This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: 2.95.3 basic_string thread safe?

From: Phil Edwards <phil at jaj dot com>
To: Chris Ramstad <CRamstad at mahinetworks dot com>
Cc: "'gcc at gnu dot org'" <gcc at gnu dot org>
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2002 13:27:54 -0500
Subject: Re: 2.95.3 basic_string thread safe?
References: <9D6D37E97A57D411BB7C00508BAE29C90282B756@main.mahinetworks.com>

On Thu, Mar 21, 2002 at 09:37:25AM -0800, Chris Ramstad wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> we noticed that the grab() implementation does not protect the reference
> increment, while the release() implementation does.
> 
> any thoughts?

Development on 2.x stopped a long long time ago.  The library used in 3.x
has been rewritten from scratch.  You should give it a try.


Phil

-- 
If ye love wealth greater than liberty, the tranquility of servitude greater
than the animating contest for freedom, go home and leave us in peace.  We seek
not your counsel, nor your arms.  Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you;
and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen.            - Samuel Adams

References:
- 2.95.3 basic_string thread safe?
  - From: Chris Ramstad

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]