This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: CVS and gcc trees
On Wed, Feb 20, 2002 at 03:49:55PM +0100, Franz Sirl wrote:
> At 22:26 19.02.2002, Phil Edwards wrote:
> >On Mon, Feb 18, 2002 at 01:09:41PM -0500, Peter Barada wrote:
> > >
> > > Note the '+' in libstdc++v3. How does the gcc cvs repository get
> > > around this limitation of cvs? I've looked at the latest cvs source
> > > (1.11.1p1) and in src/edit.c it explicitely checks for '+'.
> >We use 1.10, with some speed modifications.
> The CVS mirror subversions.gnu.org uses 1.11.1.p1 too and it seems to work
> fine for gcc. I just noticed that this version has the additional benefit
> of printing the complete path on 'cvs diff', making the pipe thru
> contrib/index-prop superflous, so I want that cvs version on gcc.gnu.org
> too :-).
Actually, it turns out that I misspoke: the correct answer would have been,
"none of us use the cvs edit command". :-)
I've found that using patch(1) in POSIX mode really helps when applying
If ye love wealth greater than liberty, the tranquility of servitude greater
than the animating contest for freedom, go home and leave us in peace. We seek
not your counsel, nor your arms. Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you;
and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen. - Samuel Adams