This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: GNATS web interface unusable

From: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>
To: Phil Edwards <phil at jaj dot com>
Cc: "Joseph S. Myers" <jsm28 at cam dot ac dot uk>, Daniel Berlin <dan at dberlin dot org>, Craig Rodrigues <rodrigc at attbi dot com>, "David O'Brien" <obrien at FreeBSD dot org>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2002 07:27:37 +0100
Subject: Re: GNATS web interface unusable
References: <20020328152921.C22398@disaster.basement.lan> <Pine.LNX.4.33.0203282046450.20749-100000@kern.srcf.societies.cam.ac.uk> <20020328181611.A25414@disaster.basement.lan>
Reply-to: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>

On Thu, Mar 28, 2002 at 06:16:11PM -0500, Phil Edwards wrote:
> > What should the equivalent of "feedback" be?  Again, the state should 
> > count as open and show up in default searches - though if feedback isn't 
> > given, they'll end up closed as INVALID or WORKSFORME.
> 
> Just leave it as OPEN?  The audit trail / comments are right there.
> 
> If we want a formal state called FEEDBACK, we can add one.

Red Hat bugzilla uses NEEDINFO state for this.

	Jakub

References:
- Re: GNATS web interface unusable
  - From: Phil Edwards
- Re: GNATS web interface unusable
  - From: Joseph S. Myers
- Re: GNATS web interface unusable
  - From: Phil Edwards

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]