This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [TESTCASE] Minimized testcase for AltiVec segfault


On Wed, Feb 27, 2002 at 05:43:23PM -0800, Geoff Keating wrote:
> David's comment applies to every option that GCC has; there's no need
> to go around renaming -funroll-all-loops to -fdebug-unroll-all-loops
> just because it's sometimes ineffective or dangerous.

No, if -funroll-all-loops crashes or produces incorrect code, you
report it as a compiler bug, and it may eventually get fixed.

If -mpowerpc produces "incorrect" code, you get told that you
don't know what you're doing.  So why have options with such
tantilizing names?


r~


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]