This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Sucessful build - gcc3.0.4 - hp10.20
- From: Janis Johnson <janis187 at us dot ibm dot com>
- To: Joe Buck <Joe dot Buck at synopsys dot com>
- Cc: Patrick Lagace <plagace at giref dot ulaval dot ca>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2002 09:56:25 -0800
- Subject: Re: Sucessful build - gcc3.0.4 - hp10.20
- References: <3C7D0FCB.email@example.com> <200202271729.JAA07425@atrus.synopsys.com>
On Wed, Feb 27, 2002 at 09:29:03AM -0800, Joe Buck wrote:
> This build should not count for the purpose of the build status page.
> See below.
> > C and C++
> > config.guess:
> > hppa2.0-hp-hpux10.20
> > gcc -v:
> > Reading specs from bin/../lib/gcc-lib/hppa2.0-hp-hpux10.20/3.0.4/specs
> > Configured with: ../gcc-3.0.4/configure --with-gnu-as
> > --with-as=/opt/binutils/bin/as
> > Thread model: single
> > gcc version 3.0.4
> > Comments:
> > A older GCC was used to build this one; this is not a "make bootstrap"
> > using the native compiler, a simple "make".
> Then you aren't testing the ability of the compiler to build itself,
> and furthermore the executable you generated will not be the same as
> the executable produced by a proper "make bootstrap".
Joe's right, I'll remove this entry.