression for g++.old-deja/g++.jason/synth5.C David Edelsohn
15:26 Re: Your 2001-01-01 patch broke PR fortran/6106 David Edelsohn
15:21 Java and Sparc for 3.1 lucier
15:19 gcc-3_1-branch regression for g++.old-deja/g++.jason/synth5.C John David Anglin
15:10 Re: Your 2001-01-01 patch broke PR fortran/6106 Richard Kenner
14:58 Your 2001-01-01 patch broke PR fortran/6106 Jakub Jelinek
14:47 Re: libffi related bootstrap failure on sparc-sun-solaris2.8 Gerald Pfeifer
14:38 Re: GCC 3.1 Release Tom Tromey
14:26 GCC 3.1 Release Mark Mitchell
14:15 Re: libffi related bootstrap failure on sparc-sun-solaris2.8 Tom Tromey
13:44 Template compiling error using g++ v.2.92 Jez Master
12:38 Re: Why doesn't -fomit-frame-pointer work(very well)? Richard Henderson
12:22 gcc-3_1-branch regression for g++.old-deja/g++.jason/builtin2.C Franz Sirl
12:18 Re: Why doesn't -fomit-frame-pointer work(very well)? Peter Barada
12:12 [Fwd: breakage in darwin] Andreas Tobler
11:40 Re: toplevel autoconfiscation design questions Nathanael Nerode
11:30 Re: toplevel autoconfiscation design questions Daniel Jacobowitz
11:20 toplevel autoconfiscation design questions Nathanael Nerode
10:52 Dropping all back end stuff Dennis Dams
10:51 Re: making a 2.95.4 release Joe Buck
10:50 Re: Gcc Joe Buck
10:34 Re: Gcc Every, Vanessa
08:11 Re: executable fatal error message Fergus Henderson
08:01 executable fatal error message Chris_Whitlock
07:47 [ast-optimizer-branch] mainline merge as of 2002-04-01 Diego Novillo
06:32 libffi related bootstrap failure on sparc-sun-solaris2.8 Gerald Pfeifer
01:09 Re: making a 2.95.4 release Gerald Pfeifer

April 01, 2002
22:52 Re: bugzilla plan + new gcc.gnu.org hardware news Daniel Berlin
21:46 Re: ia64 abi vs variable sized data types Fergus Henderson
21:14 Re: ia64 abi vs variable sized data types Richard Henderson
20:55 Re: bugzilla plan + new gcc.gnu.org hardware news Phil Edwards
20:53 bugzilla plan + new gcc.gnu.org hardware news Christopher Faylor
20:48 catching floating-point exceptions on GNU/Linux kainz
20:37 ARM gcc doesn't work Li Chengyuan
20:00 Re: ia64 abi vs variable sized data types Jim Wilson
19:27 gcc-ss-20020401 is now available gccadmin
17:27 Re: ia64 abi vs variable sized data types Richard Henderson
17:23 Re: ia64 abi vs variable sized data types Andrew Pinski
17:13 ia64 abi vs variable sized data types Richard Henderson
14:49 Re: GCC: accessing exceptiond from C? Joe Buck
14:38 Re: What is 'GCC_3.0' in gcc-3.1's libgcc.map? Phil Edwards
14:02 Re: autoconfiscation -- questions about make usage Nathanael Nerode
13:22 Re: Building java library is slow Raja R Harinath
13:06 lang_type_promotes_to langhook Neil Booth
10:58 Re: Why doesn't -fomit-frame-pointer work(very well)? Richard Henderson
10:01 Why doesn't -fomit-frame-pointer work(very well)? Peter Barada
09:02 Backend using Tree representation Georg Weissenbacher
07:36 Re: GCC build failed for native with your patch on 2002-03-16T11:00:03Z. Geoff Keating
04:52 Re: info Bryce McKinlay
04:22 need a help sachin g satawkar
04:07 need a help sachin g satawkar
02:34 info alex bohemia
01:42 Re: [Ada] fix lib and tools build Laurent Guerby
00:21 Re: Building java library is slow Fergus Henderson
00:15 Re: GCC: accessing exceptiond from C? Fergus Henderson

Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:
Mail converted by MHonArc 2.5.3