This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Loop unrolling-related SPEC regressions?
Andreas Jaeger wrote:
>Tell me if you like to see other runs,
Thank you very much, Andreas.
>164.gzip 1400 561 250* 1400 559 250*
>186.crafty 1000 279 358* 1000 279 358*
Really indistinguishable, right?
>Est. SPECint_base2000 227
> Est. SPECint2000 227
Andreas, please excuse my *very* stupid question (for sure I could find
this explained somewhere in your pages ;-)
How these SPEC indexes compare with those you publish on the WEB? I mean
they are roughly half in size.