This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Status of Bugzilla?
- From: Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>
- To: "Joseph S. Myers" <jsm28 at cam dot ac dot uk>
- Cc: Daniel Berlin <dan at dberlin dot org>, Craig Rodrigues <rodrigc at mediaone dot net>, <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: 07 Feb 2002 12:17:39 -0700
- Subject: Re: Status of Bugzilla?
- References: <Pine.LNX.firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Reply-to: tromey at redhat dot com
>>>>> "Joseph" == Joseph S Myers <email@example.com> writes:
Joseph> I'd be happy with the answer "gcc-bugs will get everything,
Joseph> gcc-prs will go away" (and don't really care what goes to
Joseph> java-prs), since I think the present multiple bugs lists (with
Joseph> a lot of duplication) are more complicated and confusing than
Generally speaking I'm interested in every Java bug report and in very
few reports against any other part of the compiler. Having a separate
Java list serves me well. That said, I don't care whether the
distribution mechanism happens to be a list or whether I'm simply
auto-CCd on every Java report -- just so long as I don't have to poll
the web server to see what is new.