gcc archive
date index for March, 2002

This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

March 31, 2002
18:58 g++ regression? constructor function attribute Anthony Green
16:06 Re: Problem in hfa_element_mode for IA64 Richard Henderson
15:49 Re: Problem in hfa_element_mode for IA64 Richard Kenner
15:45 Re: Problem in hfa_element_mode for IA64 Richard Henderson
14:54 Re: Problem in hfa_element_mode for IA64 Richard Kenner
14:52 Re: Problem in hfa_element_mode for IA64 Florian Weimer
14:45 Re: Problem in hfa_element_mode for IA64 Richard Kenner
14:29 Re: GNAT is a compiler, too Robert Dewar
14:25 Re: GNAT is a compiler, too Florian Weimer
14:13 Re: Problem in hfa_element_mode for IA64 Richard Henderson
13:33 Re: [Ada] fix lib and tools build Richard Kenner
13:11 Re: GNAT is a compiler, too Florian Weimer
13:03 Re: [Ada] fix lib and tools build Laurent Guerby
12:14 Problem in hfa_element_mode for IA64 Richard Kenner
12:08 Re: GNAT is a compiler, too Toshitaka Kumano
12:00 Re: GNAT is a compiler, too Toshitaka Kumano
06:48 gcc 3.0.4 redhat 7.2 success Debasis Dan
06:48 Re: making a 2.95.4 release Erik Schnetter
05:48 Re: unrolling and peeling decisions Jan Hubicka
05:18 Re: unrolling and peeling decisions Jan Hubicka
04:18 Re: making a 2.95.4 release Richard Zidlicky
03:37 Re: exception error using SSE extensions with gcc3.1/cygwin Andreas Jaeger
03:34 Re: GCC: accessing exceptiond from C? Kai Henningsen
02:17 Re: Building java library is slow Richard Henderson
02:15 Re: exception error using SSE extensions with gcc3.1/cygwin Richard Henderson
01:30 Re: Building java library is slow Fergus Henderson
01:06 Re: exception error using SSE extensions with gcc3.1/cygwin Andreas Jaeger

March 30, 2002
22:23 exception error using SSE extensions with gcc3.1/cygwin Dylan Cuthbert
20:55 Re: libgcc questions Bryce McKinlay
17:52 offsetof "problem" Andrew Pollard
15:55 Re: unrolling and peeling decisions Zdenek Dvorak
15:28 Re: New regressions because of ICE in flow.c Florian Weimer
15:28 Compile of gcc 3.0.4 / 3.0.3 fails Hauke Joachim Zuehl
15:25 Re: New regressions because of ICE in flow.c Richard Henderson
15:20 Regression from gcc 3.0: openjade Craig Rodrigues
15:06 Re: New regressions because of ICE in flow.c Jan Hubicka
15:04 unrolling and peeling decisions Jan Hubicka
15:04 Re: java aliasing rules Bryce McKinlay
14:58 Re: New regressions because of ICE in flow.c Richard Henderson
14:48 Re: New regressions because of ICE in flow.c Jan Hubicka
14:24 [Ada] ACATS status Laurent Guerby
14:22 Re: libgcc questions Richard Henderson
14:01 Re: GCC: accessing exceptiond from C? Richard Henderson
13:55 Re: java aliasing rules Richard Henderson
13:43 Re: New regressions because of ICE in flow.c Jan Hubicka
12:39 New regressions because of ICE in flow.c Neil Booth
12:30 my bad memory: C++ typechecks on 64 bits arches ? Marc Espie
11:56 Re: printing exceptions? Richard Henderson
11:28 libgcc questions maxwell
11:12 Report to Sender NBLNSMTP1
11:07 Re: ".globl" symbol Florian Weimer
11:04 Re: GCC c Compiler Andrea 'Fyre Wyzard' Bocci
10:05 Re: GCC: accessing exceptiond from C? Kai Henningsen
09:20 Re: GCC: accessing exceptiond from C? Per Bothner
06:37 Re: java aliasing rules Jeff Sturm
05:55 Re: GNATS web interface unusable Gerald Pfeifer
04:54 GCC: accessing exceptiond from C? Kai Henningsen
02:50 GCC c Compiler amit chaudhary
01:18 Re: printing exceptions? Alexandre Oliva

March 29, 2002
22:13 Re: New bugzilla email interface Alexandre Oliva
20:11 ".globl" symbol Mr Steven Mark
19:09 Re: Bugzilla: Go! (was: Status of Bugzilla?) Daniel Jacobowitz
18:44 Re: Bugzilla: Go! (was: Status of Bugzilla?) Christopher Faylor
18:21 Re: Bugzilla: Go! (was: Status of Bugzilla?) Joseph S. Myers
18:18 Re: GNATS web interface unusable Joseph S. Myers
17:38 Bugzilla: Go! (was: Status of Bugzilla?) Gerald Pfeifer
17:17 Re: GNATS web interface unusable Daniel Berlin
16:26 Re: java aliasing rules Richard Henderson
15:48 Re: GNATS web interface unusable Craig Rodrigues
15:24 Re: GNATS web interface unusable Toon Moene
15:22 Re: java aliasing rules Bryce McKinlay
14:00 Re: GCC 3.1 Release Criteria Franz Sirl
13:39 Re: GCC 3.1 Release Criteria Craig Rodrigues
13:39 Iterate over TORTURE_OPTIONS for g++.dg as for gcc.dg? Hans-Peter Nilsson
13:37 Re: optimization/6007: cfg cleanup tremendous performance hog with -O1 Brad Lucier
12:50 GNAT is a compiler, too Toshitaka Kumano
12:28 Re: ada/5856: GNAT bug box improvements Geert Bosch
10:44 Re: GNATS web interface unusable Joseph S. Myers
10:37 Re: GNATS web interface unusable Mark Mitchell
09:00 Re: GCC 3.1 Release Criteria Ahmed Abed
08:44 Re: optimization/6007: cfg cleanup tremendous performance hog with -O1 Brad Lucier
08:29 Re: optimization/6007: cfg cleanup tremendous performance hog with -O1 Jan Hubicka
08:10 Re: c++ Tim Prince
08:10 Re: optimization/6007: cfg cleanup tremendous performance hog with -O1 Jan Hubicka
07:50 c++ kfmiller
06:34 Re: GCC 3.1 Release Criteria Kaoru Fukui
05:56 Re: GCC 3.1 Release Criteria Joel Sherrill
