This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: GNATS web interface unusable

From: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
To: "Joseph S. Myers" <jsm28 at cam dot ac dot uk>
Cc: Daniel Berlin <dan at dberlin dot org>, Craig Rodrigues <rodrigc at attbi dot com>, "David O'Brien" <obrien at FreeBSD dot org>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2002 22:10:40 -0800
Subject: Re: GNATS web interface unusable
References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0203281200100.1917-100000@dberlin.org> <Pine.LNX.4.33.0203281748400.16122-100000@kern.srcf.societies.cam.ac.uk>

On Thu, Mar 28, 2002 at 05:57:42PM +0000, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2002-02/msg00692.html

I think the NEW/UNCONFIRMED distinction is confusing.  I suppose I
could get used to it, but sort of prefer the ANALYZED state name.

Agree about CLOSED.

While WONTFIX is inappropriate for bugs, and seems odd for enhancement
requests, so INVALID seems odd for enhancement requests as well.  I
wouldn't mind seeing a REJECTED resolution for this situation.



r~

References:
- Re: GNATS web interface unusable
  - From: Daniel Berlin
- Re: GNATS web interface unusable
  - From: Joseph S. Myers

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]