This is the mail archive of the mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Experiment: gcc and doxygen

On Fri, Feb 15, 2002 at 03:11:02PM -0500, Phil Edwards wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 15, 2002 at 08:31:14PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> > Phil Edwards <> writes:
> > 
> > > 2)  GraphViz is from AT&T (,
> > >     with a spinoff at, and last time I checked required
> > >     strange AT&T tools to build from source.  Get a prebuilt binary.
> > 
> > GraphViz is not free software, at least that's my reading of the
> > license.
> Quoting from their download page:
>     graphviz is open source licensed software. It may be redistributed
>     without cost in other software distributions, as long as the license
>     terms (such as redistributing the source intact) are met. We believe
>     the license conforms to the Open Source Definition but they won't tell
>     us their decision.
> It then goes on to state the differences between their license and the GPL.
> I am rabidly apathetic about GPL issues.  My personal litmus test is:
> if Debian distributes it, it's free enough.

Package: graphviz
Section: non-free/graphics

In other words, it is not "part of" Debian.  I'm not terribly
comfortable with requiring it to build docs; Debian stopped doing so
for precisely this reason, I believe.

Daniel Jacobowitz                           Carnegie Mellon University
MontaVista Software                         Debian GNU/Linux Developer

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]