This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: GCC 3.1 Branch

From: "H . J . Lu" <hjl at lucon dot org>
To: David Edelsohn <dje at watson dot ibm dot com>
Cc: kenner at vlsi1 dot ultra dot nyu dot edu,Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2002 20:39:39 -0800
Subject: Re: GCC 3.1 Branch
References: <10202220208.AA24322@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu> <200202220257.VAA25608@makai.watson.ibm.com>

On Thu, Feb 21, 2002 at 09:57:17PM -0500, David Edelsohn wrote:
> >>>>> Richard Kenner writes:
> 
> > I intend to create the GCC 3.1 branch sometime tomorrow.
> > If you know of a reason why we should not create the branch, please
> > let me know.  (I'm not sure what this would be, but just in case...)
> 
> Richard> At the moment, Sparc doesn't bootstrap.  It would be nice to get this
> Richard> fixed and then wait at least a day for some testing before the branch.
> Richard> I'd suggest Monday, assuming it actually is fixed tonight.
> 
> 	I agree that this recently introduced Sparc bootstrap failure
> should be fixed before a branch is made.
> 

Has anyone looked into the i586 C++ EH problem? It will be nice to see
it fixed before 3.1. Also -g1 for stabs/dwarf-2 is broken/useless for
gdb in the current gcc. Even a simple backstrace doesn't work with -g1.
If there is no plan to fix it, which I don't mind, shouldn't we compile
libgcc with -g0 or -g.

H.J.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: GCC 3.1 Branch
  - From: David Edelsohn

References:
- Re: GCC 3.1 Branch
  - From: Richard Kenner
- Re: GCC 3.1 Branch
  - From: David Edelsohn

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]