This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Frame pointer using more than one register
- From: Marek Michalkiewicz <marekm at amelek dot gda dot pl>
- To: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, denisc at overta dot ru
- Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2002 12:52:32 +0100 (CET)
- Subject: Frame pointer using more than one register
Hello,
I've just read a bug report for the AVR port - the problem is
that the frame pointer consists of two 8-bit registers (r29:r28)
and some parts of GCC are not prepared for it. One of such
places was fixed long time ago:
Sat May 19 09:40:45 2001 Denis Chertykov <denisc@overta.ru>
* regrename.c (regrename_optimize): frame pointer register can
use a few hardregs.
But I've just found another one - recog.c (peep2_find_free_register):
/* And we don't clobber traceback for noreturn functions. */
if ((regno == FRAME_POINTER_REGNUM || regno == HARD_FRAME_POINTER_REGNUM)
&& (! reload_completed || frame_pointer_needed))
continue;
This means GCC avoids r28, but happily allocates r29 for a QImode
peephole2 scratch register, which is wrong if the frame pointer
is used. I think this code should check if regno is within a range
of register numbers: FRAME_POINTER_REGNUM to (FRAME_POINTER_REGNUM
+ number_of_hard_registers_used_by_frame_pointer - 1) inclusive.
My question is - are there any other places like this, where GCC
assumes (which is correct for most other targets, but wrong for AVR)
that the frame pointer is a single hard register? If yes, it may be
safer to change avr_hard_regno_mode_ok() to disallow QImode in r29
for now, to avoid similar bugs in the future...
Thanks,
Marek