This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [TESTCASE] Minimized testcase for AltiVec segfault
- From: mike stump <mrs at windriver dot com>
- To: geoffk at geoffk dot org, mark at codesourcery dot com, rth at redhat dot com
- Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2002 11:06:26 -0800 (PST)
- Subject: Re: [TESTCASE] Minimized testcase for AltiVec segfault
> Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2002 22:58:57 -0800
> From: Mark Mitchell <email@example.com>
> To: Geoff Keating <firstname.lastname@example.org>, Richard Henderson <email@example.com>
> cc: "firstname.lastname@example.org" <email@example.com>
> > David's comment applies to every option that GCC has; there's no need
> > to go around renaming -funroll-all-loops to -fdebug-unroll-all-loops
> > just because it's sometimes ineffective or dangerous.
> But if I had my way that option, and many other optimization knobs,
> would not exist at all in released versions of GCC!
It would be great if someone fixed all the important outstanding
deficiencies with -funroll-all-loops and made it the default and
removed the option. :-)