This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [cxx-abi-dev] Re: Mistake in C++ ABI substitution rules?
Stan Shebs <email@example.com> writes:
> Incidentally, the kernel guy now reports that he has a remangler
> capable of converting all the 2.95 mangled symbols in Darwin kernel
> and drivers to their 3.1 counterparts. Next is to try booting a
> 3.1-compiled kernel and see what happens when the 3.1 base classes
> actually load the 2.95-compiled derived classes that make up the
Not that this is relevant for the ABI discussions: but won't there be
issues with changes to object layout as well?