This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: GCC 3.0.3 on Solaris 2.5.1
- From: Phil Edwards <phil at jaj dot com>
- To: Joe Buck <jbuck at synopsys dot COM>
- Cc: Joseph S D Yao <jsdy at center dot osis dot gov>, Jeff Sturm <jsturm at one-point dot com>, Martin Kahlert <martin dot kahlert at infineon dot com>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, steve at smc dot vnet dot net
- Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2002 17:49:35 -0500
- Subject: Re: GCC 3.0.3 on Solaris 2.5.1
- References: <20020215165319.Y7945@washington.center.osis.gov> <200202152223.OAA06485@atrus.synopsys.com>
On Fri, Feb 15, 2002 at 02:23:54PM -0800, Joe Buck wrote:
> > >
> > > This is incorrect. gcc 3.* works fine with the vendor-supplied assembler
> > > and linker on Solaris.
> > Then I am wondering where www.sunfreeware.com came up with both the
> > comment on binutils and the comment about 2.95.3 being the latest one
> > available for Solaris 2.5.1.
> I recently lost access to my Solaris 2.5.1 machine, but at least for a
> while there was a problem with gettext, which I needed to specify
> --disable-nls to work around. Perhaps the sunfreeware people ran into
> this and gave up.
I had similar NLS problems on my Suns. Other than that, the vendor-supplied
tools work fine for me too.
Note that GNU ld will be required for 3.1, *iff* you want the symbols in
libstdc++.so to be versioned. Nobody has announced intentions to write
the symbol map for non-GNU-ld linkers.
If ye love wealth greater than liberty, the tranquility of servitude greater
than the animating contest for freedom, go home and leave us in peace. We seek
not your counsel, nor your arms. Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you;
and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen. - Samuel Adams