This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: -shared-libgcc vs. -static -static-libgcc
- From: Alexandre Oliva <aoliva at redhat dot com>
- To: Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz at redhat dot com>
- Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 27 Feb 2002 22:47:35 -0300
- Subject: Re: -shared-libgcc vs. -static -static-libgcc
- Organization: GCC Team, Red Hat
- References: <Pine.SOL.3.91.1020227171642.15292A-100000@taarna.cygnus.com>
On Feb 27, 2002, Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz@redhat.com> wrote:
> Perhaps I'm missing something, but I would think that passing
> -shared-libgcc down as part of CXXFLAGS instead of part of CXX is also a
> possibility.
What difference would it make? It would end up being used for any C++
compilation just the same, no?
>> I'll look into implementing all of the above, even though any one of
>> them would suffice. But I think having the 3 of them would make it
>> more consistent. Any disagreement?
> I think that would be wonderful.
Will do.
--
Alexandre Oliva Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat GCC Developer aoliva@{cygnus.com, redhat.com}
CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist Professional serial bug killer