This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Unnamed functions, functors or, more formally, function literals
- From: dewar at gnat dot com (Robert Dewar)
- To: dewar at gnat dot com, kewarken at qnx dot com, pkoning at equallogic dot com,sd70030 at lanet dot lv
- Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2002 18:26:20 -0500 (EST)
- Subject: Re: Unnamed functions, functors or, more formally, function literals
I see insufficient value in anonymous functions. It seems like minor
syntactic sugar, that in fact does not fit into C very well,
so it is more like syntactic vinegar :-)