01:41 Re: FW: Java vs. Dwarf2 EH Unwinder Richard Henderson
01:37 Re: FW: Java vs. Dwarf2 EH Unwinder Andrew Haley
00:06 Re: O.T. linux thread library question Andreas Jaeger

March 28, 2002
22:51 Re: GNATS web interface unusable Tom Tromey
22:27 Re: GNATS web interface unusable Jakub Jelinek
22:15 Re: java aliasing rules Tom Tromey
22:13 Re: java aliasing rules Richard Henderson
22:10 Re: GNATS web interface unusable Richard Henderson
22:02 Re: java aliasing rules Bryce McKinlay
21:29 Re: gcc development schedule [Re: sharing libcpp between GDB and GCC] Christopher Faylor
20:49 Re: FW: Java vs. Dwarf2 EH Unwinder Richard Henderson
20:43 Re: FW: Java vs. Dwarf2 EH Unwinder David Mosberger
20:12 Re: FW: Java vs. Dwarf2 EH Unwinder Bryce McKinlay
19:10 O.T. linux thread library question Robert Schweikert
18:59 Low on cash? This is easy and it works! lakers34
18:25 Re: FW: Java vs. Dwarf2 EH Unwinder David Mosberger
18:11 Re: Java vs. Dwarf2 EH Unwinder Richard Henderson
17:45 a g++ compile warning Luke Chang
15:27 Re: GNATS web interface unusable Joseph S. Myers
15:16 Re: GNATS web interface unusable Phil Edwards
14:54 New bugzilla email interface Daniel Berlin
14:22 Re: optimization/6007: cfg cleanup tremendous performance hog with -O1 Brad Lucier
14:05 GCC 3.1 Release Criteria Ahmed Abed
13:26 Re: [Ada] Bootstrapping mainline GNAT fails (with workaround and root cause: makefile bug) Geert Bosch
13:10 definition of REAL_VALUE_TYPE is wrong... apl
13:07 Re: GNATS web interface unusable Joseph S. Myers
12:44 Re: making a 2.95.4 release law
12:34 Re: gcc development schedule [Re: sharing libcpp between GDB and GCC] Phil Edwards
12:29 Re: GNATS web interface unusable Phil Edwards
12:22 Re: Something terribly wrong with gcc-3.0.4 Linux Phil Edwards
12:14 -Werror-severe Morten Welinder
12:10 Re: making a 2.95.4 release Bernd Schmidt
11:58 Re: making a 2.95.4 release Daniel Jacobowitz
11:57 Re: making a 2.95.4 release David O'Brien
11:50 Re: making a 2.95.4 release David O'Brien
11:46 Re: making a 2.95.4 release Bernd Schmidt
11:40 Re: making a 2.95.4 release Daniel Jacobowitz
11:38 Re: GNATS web interface unusable Daniel Jacobowitz
11:21 Re: making a 2.95.4 release Philip Blundell
11:07 Re: broken links on http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-3.1/criteria.html Gerald Pfeifer
10:19 Re: making a 2.95.4 release David O'Brien
10:14 Re: GNATS web interface unusable David O'Brien
10:13 Re: GNATS web interface unusable David O'Brien
10:10 Re: making a 2.95.4 release Bernd Schmidt
09:58 Re: GNATS web interface unusable Joseph S. Myers
09:39 Re: GNATS web interface unusable Gerald Pfeifer
09:39 Re: GCC 3.0.4 build on SCO 3.2 505 Janis Johnson
09:35 Re: making a 2.95.4 release Gerald Pfeifer
09:30 Re: GNATS web interface unusable David O'Brien
09:27 Re: making a 2.95.4 release law
09:23 making a 2.95.4 release David O'Brien
09:01 Re: gcc development schedule [Re: sharing libcpp between GDB and GCC] David O'Brien
09:01 Re: GNATS web interface unusable Daniel Berlin
08:59 Re: gcc development schedule [Re: sharing libcpp between GDB and GCC] David O'Brien
08:54 Re: GNATS web interface unusable Craig Rodrigues
08:49 Re: Building java library is slow Brad Lucier
08:47 GNATS web interface unusable David O'Brien
08:46 -Wuninitialized Nicola Pero
08:42 Re: Something terribly wrong with gcc-3.0.4 Linux Paolo Carlini
08:06 Re: Something terribly wrong with gcc-3.0.4 Linux Paolo Carlini
08:05 Re: Something terribly wrong with gcc-3.0.4 Linux Jakub Jelinek
08:01 Re: Something terribly wrong with gcc-3.0.4 Linux Neal D. Becker
07:55 Re: Something terribly wrong with gcc-3.0.4 Linux Jakub Jelinek
07:28 Re: Something terribly wrong with gcc-3.0.4 Linux Jakub Jelinek
07:17 Re: gcc development schedule [Re: sharing libcpp between GDB and GCC] Christopher Faylor
07:15 Re: Something terribly wrong with gcc-3.0.4 Linux Neal D. Becker
07:04 Re: Something terribly wrong with gcc-3.0.4 Linux Paolo Carlini
06:57 Re: Something terribly wrong with gcc-3.0.4 Linux Neal D. Becker
06:53 Re: Something terribly wrong with gcc-3.0.4 Linux Paolo Carlini
06:39 Something terribly wrong with gcc-3.0.4 Linux Neal D. Becker
05:58 AJP News 28-03-2002 dla gcc AJP
05:58 AJP News 28-03-2002 dla gcc AJP
04:03 Re: optimization/6007: cfg cleanup tremendous performance hog with -O1 Jan Hubicka
04:00 Re: gcc development schedule [Re: sharing libcpp between GDB andGCC] Michael Matz
03:17 Re: Building java library is slow Michael Matz
02:16 GCC-3.0.3, const Compound Literal array and optimisations Etienne Lorrain
02:01 Re: gcc development schedule [Re: sharing libcpp between GDB and GCC] Jason Molenda
01:54 Re: gcc development schedule [Re: sharing libcpp between GDB and GCC] Jason Molenda
01:31 Java vs. Dwarf2 EH Unwinder Andrew Haley
01:22 Re: gcc development schedule [Re: sharing libcpp between GDB andGCC] Gerald Pfeifer

March 27, 2002
19:50 RE: Java vs. Dwarf2 EH Unwinder Boehm, Hans
19:46 Re: gcc development schedule [Re: sharing libcpp between GDB and GCC] Zack Weinberg
