This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Generated insns far from being optimal

From: Peter Barada <pbarada at mail dot wm dot sps dot mot dot com>
To: Alexandre dot Courbot at lifl dot fr
Cc: apl at alum dot mit dot edu, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2002 12:10:45 -0500
Subject: Re: Generated insns far from being optimal
References: <1016634173.1697.9.camel@bruyere> <p04330100b8be52a4b506@[192.168.1.254]> <1016800719.9917.108.camel@bruyere>


>Sorry, this was quite a trivial issue - anyway many thanks Alan, Peter
>and Dmitri! :) It's also very impressive to see how gcc is well done and
>easily adapts to your target's needs.

I'm just glad that I had an answer to your question.  As for gcc
"easily adapting to your target's needs",  You'll find that code
generation is pretty quick to get done, but getting optimal generation
can take quite a bit of thought and tweaking.  Of course if you have a
nice orthoginal chip its a whole lot easier that an m68k/ColdFire
as I can attest to! 

-- 
Peter Barada                                   Peter.Barada@motorola.com
Wizard                                         781-852-2768 (direct)
WaveMark Solutions(wholly owned by Motorola)   781-270-0193 (fax)

References:
- Generated insns far from being optimal
  - From: Alexandre Courbot
- Re: Generated insns far from being optimal
  - From: Alan Lehotsky
- Re: Generated insns far from being optimal
  - From: Alexandre Courbot

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]