This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Status of Bugzilla?
- From: Christopher Faylor <cgf at redhat dot com>
- To: Gerald Pfeifer <pfeifer at dbai dot tuwien dot ac dot at>
- Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, mike stump <mrs at windriver dot com>, Phil Blundell <pb at nexus dot co dot uk>, Bryce McKinlay <bryce at waitaki dot otago dot ac dot nz>, Craig Rodrigues <rodrigc at mediaone dot net>, Daniel Berlin <dan at dberlin dot org>, Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>, "Joseph S. Myers" <jsm28 at cam dot ac dot uk>
- Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2002 23:15:23 -0500
- Subject: Re: Status of Bugzilla?
- References: <3C634A23.email@example.com> <Pine.BSF.firstname.lastname@example.org>
On Sat, Feb 09, 2002 at 03:06:54PM +0100, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
>On Wed, 6 Feb 2002, mike stump wrote:
>>> I would appreciate clarification of the GCC project's stance on this
>> The way to do this, is to take a vote of all the people that make the
>> heaviest use of the the bug reporting system [...]
>As far as I saw, this "vote" has been relatively clear in favor of
>switching to Bugzilla.
>> See if anybody in power (SC) wants to veto it.
>I will take care of informing the SC
>> Then find someone with enough access to the gcc.gnu.org machine willing
>> to `be responsible' for implementing it on the gcc.gnu.org machine and
>> watching it and making it work.
>Given this feedback and Daniel's committment, I'm willing to approve all
>web-related changes and also help from the gcc.gnu.org machine-side.
I am a big fan of Bugzilla. I'd be happy to help with setup on the
gcc.gnu.org side, too.
Has anyone thought about approaching all of the projects on
gcc.gnu.org/sources.redhat.com and seeing if they want to switch over
to Bugzilla? We've discussed it occasionally in gdb-land, too, but
if gcc is committed to it maybe this is the time to move everything.