This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: -shared-libgcc vs. -static -static-libgcc


On Feb 27, 2002, Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz@redhat.com> wrote:

> Perhaps I'm missing something, but I would think that passing 
> -shared-libgcc down as part of CXXFLAGS instead of part of CXX is also a 
> possibility.

What difference would it make?  It would end up being used for any C++
compilation just the same, no?

>> I'll look into implementing all of the above, even though any one of
>> them would suffice.  But I think having the 3 of them would make it
>> more consistent.  Any disagreement?

> I think that would be wonderful. 

Will do.

-- 
Alexandre Oliva   Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat GCC Developer                  aoliva@{cygnus.com, redhat.com}
CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp        oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist                Professional serial bug killer


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]