This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Performance with IA64
My comparison was between the Microsoft compiler on Win64 and the gcc on
Tim Prince wrote:
>On Friday 22 February 2002 01:20, Thomas Hiller wrote:
>>I tested the gcc 3.0.2 (and gcc 3.1 at that time) and got in the end a
>>25% degradation compared to the Win64 compiler.
>Just curious; is there a general understanding of which compiler is meant? I
>have used only the Microsoft and Intel compilers for Windows, each of which
>is in a different pricing and support model category. I would be surprised
>if there were a gcc for Win64; even more surprised if it performed better
>than on linux.
>>Have the current 3.1 snapshots optimization for IA64 that can change the
>>What are the plans to get at least near to Win64 ?
>>I'm using Linux on IA64.
>>Thanks in advance.