This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
- From: Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>
- To: Jason Kary <jkary at cisco dot com>
- Cc: gcc at gnu dot org
- Date: 15 Mar 2002 12:59:23 -0700
- Subject: Re: Question?
- References: <3C923267.email@example.com>
- Reply-to: tromey at redhat dot com
>>>>> "Jason" == Jason Kary <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
Jason> I had a quick question about GCJ? I've been looking through
Jason> the doucmentation and I can seem to find an answer to the
Jason> question of Memory Management. One drawback with Java is it's
Jason> JVM concept uses a LOT of memory resources by creating a JVM
Jason> for each application. If I were to compile my java code using
Jason> GCJ would I gain the benifit of not have a JVM/sandbox for each
Jason> application and in essence allow the OS to do the memory
Jason> management for me????
With libgcj you still have a JVM for each process. However, you'll
probably use less memory because the core class libraries are in a
shared library; the memory used by this library will be shared among
all the processes using it.