This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: java aliasing rules

From: Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>
To: Bryce McKinlay <bryce at waitaki dot otago dot ac dot nz>
Cc: Dan Nicolaescu <dann at godzilla dot ics dot uci dot edu>, java at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: 28 Mar 2002 23:16:15 -0700
Subject: Re: java aliasing rules
References: <200203271143.aa05958@gremlin-relay.ics.uci.edu> <3CA25B77.1000108@waitaki.otago.ac.nz> <87vgbhij40.fsf@creche.redhat.com> <3CA40386.5030106@waitaki.otago.ac.nz>
Reply-to: tromey at redhat dot com

>>>>> "Bryce" == Bryce McKinlay <bryce@waitaki.otago.ac.nz> writes:

Bryce> I believe the array length field is not important for aliasing
Bryce> purposes because it is read-only.

Thanks.

Bryce> For Dan's test case, I can get optimal code simply by setting
Bryce> DECL_NONADDRESSABLE_P on all Java FIELD_DECLS (see the patch
Bryce> below), there's doesn't seem to be any need for
Bryce> java_get_alias_set or changes to the generic alias code to get
Bryce> this.

That's a nice patch!

Tom

Follow-Ups:
- Re: java aliasing rules
  - From: Bryce McKinlay

References:
- Re: java aliasing rules
  - From: Bryce McKinlay
- Re: java aliasing rules
  - From: Tom Tromey
- Re: java aliasing rules
  - From: Bryce McKinlay

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]