This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: copyprop_hardreg_forward removes division
> > Lars Brinkhoff <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> > > Jan Hubicka <email@example.com> writes:
> > > > Lars Brinkhoff wrote:
> > > > > I have a problem with a dissapearing division instruction.
> > > > It looks like you are having same problem as I had. copyprop_hardreg misses
> > > > the stores to subregs. I've commited fix to that so hope it is OK in the
> > > > tree (see kill_value).
> > > No. I'm using the trunk of the tree, updated yesterday, and your
> > > patch seems to be there
> > kill_set_value is called with the SUBREGs, so I need something like
> > this, or else kill_set_value will never call kill_value. However,
> > this duplicates what your patch did to kill_value, so maybe we can
> > just change "REG_P(x)" to "(REG_P (x) || GET_CODE (x) == SUBREG)"
> > or something.S
> > What do you think? I'll make a fully tested patch when I know what
> > the best solution is.
> I guess this is not complettely valid. We are setting the subreg, not the
> reg itself. Safe fix would be to call kill_value outside the if block.
> I will send patch shortly.
I've sent patch that should fix the problem to the other thread
about fabs on P4 that exhibits the same bug.