19:17 Re: gcc development schedule [Re: sharing libcpp between GDB and GCC] Kaveh R. Ghazi
18:55 Re: Building java library is slow Brad Lucier
18:53 Re: Questions about bootstrap problem on Solaris Brad Lucier
18:51 Re: Building java library is slow Brad Lucier
18:35 Re: Building java library is slow Tom Tromey
18:31 Re: Questions about bootstrap problem on Solaris Tom Tromey
18:27 Re: Successful Compilation Walter Landry
18:17 Re: Building java library is slow Bryce McKinlay
18:06 Re: Building java library is slow Brad Lucier
17:51 Re: Building java library is slow Bryce McKinlay
17:51 Re: Building java library is slow Bryce McKinlay
17:26 Java vs. Dwarf2 EH Unwinder Bryce McKinlay
17:23 Building java library is slow lucier
17:13 Re: Questions about bootstrap problem on Solaris Brad Lucier
16:45 Re: java aliasing rules Tom Tromey
15:54 Re: java aliasing rules Bryce McKinlay
15:50 Re: Questions about bootstrap problem on Solaris Tom Tromey
15:39 Re: Successful Compilation Janis Johnson
15:37 Re: [RFC] nonzero_bits (was Re: Another Java sparc-sun-solaris2.8 bootstrap failure) Richard Henderson
15:29 Re: [RFC] nonzero_bits (was Re: Another Java sparc-sun-solaris2.8 bootstrap failure) Jakub Jelinek
15:17 Re: gcc 3.1 succeeds in building Linux 2.4.18 Gary Hade
15:16 Re: Successful Compilation Walter Landry
14:33 Re: 3.1 branch libstdc++ problem with ctime on hpux Paolo Carlini
14:17 Re: [RFC] nonzero_bits (was Re: Another Java sparc-sun-solaris2.8 bootstrap failure) Richard Henderson
13:47 Re: [RFC] nonzero_bits (was Re: Another Java sparc-sun-solaris2.8 bootstrap failure) Jakub Jelinek
13:38 [RFC] nonzero_bits (was Re: Another Java sparc-sun-solaris2.8 bootstrap failure) Jakub Jelinek
13:25 Re: remaining libjava/verify_local_live_at_start failures Jan Hubicka
12:20 gcc Head breakage make[3]: *** [os_dep.lo] Error1 Matthew Bemis
11:54 Re: Another Java sparc-sun-solaris2.8 bootstrap failure Jakub Jelinek
11:39 Re: gcc 3.1 succeeds in building Linux 2.4.18 Steve Christiansen
11:28 Re: success: gcc 3.0.3 on AIX 4.3.2 Janis Johnson
11:00 success: gcc 3.0.3 on AIX 4.3.2 Hunziker, Scott
10:13 Re: gcc development schedule [Re: sharing libcpp between GDB and GCC] Neil Booth
10:03 Re: gcc-3.0.4 on osf5.1 Janis Johnson
09:47 Re: 3.1 branch libstdc++ problem with ctime on hpux Benjamin Kosnik
09:36 Re: remaining libjava/verify_local_live_at_start failures Richard Henderson
09:14 gcc-3.0.4 on osf5.1 Tony Mossop
08:59 Re: gcc development schedule [Re: sharing libcpp between GDB and GCC] law
08:17 Re: gcc 3.1 succeeds in building Linux 2.4.18 Craig Rodrigues
07:54 Re: [ast-optimizer-branch] Simplification of Simple grammar Diego Novillo
07:44 Re: [ast-optimizer-branch] Simplification of Simple grammar Sebastian Pop
07:32 Re: [ast-optimizer-branch] Simplification of Simple grammar Diego Novillo
07:26 Re: [ast-optimizer-branch] Simplification of Simple grammar Jan Hubicka
07:25 Re: generating infos about compiled code mike stump
07:18 Re: gcc development schedule [Re: sharing libcpp between GDB and GCC] mike stump
06:59 broken links on http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-3.1/criteria.html David Morrison
06:56 Re: [ast-optimizer-branch] Simplification of Simple grammar Diego Novillo
06:50 Re: [ast-optimizer-branch] Simplification of Simple grammar Sebastian Pop
06:43 Re: gcc development schedule [Re: sharing libcpp between GDB and GCC] Gianni Mariani
06:30 Re: gcc development schedule [Re: sharing libcpp between GDB and GCC] Andrew Cagney
06:13 Re: gcc development schedule [Re: sharing libcpp between GDB and GCC] Christoph Hellwig
06:11 Re: [ast-optimizer-branch] Simplification of Simple grammar Diego Novillo
06:06 files included to 3.0.4 release but not tagged as gcc_3_0_4_release in cvs egor duda
06:01 Re: gcc development schedule [Re: sharing libcpp between GDB and GCC] Robert Dewar
05:58 Succesfully Build OSF5.1a /configure --prefix=/usr/local Succesfully Build GCC 3.2 20020326 OSF5.1 Christian Kleinfeld
05:52 Re: remaining libjava/verify_local_live_at_start failures Jan Hubicka
05:38 [ast-optimizer-branch] Simplification of Simple grammar Sebastian Pop
05:17 Re: gcc development schedule [Re: sharing libcpp between GDB andGCC] Joseph S. Myers
05:11 Re: gcc development schedule [Re: sharing libcpp between GDB andGCC] Joseph S. Myers
04:32 Re: gcc development schedule [Re: sharing libcpp between GDB and GCC] Fergus Henderson
02:55 Fwd: failure notice Ronald Fischer
02:47 Re: gcc development schedule [Re: sharing libcpp between GDB andGCC] Michael Matz
01:34 Re: Upgrading RedHat GCC 2.96 Manfred Hollstein
01:29 Re: 3.1 branch libstdc++ problem with ctime on hpux Paolo Carlini
00:19 Re: Solaris 2.6 / Solaris 7 Richard Henderson
00:11 Solaris 2.6 / Solaris 7 Helmut Schroger

March 26, 2002
23:59 Re: problem with Mondays snapshot Richard Henderson
23:53 Re: gcc development schedule [Re: sharing libcpp between GDB andGCC] Tom Lord
23:28 Re: Upgrading RedHat GCC 2.96 Dr Richard Charlewood
