This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Criteria for a warning to be in -Wall? (was: Re: a warning to implement)
- From: Toon Moene <toon at moene dot indiv dot nluug dot nl>
- To: Joe Buck <jbuck at synopsys dot COM>
- Cc: Robert Dewar <dewar at gnat dot com>, galibert at pobox dot com, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2002 21:02:46 +0100
- Subject: Re: Criteria for a warning to be in -Wall? (was: Re: a warning to implement)
- Organization: Moene Computational Physics, Maartensdijk, The Netherlands
- References: <200202070700.XAA15119@atrus.synopsys.com>
Joe Buck wrote:
> It seems to me that if we had an optimization level (call it -O0.5, or
> just adjust -O1) in which, at the end of each line, values get flushed
> back to memory, we'd pretty much have it: complicated expressions inside
> one line of code could be optimized as much as you want, but the
> developer in the debugger would see just what he wrote.
Do you mean the 66 columns between column 7 and 72 or the (potentially)
1320 characters in a 39-line continuation ?
[ Just kiddin' ]
Toon Moene - mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org - phoneto: +31 346 214290
Saturnushof 14, 3738 XG Maartensdijk, The Netherlands
Maintainer, GNU Fortran 77: http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/g77_news.html
Join GNU Fortran 95: http://g95.sourceforge.net/ (under construction)