This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: -MM, 2.95 vs 3.0
Ian Britten wrote:-
> [ FYI - Reminder...
> Note that GCC v3.0.1 does _not_ behave as you/Neil describe (ie. that the
> dependencies are for all non-SYSTEM files), but is still as I described
> (Only files included via ""). Newer versions may work the way you
> describe (Haven't tried yet), but if you think 3.0.1 behaves the way you
> describe, there may be a bug in it... ]
Yah, like I said (in the newsgroup) 3.0.x's idea of a "system header
file" is a little screwy. 3.1 is as I described.