23:20 generating infos about compiled code Kai-Uwe Schmidt
23:11 Re: gcc development schedule [Re: sharing libcpp between GDB andGCC] Daniel Berlin
22:54 Re: gcc development schedule [Re: sharing libcpp between GDB andGCC] Tom Lord
22:45 Re: gcc development schedule [Re: sharing libcpp between GDB and GCC] Tom Lord
22:43 Re: gcc development schedule [Re: sharing libcpp between GDB and GCC] Tom Lord
22:39 Re: gcc development schedule [Re: sharing libcpp between GDB andGCC] Andreas Jaeger
22:23 Re: gcc development schedule [Re: sharing libcpp between GDB and GCC] Eli Zaretskii
21:32 Re: gcc development schedule [Re: sharing libcpp between GDB andGCC] Andreas Jaeger
21:10 Bonjour! God
21:10 Bonjour! God
20:37 Re: OpenMP support in gcc Tim Prince
20:16 Re: 3.1 branch libstdc++ problem with ctime on hpux Benjamin Kosnik
20:13 Re: 3.1 branch libstdc++ problem with ctime on hpux Phil Edwards
19:49 Re: 3.1 branch libstdc++ problem with ctime on hpux Benjamin Kosnik
19:48 Re: 3.1 branch libstdc++ problem with ctime on hpux Phil Edwards
19:43 Re: 3.1 branch libstdc++ problem with ctime on hpux law
19:38 Re: 3.1 branch libstdc++ problem with ctime on hpux Benjamin Kosnik
18:48 Re: 3.1 branch libstdc++ problem with ctime on hpux Phil Edwards
18:40 Re: problem with Mondays snapshot Phil Edwards
18:22 Re: Could beohm-gc test be 'dejagnu-ised'? mike stump
18:14 Re: IDE, GDB & PHP mike stump
18:02 problem with Mondays snapshot George.R.Goffe
16:41 Re: gcc development schedule [Re: sharing libcpp between GDB and GCC] Tim Hollebeek
16:03 Re: gcc development schedule [Re: sharing libcpp between GDB and GCC] Tom Lord
15:40 Re: gcc development schedule [Re: sharing libcpp between GDB and GCC] David Edelsohn
15:32 3.1 branch libstdc++ problem with ctime on hpux law
15:31 Re: gcc development schedule [Re: sharing libcpp between GDB and GCC] Zack Weinberg
15:30 Re: The canadian cross build is broken DJ Delorie
15:30 Re: gcc development schedule [Re: sharing libcpp between GDB and GCC] Tom Lord
15:17 Re: gcc development schedule [Re: sharing libcpp between GDB and GCC] Neil Booth
14:59 Re: The canadian cross build is broken H . J . Lu
14:50 Re: gcc development schedule [Re: sharing libcpp between GDB and GCC] Jakub Jelinek
14:49 Re: The canadian cross build is broken DJ Delorie
14:42 Re: Another Java sparc-sun-solaris2.8 bootstrap failure Jakub Jelinek
14:37 Re: gcc development schedule [Re: sharing libcpp between GDB and GCC] David Edelsohn
14:36 Re: The canadian cross build is broken H . J . Lu
14:29 gcc development schedule [Re: sharing libcpp between GDB and GCC] Richard Henderson
14:18 Re: remaining libjava/verify_local_live_at_start failures Richard Henderson
14:13 Re: gcc Head breakage on Alpha - *** [os_dep.lo] Error 1 Tom Tromey
14:11 Market Applications-Overbased Calcium Oleate NineSigma Managed Exchange
14:07 Market Applications-Overbased Calcium Oleate NineSigma Managed Exchange
14:00 Re: The canadian cross build is broken DJ Delorie
13:53 Re: The canadian cross build is broken H . J . Lu
13:50 Re: Path to libstdc++ Alexandre Oliva
13:49 Re: The canadian cross build is broken DJ Delorie
13:42 Re: The canadian cross build is broken H . J . Lu
13:35 Re: The canadian cross build is broken DJ Delorie
13:30 Re: Path to libstdc++ Allan Sandfeld Jensen
13:24 Re: The canadian cross build is broken H . J . Lu
13:08 Re: gcc compiling problems on Solaris 5.8 Phil Edwards
13:05 Re: gcc Head breakage on Alpha - *** [os_dep.lo] Error 1 George France
13:04 gcc compiling problems on Solaris 5.8 Limin Zhao
11:39 Re: FW: Remaining Itanium exception, static linking patches Andrew Haley
11:36 Could beohm-gc test be 'dejagnu-ised'? Christian Jönsson
11:35 Re: help on SunOS4.1.3_U1 Janis Johnson
11:31 Re: FW: Remaining Itanium exception, static linking patches Franz Sirl
11:18 Re: SH profiling redux Kris Warkentin
11:17 Re: SH profiling redux Kris Warkentin
11:17 Re: remaining libjava/verify_local_live_at_start failures John Wehle
10:45 Re: help on SunOS4.1.3_U1 'David Scott Urban
10:44 IDE, GDB & PHP Joel Gerstman
10:34 Re: help on SunOS4.1.3_U1 Janis Johnson
10:32 Re: Will gcc lower C++ to C ? Daniel S. Wilkerson
10:27 Re: GCC successful build Janis Johnson
10:25 Re: GNU gcc build on Sparc / Solaris 8 Janis Johnson
10:21 Re: question about POOMA (integration test for 3.1 release criteria) (fwd) Janis Johnson
10:13 Re: gcc 3.0.4 successful build on solaris 2.9 Janis Johnson
10:10 Re: question about POOMA (integration test for 3.1 releasecriteria)(fwd) Paolo Carlini
10:06 Re: Building gcc3.0.3 on AS/400 David Edelsohn
10:06 GCC successful build Wouter Demuynck
10:00 OpenMP support in gcc Thomas M. Evans
09:59 Re: GCC 3.0.4 build on SCO 3.2 505 Janis Johnson
09:58 Re: Successful GCC 3.0.4 on hppa1.1-hp-hpux10.20 Janis Johnson
09:22 Re: question about POOMA (integration test for 3.1 releasecriteria) (fwd) Mark Mitchell
08:46 Re: Another Java sparc-sun-solaris2.8 bootstrap failure Jakub Jelinek
08:39 Another Java sparc-sun-solaris2.8 bootstrap failure Andrew Haley
