This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Status of Bugzilla?
- From: Daniel Berlin <dan at dberlin dot org>
- To: Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>
- Cc: "Joseph S. Myers" <jsm28 at cam dot ac dot uk>, Craig Rodrigues <rodrigc at mediaone dot net>, <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2002 14:29:44 -0500 (EST)
- Subject: Re: Status of Bugzilla?
On 7 Feb 2002, Tom Tromey wrote:
> >>>>> "Joseph" == Joseph S Myers <email@example.com> writes:
> Joseph> I'd be happy with the answer "gcc-bugs will get everything,
> Joseph> gcc-prs will go away" (and don't really care what goes to
> Joseph> java-prs), since I think the present multiple bugs lists (with
> Joseph> a lot of duplication) are more complicated and confusing than
> Joseph> necessary.
> Generally speaking I'm interested in every Java bug report and in very
> few reports against any other part of the compiler. Having a separate
> Java list serves me well. That said, I don't care whether the
> distribution mechanism happens to be a list or whether I'm simply
> auto-CCd on every Java report -- just so long as I don't have to poll
> the web server to see what is new.
In that case, it's easiest to just assign the initial owner of java
component bugs to a java list, and just assign the rest of the components
to gcc-prs by default.