This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: libstdc++ libtool lossage
On Sun, Feb 17, 2002 at 10:48:56AM -0500, Jeff Sturm wrote:
> I'd guess this is an issue for libgcj as well.
Perhaps, I havn't checked. It doesn't use the special hack in
configure.in, so its --tag=CXX doesn't get changed out from
> > (1a) libstdc++.so is built with xgcc instead of g++,
> But it is also built with --tag=CXX so libtool would try to do the right
> thing, I suppose.
> (I had thought it was decided long ago that -shared would imply
> -shared-libgcc, or had I imagined it?)
We now have PT_GNU_EH_FRAME on some systems. This allows us to not
call __register_frame_info from crtbegin, which means that plain C
shared libraries don't need any of the EH routines. Which means that
we can avoid depending on libgcc_s.so when not necessary.
> > There is no way it should be this difficult to build a stinking
> > shared library.
> Provided a GNU-ish system with glibc etc., it's really quite easy.
It's really quite easy on solaris, irix, and tru64 as well. Pass
one argument to ld and it Just Works.
> That's not why libtool exists...
I know, but I'm less and less interested in such systems as time
> (What in heck does automake have to do with it?)
It's another thing that I don't understand, have to fight from
time to time, and don't see any advantage from using.