This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: -MM, 2.95 vs 3.0
- From: Magnus Fromreide <magfr at lysator dot liu dot se>
- To: Ian Britten <britten at caris dot com>
- Cc: Nathan Sidwell <nathan at codesourcery dot com>, <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>,<neil at daikokuya dot demon dot co dot uk>
- Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2002 08:05:07 +0100 (MET)
- Subject: Re: -MM, 2.95 vs 3.0
On Tue, 19 Feb 2002, Ian Britten wrote:
> I think we knew that...
> However, I think we became addicted(?), focused(?) on GCC's behaviour, and
> this became the driving concern...
The obvious way for now to mark a directory as a member of the system
include path seems to be to use -idirafter rather than -I.
> I guess it's time to re-examine this assumption, and perhaps to generate
> the dependencies per-compiler/platform (especially if GCC is going to
But this is of course the Right Thing to do.
Dependency information is inherently platform dependant and it might also
depend on stuff like compiler options and such.