08:08 Another Java sparc-sun-solaris2.8 bootstrap failure Gerald Pfeifer
08:08 Re: gcc Head breakage on Alpha - *** [os_dep.lo] Error 1 Andreas Schwab
07:54 gcc Head breakage on Alpha - *** [os_dep.lo] Error 1 George France
07:40 Re: Path to libstdc++ Alexandre Oliva
07:34 Re: Path to libstdc++ Alexandre Oliva
06:54 Re: Successful Compilation mike stump
06:54 Re: help on SunOS4.1.3_U1 'David Scott Urban
06:22 Re: remaining libjava/verify_local_live_at_start failures Jan Hubicka
06:18 Re: remaining libjava/verify_local_live_at_start failures Jan Hubicka
05:54 Re: Upgrading RedHat GCC 2.96 Manfred Hollstein
05:49 Re: Adding notes to existing PRs? Diego Novillo
05:36 Building gcc3.0.3 on AS/400 sita raman
05:32 Re: Upgrading RedHat GCC 2.96 Tim Prince
05:26 Adding notes to existing PRs? Diego Novillo
05:16 Re: Common labels not outputed where needed Lynn Winebarger
04:59 GCC 3.0.4 build on SCO 3.2 505 Renaud Pascal
03:57 best approach to move around registers bigger than word width? Jonah B Graham
03:48 Re: documentation deficiency Gerald Pfeifer
02:57 Re: Upgrading RedHat GCC 2.96 Dr Richard Charlewood
02:53 Re: GNATS loosing bug reports? Jakub Jelinek
02:52 Re: Upgrading RedHat GCC 2.96 Paolo Carlini
02:48 Re: Upgrading RedHat GCC 2.96 Dr Richard Charlewood
02:45 Re: GNATS loosing bug reports? Paolo Carlini
02:44 Re: How do I get pc-relative constant loads? Andreas Schwab
02:37 Re: Unwind fde-glibc Jakub Jelinek
02:01 Re: Path to libstdc++ Allan Sandfeld Jensen
01:59 Re: Upgrading RedHat GCC 2.96 Paolo Carlini
01:35 Unwind fde-glibc Bo Thorsen
01:08 Upgrading RedHat GCC 2.96 Dr Richard Charlewood
01:08 Re: Path to libstdc++ M. Lavasani
01:04 GNATS loosing bug reports? Robert Schiele
00:41 Re: Common labels not outputed where needed Richard Henderson
00:24 Re: Path to libstdc++ Allan Sandfeld Jensen
00:09 Re: Common labels not outputed where needed Alexandre Courbot

March 25, 2002
23:18 Re: sharing libcpp between GDB and GCC Neil Booth
21:41 Re: Will gcc lower C++ to C ? Robert Dewar
21:16 Will gcc lower C++ to C ? Daniel S. Wilkerson
21:07 About check memory over bound yinliyin
21:00 PR c++/5504: Optimization breaks wei-ku-1 from blitz Diego Novillo
20:13 Re: SH profiling redux Kris Warkentin
20:07 Re: sharing libcpp between GDB and GCC Zack Weinberg
20:07 Re: Successful Compilation Walter Landry
19:49 Re: Path to libstdc++ Craig Rodrigues
18:44 Re: SH profiling redux Stephen Clarke
18:32 Re: Common labels not outputed where needed Richard Henderson
18:28 Re: How do I get pc-relative constant loads? Richard Henderson
18:27 gcc-ss-20020325 is now available gccadmin
17:30 Re: Successful Compilation Walter Landry
17:22 Re: Input stream crash with gcc 3.1/cygwin (stack trace incl.) Dylan Cuthbert
17:16 Re: Input stream crash with gcc 3.1/cygwin (stack trace incl.) Dylan Cuthbert
17:16 Re: Odd code generated by binutils assembler for x86 Alan Modra
17:01 Re: Odd code generated by binutils assembler for x86 H . J . Lu
17:01 documentation deficiency jay zipnick
16:55 Re: Odd code generated by binutils assembler for x86 Alan Modra
16:47 Re: Successful Compilation Janis Johnson
16:37 Re: Common labels not outputed where needed mike stump
16:36 Re: remaining libjava/verify_local_live_at_start failures John Wehle
16:15 Re: Odd code generated by binutils assembler for x86 Teemu Torma
15:40 sharing libcpp between GDB and GCC Jim Blandy
15:35 RE: Input stream crash with gcc 3.1/cygwin (stack trace incl.) Benjamin Kosnik
15:34 Re: How do I get pc-relative constant loads? Alan Lehotsky
15:33 Successful Compilation Walter Landry
15:28 RE: Input stream crash with gcc 3.1/cygwin (stack trace incl.) Billinghurst, David (CRTS)
15:27 Re: Odd code generated by binutils assembler for x86 H . J . Lu
15:22 Re: Warning "_XOPEN_SOURCE" redefined while building libf2c/libI77/open.c Toon Moene
15:06 How do I get pc-relative constant loads? Peter Barada
14:15 Re: The canadian cross build is broken DJ Delorie
14:05 Re: Warning "__restrict_arr" redefined while building libiberty/xatexit.c DJ Delorie
13:58 Re: remaining libjava/verify_local_live_at_start failures John Wehle
13:38 Re: Path to libstdc++ Allan Sandfeld Jensen
12:41 Re: RFC: Change rules for adding/changing test cases law
12:26 Multiple entries in impl. of pure virtual function. Craig Maloney
11:17 Re: Input stream crash with gcc 3.1/cygwin (stack trace incl.) Benjamin Kosnik
11:16 Re: Common labels not outputed where needed Richard Henderson
10:41 Re: question about POOMA (integration test for 3.1 releasecriteria) Mark Mitchell
10:25 SH profiling redux Kris Warkentin
10:11 Additional failures on i586-pc-linux-gnu vs. i686-pc-linux-gnu H . J . Lu
09:56 Re: Code size regressions, mainline+branch Daniel Berlin
09:50 Re: The canadian cross build is broken DJ Delorie
09:30 Re: remaining libjava/verify_local_live_at_start failures Richard Henderson
06:12 Common labels not outputed where needed Alexandre Courbot
06:01 Re: Code size regressions, mainline+branch Jan Hubicka
05:55 Re: Path to libstdc++ Manfred Hollstein
