This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Calls to qp float lib out of sparcv9 head compiler

From: Olivier Hainque <hainque at ACT-Europe dot FR>
To: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: 27 Feb 2002 13:10:56 +0100
Subject: Re: Calls to qp float lib out of sparcv9 head compiler
References: <kt8z9gfe25.fsf@berlin.int.act-europe.fr><20020226101234.D28494@redhat.com>


Thanks for your prompt reply :)

Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com> writes:

> On Tue, Feb 26, 2002 at 04:38:58PM +0100, Olivier Hainque wrote:
> > These calls seem unnecessary to me...
> 
> They are not "unnecessary".

 Ops, Indeed. Got confused by another test case.

> 
> >         call    __fixunsdfdi, 0
> >          nop
> 
> VXworks is using a DFmode long double, instead of a TFmode
> long double like Solaris.  Someone apparently missed this
> when doing the vxworks port in the first place.

 Humm. Hadn't noticed that. Thanks for the hint.

 Kind Regards,

 Olivier

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Calls to qp float lib out of sparcv9 head compiler
  - From: Olivier Hainque

References:
- Calls to qp float lib out of sparcv9 head compiler
  - From: Olivier Hainque
- Re: Calls to qp float lib out of sparcv9 head compiler
  - From: Richard Henderson

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]