This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: -MM, 2.95 vs 3.0


On Tue, 19 Feb 2002, Ian Britten wrote:

> I think we knew that...
> However, I think we became addicted(?), focused(?) on GCC's behaviour, and
> this became the driving concern...

The obvious way for now to mark a directory as a member of the system
include path seems to be to use -idirafter rather than -I.

> ...
> I guess it's time to re-examine this assumption, and perhaps to generate
> the dependencies per-compiler/platform (especially if GCC is going to
> change...)

But this is of course the Right Thing to do.
Dependency information is inherently platform dependant and it might also
depend on stuff like compiler options and such.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]