05:46 Re: Path to libstdc++ M. Lavasani
05:16 Re: Path to libstdc++ Manfred Hollstein
04:45 Path to libstdc++ M. Lavasani
03:32 Re: CPP documentation Gerald Pfeifer
03:09 Re: Compiler option? Andrea 'Fyre Wyzard' Bocci
02:59 Re: remaining libjava/verify_local_live_at_start failures Jan Hubicka
02:32 Re: remaining libjava/verify_local_live_at_start failures Jan Hubicka
02:14 Re: remaining libjava/verify_local_live_at_start failures Jan Hubicka
00:52 Re: optimization/6007: cfg cleanup tremendous performance hog with -O1 Jan Hubicka
00:47 Re: optimization/6007: cfg cleanup tremendous performance hog with -O1 Richard Henderson
00:41 Re: optimization/6007: cfg cleanup tremendous performance hog with -O1 Jan Hubicka
00:26 Re: Date Error in Announcement Bryce McKinlay
00:14 Re: help on SunOS4.1.3_U1 Piotr Kasztelowicz

March 24, 2002
23:05 Date Error in Announcement Angelo
22:39 Warning "_XOPEN_SOURCE" redefined while building libf2c/libI77/open.c Christian Jönsson
22:30 Warning "__restrict_arr" redefined while building libiberty/xatexit.c Christian Jönsson
22:18 RE: question about LAPACK (integration test for 3.1 release criteria) Billinghurst, David (CRTS)
22:00 Re: Code size regressions, mainline+branch Andreas Jaeger
21:17 Re: Compiler option? Rayson Ho
20:13 The Linux binutils 2.12.90.0.3 is released H . J . Lu
20:03 Input stream crash with gcc 3.1/cygwin (stack trace incl.) Dylan Cuthbert
19:45 Compiler option? yinliyin
17:59 Re: optimization/6007: cfg cleanup tremendous performance hog with -O1 Brad Lucier
17:01 Re: nontrapping math in Java Bryce McKinlay
16:57 Re: nontrapping math in Java Richard Henderson
16:30 Re: nontrapping math in Java Bryce McKinlay
16:23 Re: nontrapping math in Java Richard Henderson
16:19 Re: nontrapping math in Java Bryce McKinlay
13:51 Re: Code size regressions, mainline+branch Jan Hubicka
13:46 Re: Code size regressions, mainline+branch David Edelsohn
13:44 Re: [Ada] Bootstrapping mainline GNAT fails (with workaround androot cause: makefile bug) Russ Allbery
13:27 Re: gcc 3.1 failed to bootstrap on Linux/mipsel Richard Henderson
12:43 gcc 3.1 failed to bootstrap on Linux/mipsel H . J . Lu
12:11 Re: Re; inefficient FPU poerformance Richard Henderson
11:09 Re: nontrapping math in Java Richard Henderson
11:07 Re: Code size regressions, mainline+branch Richard Henderson
10:10 Re: [Ada] Bootstrapping mainline GNAT fails (with workaround androot cause: makefile bug) Andreas Schwab
10:00 Re: [Ada] Bootstrapping mainline GNAT fails (with workaround androot cause: makefile bug) Florian Weimer
09:56 nontrapping math in Java Jan Hubicka
09:22 Error compiling GCC 3.0.4 Snoopy
07:25 Re: [Ada] Bootstrapping mainline GNAT fails (with workaround androot cause: makefile bug) Andreas Schwab
07:15 Code size regressions, mainline+branch Jan Hubicka
04:57 Re: [Ada] Bootstrapping mainline GNAT fails (with workaround androot cause: makefile bug) Joseph S. Myers
02:19 Re: [Ada] Bootstrapping mainline GNAT fails (with workaround androot cause: makefile bug) Andreas Jaeger
01:11 Re: [Ada] Bootstrapping mainline GNAT fails (with workaround androot cause: makefile bug) Florian Weimer

March 23, 2002
23:11 Re: [Ada] Bootstrapping mainline GNAT fails (with workaround androot cause: makefile bug) Andreas Jaeger
15:42 Webmaster: link to "Known bugs in gnu fortran" dont work Ulrich Jäkel
14:59 CPP documentation Andrea 'Fyre Wyzard' Bocci
13:04 Re: [Ada] Bootstrapping mainline GNAT fails (with workaround androot cause: makefile bug) Russ Allbery
12:14 Re: RFC: C/C++ preprocessor macro support for GDB Andrew Cagney
12:06 Re: [Ada] Bootstrapping mainline GNAT fails (with workaround and root cause: makefile bug) Daniel Jacobowitz
10:27 Re: [Ada] Bootstrapping mainline GNAT fails (with workaround androot cause: makefile bug) Florian Weimer
10:22 Re: [Ada] Bootstrapping mainline GNAT fails (with workaround androot cause: makefile bug) Andreas Schwab
10:14 Re: The canadian cross build is broken H . J . Lu
08:38 Re: [Ada] Bootstrapping mainline GNAT fails (with workaround androot cause: makefile bug) lode_leroy at hotmail dot com
07:29 Re: The canadian cross build is broken Andrew Cagney
04:10 RE: FW: Remaining Itanium exception, static linking patches Andrew Haley
00:21 Re: Large resources required to build profiled gcc Brad Lucier

March 22, 2002
23:17 Re: Questions about bootstrap problem on Solaris Gerald Pfeifer
22:52 The canadian cross build is broken H . J . Lu
18:13 RE: FW: Remaining Itanium exception, static linking patches Boehm, Hans
18:04 Re; inefficient FPU poerformance Peter Barada
17:50 Re: 3.1 release criteria Joe Buck
17:31 Re: inefficient float performance Peter Barada
17:30 Re: Class layout differences across platforms ? Fred Forsman
17:21 3.1 release criteria Jimen Ching
17:20 Re: Questions about bootstrap problem on Solaris Tom Tromey
16:51 Re: Questions about bootstrap problem on Solaris Anthony Green
16:39 Re: Large resources required to build profiled gcc Richard Henderson
