This is the mail archive of the mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: a warning to implement

On Tue, Feb 05, 2002 at 11:48:19PM +0100, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
> Joe Buck <> writes:
> | 
> | If we add a new warning to -Wall, people will discover bugs in their code
> | quickly.  If we add a new warning but not to -Wall, 99% of gcc users will
> | be unaware of the new warning and never use it.
> I'm skeptical: New warnings were added, but not in -Wall, and yet
> people got aware of it.

Yes, but only slowly, over time, as they read the manual in desparation.  :-)

I agree that the warning shouldn't be in -Wall, but I think we could do
a better job of educating our users about the GCC features which are not
as well-known.  Non-Wall warnings seem to fall into this category.

No, I don't have any immediate ideas on how to do this.  ("GCC's Feature
of the Week for this week is:  Warnings Not Included In -Wall"...)


If ye love wealth greater than liberty, the tranquility of servitude greater
than the animating contest for freedom, go home and leave us in peace.  We seek
not your counsel, nor your arms.  Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you;
and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen.            - Samuel Adams

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]