This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: libstdc++ libtool lossage
- From: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
- To: David Edelsohn <dje at watson dot ibm dot com>
- Cc: Alexandre Oliva <aoliva at redhat dot com>, Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, java-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2002 11:09:55 -0800
- Subject: Re: libstdc++ libtool lossage
- References: <firstname.lastname@example.org> <200202231629.LAA22940@makai.watson.ibm.com>
On Sat, Feb 23, 2002 at 11:29:28AM -0500, David Edelsohn wrote:
> "gcc -shared -shared-libgcc" is redundant and wrong.
No it isn't. Why do you insist otherwise?
> If you need something special for your target, make a
> target-specific change, e.g., override CXX_FOR_TARGET in top-level config
> or some other target-dependent location.
No, what I'd like is for the X libraries to be linked
without libgcc.so. I'd like the gnome libraries to be
linked without libgcc.so.
How does changing gcc's top-level config affect that?