16:32 Re: Large resources required to build profiled gcc Brad Lucier
16:12 Re: Large resources required to build profiled gcc Jakub Jelinek
16:09 Re: Large resources required to build profiled gcc Brad Lucier
15:52 Re: gcc.dg/cpp/charconst.c vs. WCHAR_TYPE "long int" Neil Booth
15:47 Re: gcc.dg/cpp/charconst.c vs. WCHAR_TYPE "long int" Richard Henderson
15:44 Re: Large resources required to build profiled gcc Richard Henderson
15:42 Re: gcc.dg/cpp/charconst.c vs. WCHAR_TYPE "long int" Neil Booth
15:38 Re: 64 bit host detection Richard Henderson
14:30 Re: Large resources required to build profiled gcc Brad Lucier
14:16 Re: Questions about bootstrap problem on Solaris Phil Edwards
14:05 Re: Questions about bootstrap problem on Solaris Gerald Pfeifer
13:43 Re: copying gcc binaries Janis Johnson
13:42 Re: Large resources required to build profiled gcc Daniel Berlin
13:35 Large resources required to build profiled gcc lucier
13:17 RE: copying gcc binaries Bob Boz
13:17 Re: gcc.dg/cpp/charconst.c vs. WCHAR_TYPE "long int" Neil Booth
13:07 Re: gcc.dg/cpp/charconst.c vs. WCHAR_TYPE "long int" Franz Sirl
12:56 Re: copying gcc binaries Janis Johnson
12:40 copying gcc binaries Bob Boz
12:24 Re: gcc.dg/cpp/charconst.c vs. WCHAR_TYPE "long int" Neil Booth
12:18 Re: gcc.dg/cpp/charconst.c vs. WCHAR_TYPE "long int" Franz Sirl
11:57 Re: No 3.0.4 docs on http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/? Craig Rodrigues
11:40 Re: Questions about bootstrap problem on Solaris Brad Lucier
11:39 Re: gcc.dg/cpp/charconst.c vs. WCHAR_TYPE "long int" Neil Booth
11:32 No 3.0.4 docs on http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/? Stephano Mariani
11:11 Re: reload picks invalid register in 3.1 Richard Henderson
10:15 Re: gcc 3.0.4 successful build on solaris 2.9 George.R.Goffe
10:00 question about LAPACK (integration test for 3.1 release criteria) Janis Johnson
09:59 question about POOMA (integration test for 3.1 release criteria) Janis Johnson
09:31 reload picks invalid register in 3.1 Bob Wilson
09:13 Re: Generated insns far from being optimal Peter Barada
09:10 Re: port for hc12 M.Khaja Mohideen
09:08 Re: PR 3591, PR 5676 - mcore C++ Joe Buck
09:05 Re: Mips profiling Kris Warkentin
09:03 Re: PR 3591, PR 5676 - mcore C++ Phil Edwards
09:01 Re: port for hc12 Alexandre Oliva
08:26 Re: request for copyright forms Gerald Pfeifer
08:18 port for hc12 M.Khaja Mohideen
05:17 Re: Questions about bootstrap problem on Solaris Gerald Pfeifer
05:02 64 bit host detection Bo Thorsen
04:46 Re: PR 3591, PR 5676 - mcore C++ Nick Clifton
04:39 gcc.dg/cpp/charconst.c vs. WCHAR_TYPE "long int" Franz Sirl
04:29 Re: Generated insns far from being optimal Alexandre Courbot
04:08 Re: (OT) Where IS? Augusto Flavio
03:41 Re: optimization/6007: cfg cleanup tremendous performance hog with -O1 Jan Hubicka
02:51 Re: Gcc 3.1 performance regressions with respect to 2.95.3 Jan Hubicka
01:36 Re: [cfg-branch]: Outputs dwarf2 location lists using variable tracking info Jan Hubicka
01:29 Re: (OT) Where IS? Andrea 'Fyre Wyzard' Bocci
01:25 Re: Gcc 3.1 performance regressions with respect to 2.95.3 Jan Hubicka

March 21, 2002
23:40 Re: GCC to open the C++ demangle API? Bo Thorsen
22:40 Re: GCC to open the C++ demangle API? Fergus Henderson
19:30 Where IS? Augusto Flavio
18:40 Re: pointer <-> integer round-up Robert Dewar
18:38 Re: why is the SC relevant (was Re: SC issues revised) Robert Dewar
18:16 Re: pointer <-> integer round-up Robert Dewar
17:37 Questions about bootstrap problem on Solaris Brad Lucier
17:00 Re: Builtins and C++ and such Mark Mitchell
16:05 Re: More troubles in ColdFire land Richard Henderson
15:53 Re: More troubles in ColdFire land Peter Barada
15:35 Re: More troubles in ColdFire land Richard Henderson
15:30 Re: More troubles in ColdFire land Peter Barada
15:12 Re: More troubles in ColdFire land Richard Henderson
15:10 Re: pointer <-> integer round-up Tom Lord
14:54 Re: why is the SC relevant (was Re: SC issues revised) Joe Buck
14:48 Re: Mips profiling Daniel Jacobowitz
14:39 PR 3591, PR 5676 - mcore C++ Jakub Jelinek
14:29 Re: Mips profiling Kris Warkentin
14:06 Re: Mips profiling Daniel Jacobowitz
14:02 Re: Mips profiling Kris Warkentin
13:35 GNU gcc build on Sparc / Solaris 8 ROBERT GIBBS
12:31 Re: Mips profiling Daniel Jacobowitz
12:25 request for copyright forms Osku Salerma
12:17 -pthreads on hppa? Allan Sandfeld Jensen
11:25 Re: Mips profiling Kris Warkentin
11:14 Re: RFC: Change rules for adding/changing test cases Robert Dewar
11:01 Re: pointer <-> integer round-up Robert Dewar
10:28 Re: 2.95.3 basic_string thread safe? Phil Edwards
10:09 More troubles in ColdFire land Peter Barada
09:37 2.95.3 basic_string thread safe? Chris Ramstad
09:34 Re: pointer <-> integer round-up Joe Buck
09:23 Re: RFC: Change rules for adding/changing test cases Richard Earnshaw
09:13 Re: RFC: Change rules for adding/changing test cases Joe Buck
09:11 Re: How do I get the IP-adr from connect's parameters? Joe Buck
09:03 Broken parameter offset in ColdFire v4/v4e port of gcc-3.0.4 Peter Barada
