This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: a warning to implement
- From: dewar at gnat dot com (Robert Dewar)
- To: dewar at gnat dot com, gdr at codesourcery dot com
- Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, rsandifo at redhat dot com
- Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2002 11:38:47 -0500 (EST)
- Subject: Re: a warning to implement
I asked where it said in the documentation that
int a = a;
has a well defined meaning, and you replied that you had
already answered that questoin, and I had ignored the answer.
Perhaps you did not read my message carefully and realize
that it was referring only to the int case?
We are only discussing warnings here for the cases where
the semantics is clearly undefined in the standard. My
question was whether gcc had given defined semantics to
any of these cases. My understanding is that the answer
to this question is no, despite your most recent message
on the subject.