This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Performance with IA64


My comparison was between the Microsoft compiler on Win64 and the gcc on 
Linux/IA64.

- Thomas

Tim Prince wrote:

>On Friday 22 February 2002 01:20, Thomas Hiller wrote:
>
>>Hi,
>>
>>I tested the gcc 3.0.2 (and gcc 3.1 at that time) and got in the end a
>>25% degradation compared to the Win64 compiler.
>>
>Just curious; is there a general understanding of which compiler is meant?  I 
>have used only the Microsoft and Intel compilers for Windows, each of which 
>is in a different pricing and support model category.  I would be surprised 
>if there were a gcc for Win64; even more surprised if it performed better 
>than on linux.
>
>>Have the current 3.1 snapshots optimization for IA64 that can change the
>>picture ?
>>What are the plans to get at least near to Win64 ?
>>
>>I'm using Linux on IA64.
>>
>>Thanks in advance.
>>
>>Best regards,
>>Thomas
>>




Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]