07:43 Re: RFC: Change rules for adding/changing test cases Richard Earnshaw
07:36 Re: RFC: Change rules for adding/changing test cases DJ Delorie
07:32 Re: RFC: Change rules for adding/changing test cases Richard Earnshaw
07:28 Mips profiling Kris Warkentin
07:25 Re: RFC: Change rules for adding/changing test cases DJ Delorie
05:08 How do I get the IP-adr from connect's parameters? Bård Lutzow-Holm Myrstad
04:35 RE: I don't know how to link the object files under uclinux Yun-Gu Lee
03:50 Re: RFC: Change rules for adding/changing test cases Richard Earnshaw
03:35 Re: RFC: Change rules for adding/changing test cases Jakub Jelinek
03:21 Re: RFC: Change rules for adding/changing test cases Richard Earnshaw
03:20 Successful GCC 3.0.4 on hppa1.1-hp-hpux10.20 Tomas Tungel (ETX)
02:10 Re: "const" and "pure" functions pessimize code Daniel Egger
01:14 How to pack the following struct in x86? yinliyin
01:08 Re: why is the SC relevant (was Re: SC issues revised) Tom Lord
00:52 Re: why is the SC relevant (was Re: SC issues revised) Bo Thorsen
00:30 Re: pointer <-> integer round-up Eric Christopher
00:19 Re: [Ada] Bootstrapping mainline GNAT fails Zack Weinberg

March 20, 2002
23:45 Re: Builtins and C++ and such Gabriel Dos Reis
23:18 Re: [Ada] Bootstrapping mainline GNAT fails Neil Booth
21:42 Re: pointer <-> integer round-up Alan Lehotsky
20:04 Re: pointer <-> integer round-up Robert Dewar
19:53 I don't know how to link the object files under uclinux Yun-Gu Lee
18:39 so long and thanks for all the fish Aldy Hernandez
18:10 Re: remaining libjava/verify_local_live_at_start failures Hans-Peter Nilsson
17:25 Re: pointer <-> integer round-up Tom Lord
17:00 Re: Bison1.34 warnings for parse.y Florian Krohm
17:00 Re: [Ada] Bootstrapping mainline GNAT fails mike stump
16:36 Re: why is the SC relevant (was Re: SC issues revised) Per Bothner
16:07 Re: RFC: Change rules for adding/changing test cases Richard Henderson
15:49 Re: pointer <-> integer round-up Robert Dewar
15:28 Re: RFC: Change rules for adding/changing test cases Robert Dewar
15:06 Re: how to write port Stephane Carrez
14:34 Re: build success Janis Johnson
14:33 Re: Successfully built and installed GNU gcc 3.0.4 Janis Johnson
14:31 why is the SC relevant (was Re: SC issues revised) Tom Lord
14:19 Re: [Ada] Bootstrapping mainline GNAT fails Alexandre Oliva
13:55 Re: RFC: Change rules for adding/changing test cases Jeff Knaggs
13:53 Re: Builtins and C++ and such Phil Edwards
13:46 Bison1.34 warnings for parse.y Paolo Carlini
13:45 Re: GCC to open the C++ demangle API? Mark Mitchell
13:29 Re: [PATCH] Builtins and C++ and such Mark Mitchell
13:06 Re: patch for exception problem in GNAT Zack Weinberg
12:41 UCNs in identifiers and numbers Neil Booth
12:37 Re: Builtins and C++ and such Benjamin Kosnik
12:18 Re: pointer <-> integer round-up Fergus Henderson
12:18 Re: Libjava won't build in gcc-3.0.4 under Solaris 2.6 Jeff Sturm
12:09 Re: Builtins and C++ and such mike stump
12:04 Music, musique alabel
12:04 Music, musique alabel
11:38 build success George White
11:31 Re: volatile workaround and how to mark register unused? mike stump
11:30 Letext... Morten Welinder
11:27 Re: patch for exception problem in GNAT Joseph S. Myers
11:26 Re: C headers in C++ (was: Builtins and C++ and such) Jason Merrill
11:02 Re: Builtins and C++ and such Benjamin Kosnik
10:40 "const" and "pure" functions pessimize code Dan Nicolaescu
10:34 Re: get_mem_attrs documentation Mark Mitchell
10:33 Re: pointer <-> integer round-up Tom Lord
10:31 Re: Class layout differences across platforms ? Jason Merrill
10:25 Thanks For The Dedication Jefferson Challenger
10:25 Re: get_mem_attrs documentation Richard Kenner
10:23 Re: [PATCH] Builtins and C++ and such Roger Sayle
10:23 Re: Builtins and C++ and such Mark Mitchell
10:16 Re: [Ada] Bootstrapping mainline GNAT fails Neil Booth
10:03 Re: RFC: Change rules for adding/changing test cases Richard Earnshaw
09:56 Re: GCC to open the C++ demangle API? Joe Buck
09:44 get_mem_attrs documentation Mark Mitchell
09:36 Re: Gcc 3.1 performance regressions with respect to 2.95.3 Peter Schmid
09:09 Re: Builtins and C++ and such Phil Edwards
08:46 Libjava won't build in gcc-3.0.4 under Solaris 2.6 wadedl
08:13 Re: Generated insns far from being optimal Peter Barada
07:59 Re: RFC: Change rules for adding/changing test cases DJ Delorie
07:50 Re: no warning on mixing unsigned and signed Peter Barada
06:58 Re: Generated insns far from being optimal Alan Lehotsky
06:14 Generated insns far from being optimal Alexandre Courbot
06:12 Re: Suggestion for gcc additions: process/thread synchronization Robert Dewar
06:12 Re: :? ?? Michael Matz
06:04 Re: Assignment makes pointer from integer without a cast Robert Dewar
06:01 Re: [Ada] Bootstrapping mainline GNAT fails Robert Dewar
05:52 Class layout differences across platforms ? Thomas Kuhn
05:36 RES: Assignment makes pointer from integer without a cast Lord Byron
05:25 Suggestion for gcc additions: process/thread synchronization bkausbk
05:25