This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: -MM, 2.95 vs 3.0
- From: Magnus Fromreide <magfr at lysator dot liu dot se>
- To: Ian Britten <britten at caris dot com>
- Cc: Nathan Sidwell <nathan at codesourcery dot com>, <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>,<neil at daikokuya dot demon dot co dot uk>
- Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2002 08:05:07 +0100 (MET)
- Subject: Re: -MM, 2.95 vs 3.0
On Tue, 19 Feb 2002, Ian Britten wrote:
> I think we knew that...
> However, I think we became addicted(?), focused(?) on GCC's behaviour, and
> this became the driving concern...
The obvious way for now to mark a directory as a member of the system
include path seems to be to use -idirafter rather than -I.
> ...
> I guess it's time to re-examine this assumption, and perhaps to generate
> the dependencies per-compiler/platform (especially if GCC is going to
> change...)
But this is of course the Right Thing to do.
Dependency information is inherently platform dependant and it might also
depend on stuff like compiler options and such.