This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Loop unrolling-related SPEC regressions?
Paolo Carlini <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> Andreas Jaeger wrote:
>>Tell me if you like to see other runs,
> Thank you very much, Andreas.
>>164.gzip 1400 561 250* 1400 559 250*
>>186.crafty 1000 279 358* 1000 279 358*
> Really indistinguishable, right?
>>Est. SPECint_base2000 227
>> Est. SPECint2000 227
> Andreas, please excuse my *very* stupid question (for sure I could
> find this explained somewhere in your pages ;-)
> How these SPEC indexes compare with those you publish on the WEB? I
> mean they are roughly half in size.
Let's check... Oh, it's a different machine it's the one I
But nevertheless the numbers look wrong...
I found it - I forgot to add -O3 :-(
Ok, I rerun the tests with correct flags now:
cflags base: -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -march=athlon -funroll-loops -fstrict-aliasing -malign-double
cflags peak: -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -march=athlon -funroll-loops -fstrict-aliasing -malign-double
Sorry - and thanks for looking closer into these...
SuSE Labs email@example.com