This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Loop unrolling-related SPEC regressions?

Here is the new comparison between

AMD     (S): 
http://www.spec.org/osg/cpu2000/results/res2000q4/cpu2000-20001204-00426.asc
Andreas (G): 
http://www.spec.org/osg/cpu2000/results/res2001q2/cpu2000-20010519-00651.asc

                  G   S   G/S   GP   SP  GP/SP
    164.gzip     608 472 1.288  619  563 1.099
    175.vpr      319 255 1.250  342  285 1.200
    176.gcc      357 248 1.439  430  355 1.211
    181.mcf      229 194 1.180  232  196 1.183
    186.crafty   665 632 1.052  692  678 1.020
    197.parser   436 372 1.172  434  373 1.163
    252.eon      839 692 1.212 1046 1056 0.990
    253.perlbmk  759 668 1.136  748  720 1.038
    254.gap      581 441 1.317  579  441 1.312
    255.vortex   764 702 1.088  796  731 1.088
    256.bzip2    401 335 1.197  423  343 1.233
    300.twolf    417 340 1.226  421  360 1.169

I assume I have made a stoopid mistake somewhere,
otherwise why is AMD still submitting SPEC results
based on the Intel compiler?

May be SPECfp is showing another picture though.

-- 
Laurent Guerby <guerby@acm.org>
Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]